Valentina Zelyaeva

Untitled-1.jpg


S05ads_coll5.jpg


Shame there aren't high res versions available of that new ralph lauren collection campaign of her.
 
I don't understand why people call Valentina "generic" or "typical". It is easy to find models who are flawed - some special, distinct feature that makes them stand out, almost everyone has one. But to find that pure, perfect beauty - now that's rare.
 
BTW, does anyone have scans of her 10 magazine cover and editorial? They are simply stunning and will change the minds of anyone who doesn't like her!
 
I will try to scan them myself :) Sorry for the cut-offness, but 10 is a very big magazine and my scanner is very small! Anyway, here is the cover:

2lbaew
 
#2 (This one is actually a 2-pager, but I didn't scan the other half because it's only her hair)

2lbb0z
 
#4 (Dunno what went wrong with this one, but at least you get the general idea...)

2lbd6a
 
#6 (Sorry I skipped #5, but that one was too complicated for me to try to scan!)

2lbdoi
 
#7 (Oops... well at least you can see her face :p)

2lbe6r
 
The final picture... Sorry for the crappiness of the scans! Hopefully a more professional scanner will be able to do this series later (it really is gorgeous, especially on paper). Anyway, for now, at least you can get the gist of it!
2lbz4i
 
Beautiful, beautiful, beautiful... but what's up with the hairy arms? I'm sure it's lightened, but it's still so obvious. Don't they wax it/nair it off?
 
While she is definitely beautiful, I'm really not a fan of her eyes. They don't seem to be very focused, nor do I feel they show very much emotion.
 
nippon

actually small light arm hairs are really cute, to me.
i cannot say the same about leg or underarm hair!!

those b&w's are stunning i may have to buy that 10.

val fans MUST find the march nippon vogue [julia cover] there is a nautical edit with val that is just as great as julia's more edgy shoot.

valentina is pretty much in the top 10 girls of 2005 now, I wonder how long models.com will take to say that?
 
Adore said:
I don't understand why people call Valentina "generic" or "typical". It is easy to find models who are flawed - some special, distinct feature that makes them stand out, almost everyone has one. But to find that pure, perfect beauty - now that's rare.

Yes- Valentina's flaw is that she has no flaws. But wait, that means she is flawed, and thus transcends the generic and becomes the highly coveted "edgy"! Who knew?
Thanks for the scans :flower:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,168
Messages
15,212,699
Members
87,103
Latest member
cloudywithachanceofawesom
Back
Top