Vanity Fair August 2010 : Angelina Jolie by Patrick Demarchelier | Page 5 | the Fashion Spot

Vanity Fair August 2010 : Angelina Jolie by Patrick Demarchelier

I hate when that happens, and you can't get a good look at the contents. If my fingers are feeling sprightly, I'll try to type out the Hopper parts... hopefully without any great spelling mistakes like the one in my first post above, where I seemed to have different and differing in my mind, and ended up with 'differint'. And it's about the LA art scene, not the NY one, that's what I get for not reading the whole thing.

I thought the Angie interview would be posted up at vanityfair.com but it's just some snippets, so here's the only part that seemed meaningful to me. It's still a bit verbose, but in comparison to the rest of the feature, it's a moment of sense:

It’s a challenge, writing about actors, especially a good actor, because you can’t always tell when they’re being honest and when they’re pretending - that is, when they’re acting. The really good ones don’t always seem to know themselves. With Jolie though, it seems genuine - she is completely absorbed in the role of the matriarch, the architect of a perfect family. For this role, she will cast aside all others. You can’t help but see her performance as drawing, Stanislavsky-like, on her own memories of childhood, divorce, trouble with her father. Her family situation, though unusual (a new sport; extreme parenting), seems to result from the simple desire expressed by the old-time movie mogul: she wants re-write; she wants to give her kids the life she imagined for herself but never got to lead.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Still disappointed with the cover, hasn't grown on me. I mean she looks gorgeous of course but still.
I don't agree with this "we need something more original" in terms on Angie's look. I think her best looks are and always have been the movie star or the sexually dirty girl (but the latter isn't really appropriate anymore). She really is like new generation of movie star, she's gorgeous, talented, damaged, intelligent, elusive, endearing, a philanthropist, married to another gorgeous movie star and she seems real (as in she's experienced about things we all have and hasn't spoken about how she dealt with it).

I think the problem is everyone's always look for new angles of Angelina and a knew way to write about her, shoot her, talk to her, represent her etc. and there's no need. You don't need to embellish or enhance her, visually or through writing - I mean, I think she's fabulous just the way she is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
vmx0sn.jpg
4pwqjr.jpg


She looks gorgeous.

Source: Coco Perez
 
For anyone interested in the Dennis Hopper parts, without the bother of buying the magazine:

Bob Colacello wrote:

“I’m sorry, I’m not feeling well” was the first thing Dennis Hopper said to me when I went to interview him a month before his death from prostate cancer, on May 29 of this year. The star of Easy Rider, Apocalypse Now, and Blue Velvet was lying on a long gray velvet sofa in the loft-like living room of his house in Venice California, but he sat up to greet me. For a 74-year-old who was gravely ill, he didn’t look too bad, or perhaps his eagerness to talk and his droll sense of humour made things seem better than they were. His face was somewhat hollowed out, but that just made his sky-blue eyes seem bigger and stranger than ever. His weight was down to 104 pounds, but gray sweatpants and a long-sleeved T-shirt with the letters STK printed across the front covered that up. I asked him what the letters stood for. “I don’t know. It’s white and it’s clean,” he said with a chuckle.

There was a big black painting hanging on the wall behind Hopper. “That’s the last thing I did,” he said. “I took a walk on a Sunday in Venice, Italy. Took a digital photograph. All my photographs are full-frame, so that’s a full frame. ‘Sunday Afternoon Walk in Venice, Italy’ is what that series is called. Then I made it into an oil painting.” There were artworks everywhere - on the walls, on the floor, on tables - including a painting of eyeglasses by John Baldessari. “I love that Baldessari,” he said. “Nobody knows why.” There were also a few blank spots on the walls, with picture hooks still in place. “We’ve been rearranging,” Hopper explained. He was alluding to his separation from his fifth wife, Victoria Duffy Hopper, 42. He had filed for divorce in January. But we weren’t supposed to talk about that. The occasion for this interview was the retrospective of Hopper’s photography, painting and sculpture, which was to open on July 11 at MOCA, the Museum of Contemporary Art, in downtown Los Angeles.

We were on the upper floor of Hopper’s home, a big corrugated-steel box he had built in the late 80s. A few years earlier, on the adjacent lot, Frank Gehry and two artist friends of Hopper’s Chuck Arnoldi and Laddie John Dill, had erected a trio of nearly identical structures they called “the three little pigs” - one made of concrete, one of plywood, and one of green roofing shingles. Hopper eventually came to own all three. He used one as his office. His 19-year-old actor son, Henry, by his fourth wife, the dancer Katherine LaNasa, lives in one. And after he and Victoria Duffy Hopper split, she moved into the third, with their seven-year-old daughter, Galen. Hopper’s other two children were with him that afternoon. Marin, 47, his daughter by his first wife, the writer Brooke Hayward, manages Hopper’s studio. Ruthanna, 37, his daughter by his third wife, the actress Daria Halprin, was there with her four-month-old baby, Elle. (An eight-day marriage to Michelle Phillips, of the Mamas and the Papas, his second, was childless.)

We started to talk about his upcoming retrospective. Hopper told me he had met with MOCA’s new director, Jeffrey Deitch, the previous week. “I was very impressed.” The idea for the show, he added, had come from Tony Shafrazi, his long-time New York dealer, and Julian Schnabel, the painter and filmmaker, whom MOCA asked to curate it. “They were really the ones that talked about it. I think it’s great.”

Suddenly he said, “Oh man, I’m getting pain in my stomach. I’ve got to stop talking.” He asked me if I could come back the following afternoon, after his doctor’s appointment. “I have to work my way into this. I want to give it my best shot.”

[About five pages of general museum manoeuvrings and scandal follows...]
 
Continued...

I went to see two of Hopper’s oldest friends in the Los Angeles art world: Irving Blum, one of its founding fathers, and Ed Ruscha, its first star. In 1958, Blum joined the Ferus Gallery, the city’s first important contemporary-art gallery (now long gone), in West Hollywood. One of Blum’s many claims to fame is that he gave Andy Warhol his first show, in July 1962. “I went to see Andy at this house in New York,” Blum told me. “He showed me several Campbell’s Soup Can paintings. I said, ‘You should show these in California.’ I knew he was thinking his friends were in New York and he didn’t know that many people on the West Coast. I took his arm and said, ‘Andy, movie stars come into the gallery.’ He said, ‘Let’s do it.’ The truth was that no movie stars ever came into the gallery. Dennis Hopper did.

“He photographed all of the artists we showed - Bob Irwin, Bally Al Bengston, Ed Ruscha - and I used his photographs as announcements. And I’ll never forget: I got these transparencies of the Lichtenstein show I was going to have in 1963. And Dennis looked really hard at them. There was no such thing as ‘Pop’ style then. People called it different things. Ivan Karp, at the Leo Castelli Gallery, called it ‘Commonism.’ Two days later Dennis came back into the gallery and said, ‘I want to take you somewhere.’ We drove to a billboard place called Foster & Kleiser. And we looked at several of the sheets they would plaster on billboards. They were enormous, but they would fold them flat. Dennis bought three or four. We went up to Crescent Heights, where he and Brooke lived. He begun putting them up as wallpaper - a giant hamburger in his bedroom. Drove Brooke mad. But he caught the Pop sensibility before it was a sensibility.”

Ed Ruscha met Dennis Hopper in 1961 or 1962. The Los Angeles art world, Ruscha recalled, was “miniscule but vital. Dennis was a fixture. He had an exhibit at the David Stuart Gallery, which was a few doors north of Ferus. He was just always around, always taking pictures and making things. I remember visiting him, and he said, ‘Let me show you my garage.’ It was jammed with these sculptures he did. The thing I appreciated was he was so kind of restless, And then you say, God, he’s had more than one life. I mean, here he checks in with all these great performances in movies, but he always comes back to art. He bought my first big painting of the Standard gas station, and now it’s in Sid Bass’s collection. I guess Dennis lost it in his divorce with Brooke.” Did he remember what Hopper had paid for the painting, considered one of his most significant works? “Yeah, $1,500.”

At Dennis Hopper’s place, the clutter starts in the garage, which is packed with paintings, children’s toys, and a pair of motorcycles with flat tires. When I returned to continue our interview, two assistants were going through boxes of his photographs in preparation for the MOCA retrospective. It was inspiring to see some of his most memorable images flip by; a shirtless Paul Newman sitting in the shadow of a chain-link fence; Robert Rauschenberg having his tongue stamped by Claes Oldenburg; a whole series on the 11965 civil-rights march from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama.

We talked for two hours and covered a wide range of topics, from art to politics, from William Burroughs to Lynda Resnick (“She’s cool, wow. What she’s doing, man, with pomegranates - it’s amazing”). I asked him what he thought was the greatest achievement of his career. “Easy Rider,” he answered without hesitation. “Easy Rider and The Last Movie were the only films that I made totally on my own.” And as an actor? “I think Blue Velvet, probably. But I’ve been in such incredible movies. I think at one point I’d been in the five most expensive movies ever made - not that I had large parts in them. Apocalypse Now was one.” If he had to make Easy Rider again, would be make it differently? “Would I make it now? It was about then. And I think a filmmaker’s responsibility is to show his time. Brueghel, I think, was the first artist to show his time.”

Hopper, who grew up in Kansas and San Diego, didn’t go to college. “People sit around the Riviera Country Club and say, ‘What school did you go to?’ And I say, ‘Warner Bros.’ It’s true. I signed a contract when I was 18.” When did he begin collecting art? “The first thing I got, Vincent Price gave me. He was the only one in Hollywood who had a contemporary collection. There were a lot of people, like Billy Wilder, who had good collections of the Impressionists, but nobody had any of the other areas, except Donald Factor, Max Factor’s son, and me.” He “really got serious” about photography, he said, after he married Brooke Hayward. He told me their divorce came about as he was leaving for New Orleans to shoot Easy Rider. “On the way to the airport she said, ‘You’re on a fool’s journey. Peter [Fonda] can’t act. You’re just going to make a fool of yourself.’ And I said, ‘Well, that’s the way it’s going to go.’ So we got divorced in the car. We just said, ‘That’s it.’” (“It’s completely idiotic,” Hayward told me of Hopper’s account, adding that she didn’t file for divorce until several months later.)

That led him to his last marriage. For 14 years the Hoppers had seemed to be happily married. They met in 1992, when Victoria Duffy, an aspiring actress, introduced herself to Hopper in a restaurant. Their split quickly turned ugly, as charges and counter charges were leaked by both sides throughout the winter. “Who would have ever thought I’d be getting a divorce in this state? It was a big shock,” Hopper told me.

So we moved on to politics. How did it happen that a counterculture icon came to vote for George W. Bush twice? “I’d been a liberal Democrat my entire life, until the choice between Bush and Gore,” he explained. “I looked at the two of them and said, ‘Who would I rather have on my side in a fight?’ Bush. That’s a true story. Then Victoria got very involved with the Obama campaign, and I stepped back out of it. I thought it was good for her to get some glory. It’s hard being married to a celebrity.” His support of Bush seems to have been an aberration. “I didn’t think much of Ronald Reagan as an actor, and I didn’t think much of him as governor and president,” he told me. “I like Clinton, I like Obama. I hate what’s happening to the country. I think we’re in the worst shape I’ve ever soon. Just think how conservative this country has become, It’s like the 60sw never happened.”

Did he ever consider himself primarily a director, an actor, or an artist? “I made my living as an actor, and I love acting, so I’m an actor,” he said. “But that gets you in a lot of trouble in the art world. I tell you who’s got it: Viggo Mortensen. He’s a terrific writer. He paints. And he makes music.” As he talked, it became obvious that even in his wild, drug-filled days - he had given up drinking 27 years ago, he told me - he had always taken his art seriously. “I just wanted to make sure that I was doing something that nobody had ever done before.”

Talking about the LA art scene, he noted, “I was around when MOCA first started. I watched Eli Broad’s growth. He’s done more cultural things for this city than anyone. There’s some funny business going on now, but at least it’s progressing culturally. For me, this thing at MOCA supersedes everything. But I never thought I’d end up there. I mean, to at last have a show in LA. I’ve shown at the Cinematique, in Paris, a retrospective. The Stedelijk, in Amsterdam, retrospective. The MAK, in Vienna, retrospective. The Hermitage, in Russian, retrospective. Putin wanted to meet me! I guess he’s seen a lot of bad guys. He shook my hand and said, ‘I love your work.’”
 
^ Thank you so much for typing that out; it was really interesting to read. It was longer than I expected, and included some good quotes, so thanks. :flower:
 
Angelina The Conqueror - Angelina Jolie photographed by Patrick Demarchelier



my scans
 
thank u so much Harumi for the scans! Angie looks so beautiful in her ed. Can't wait to get this issue!
 
The cover is sexy, but it looks like they made her face look too angular or something.
I love the inside photos much better.
 
:unsure: I know I'll be in the minority but I think the cover is terrible, they've made her up to look a bit frightening :ninja:
 
:unsure: I know I'll be in the minority but I think the cover is terrible, they've made her up to look a bit frightening :ninja:

You're definitely not the first! The first three or four pages of this thread were people complaining about the cover! haha
I don't love it either... it's not awful but not great. Love the editorial though.
 
The UK Vanity Fair got a very condensed version of Dennis Hopper.
This issue has great content. As much as I enjoy reading Vanity Fair every month, my favorite is always More From the V.F. Mailbag. So damn funny & smart.
 
^^I haven't seen it either. I want it!
I don't think any August issues are on stands yet.
 
I am not blown away by the cover, but I don't find it objectionable either. However now that I have seen the photos, I think either this photo, this one or even this one would have been better choices as a standout magazine cover. The first one would have actually been a memorable cover for both VF's and Ms. Jolie's archives.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,445
Messages
15,262,088
Members
88,456
Latest member
Khunmax
Back
Top