US Vanity Fair October 2006 : Tom, Katie & Suri Cruise by Annie Leibovitz

[julesrules815]

hahahahahaha thank god that wasn't the reall pic!!!

 

[NOE]

From gawker.com this is the info for the crazy picture I posted in #108:

Suri: The Photo You Won't See In Vanity Fair
We highly recommend you go buy your own copy of Vanity Fair; you will surely want to keep and frame the images within. Here at Gawker, however, we've been fortunate enough to obtain an original shot of the Cruise family, one untouched by the photo-editors at VF. Everything seems at once more and less confusing.

 

[Faith Akiyama]

Wait, whoa, did they retouch her eyes, then? Or is it just two different shots where she began squinting? Because if they airbrushed her eyes to make them bigger, then perhaps she's not as adorable as she seems on the cover...

 

[NOE]

What's with the 'real' photo. Why did they change her eyes so much?... besides the fact that is does look better. What would make you think "what could we do to make this baby look better". That's just too creepy.

 

[julesrules815]

whoa wait that was the original picture?!? how can you retouch a baby?! that is just wrong!

 

[NOE]

I guess that is why it took 3 days of 're-touching'. Wow, I'm appauled.

 

[Faith Akiyama]

I guess that is why it took 3 days of 're-touching'. Wow, I'm appauled.

Exactly, my goodness!

 

[MizBlue]

Beautiful Baby!

 

[L.A.Gant]

Come on, there is no way that first picture is real. I am sure it was changed to mock the baby and the whole Suri saga. It's typical Gawker...

I sure hope I'm right....

 

[NOE]

Well now I'm confused... Which one do we think is the REAL photo? I wonder if the one in VF is real, and gawker photoshopped it... or the other way around This whole story of Tomcat is so messed up.

 

[julesrules815]

i think the gawker one is photoshopped. when i saw both pics, i thought the gawker one was fake. the eyes dont look like they fit with the baby. it looks like they took the eyes from baby Zoolander in the movie and put it on Suri's face.

 

[NOE]

Yea, but something about the other photo (with the bigger eyes) looks off too.

We're gonna need to see candids to really know for sure!

All I know is, there was 3 days of re-touching... which seems like an awful lot to me... but I know nothing about photograhpy.

 

[cheiby11]

all pics in magazines are re-touched!

She's sweet, she reminds me a little Bjork

 

[NOE]

I realize that all magazine photos are re-touched

Anywho, Gawker just posted this new disclaimer about the weird picture:

A Special Note to Our Readers (and the Vanity Fair PR Department This is a parody. A parody. The Asian baby photoshopped into this image is not meant to represent the Asian baby shown in the actual image. The baby in this photo is not Tom Cruise's daughter. As far as we know; the dude gets around. Thank you for your wisdom and understanding.

Pheww, relief. So hopefully she is as cute as she seems.
*Wait's for candids to surface*

 

[KhaoticKharma]

I had more hair than Suri at three months

 

[NOE]

Here's the entire set!!!!! Eekk!! So cute.
http://icydk.com/2006/09/06/update-all-the-suri-pictures/

 

[Faith Akiyama]

How adorable!

 

[La Bellabello]

At the moment i´m´trying to find some pictures of Tom Cruise, when he was a baby, to see the the differences, or if she looks like him.
I´m curious, but I cant find any!

 

[Mirik]

Pretty ))
i've also found this one

http://www.livejournal.com/community/instyle_girl/348236.html

 

[Mirik]

http://www.tomcruisefan.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=596

better quality, 19 pages