Vanity Fair November 2012 : Daniel Craig by Annie Leibovitz

[t-rex]

By Annie Leibovitz

VanityFair.com

Apparently they actually arranged a shoot for their cover; though the naked gold woman looks like a satin ribbon Photoshopped behind some random photograph of Daniel Craig at an event.

 

[tigerrouge]

That cover shot is wrong on so many levels.
Posted via Mobile Device

 

[Miss Dalloway]

Hahah what a joke, none of the elements work here! And another MJ article? For crying out loud, give it a rest!

 

[iluvjeisa]

That cover shot is wrong on so many levels.
Posted via Mobile Device

Spot on.

So. Many. Levels.

 

[Melancholybaby]

HQ cover and a shot from the ed


vanityfair.com

 

[t-rex]

Horrible, might as well have used a nice photo of Michael Jackson instead.

 

[Chanelcouture09]

His facial expression looks a little demented.

 

[Flashbang]

James Bond in a suit is such a 'duh' moment for me. They should play it more with the cover. I don't know? naked?

 

[MON]

I thought that no one can do any wrong with Daniel... but VF proved me wrong

 

[BonesAndOil]

It took me a minute to figure out what that gold thing was behind his head...

This is, in a word, horrifying.

Whomever is in charge of approving cover content at this magazine needs to be fired and relocated to a job that doesn't require a creative input whatsoever.

 

[Flashbang]

Making of video: http://www.vanityfair.com/video/2012/10/1871376489001

 

[liberty33r1b]

I'm a Craig fan, but that has to be the worst vf cover ever

 

[GlamorousBoy]

oh god i am so tired of this james bond mania

 

[SugarMe]

For a cover attempt that's obviously trying to rely on sex to sell the magazine... there is really nothing sexy about it.

 

[justaguy]

Sometimes Annie just tries too hard.

 

[honeycombchild]

I find Daniel Craig so dull. He appears to have a single facial expression and comes off as a bit of a t*t in interviews to be perfectly honest. It's rather annoying that magazine editor's seem to believe every male cares about him simply because he's playing James Bond.

Yawn.

 

[YoninahAliza]

Good lord, this cover...because I just love the objectification of women! And yes, I do realize that "James Bond" is suppose to romance a lot of women but I would like to think that even he would oppose to such a terrible cover with it's awful message.

 

[Handbag Queen]

Yum!

 

[ad041715]

My god this is ridiculous. Worst cover... ever? I think so.

 

[blueorchid]

Good lord, this cover...because I just love the objectification of women! And yes, I do realize that "James Bond" is suppose to romance a lot of women but I would like to think that even he would oppose to such a terrible cover with it's awful message.

I didn't even realize it was a body at first, I thought it was some weird golden neck pillow thing.