Vogue Australia Feb 2006: Kate Moss

[lunabella]

she must be inside a bit for her style though. . . it says so on the cover.

 

[slingback]

she's ageless (not timeless)... literally - in my opinion she could easily pass for a 21 year old.

So true, and I think that might be part of the problem. If she had changed at all with age, she might be more interesting to look at.

 

[peacelover142002]

Who shot this and who is that dress by?

not sure who the photog is, but i think the dress is by alexander mcqueen, though i can't find it.

here's something similar:

style.com

 

[bp22]

I despise it when magazines do this, especially the past W cover with Karen Elson.

pretty poor form i'll say....

 

[lemeray]

she must be inside a bit for her style though. . . it says so on the cover.

NOTHING, nothing at all.

 

[lemeray]

The dress is by Alexander McQueen and photographed by her ex-bf Mario Sorrenti.

 

[jennifer~]

not sure who the photog is, but i think the dress is by alexander mcqueen, though i can't find it.

McQueen indeed, searched fall '05 under a hunch:

style.com

 

[metal-on-metal]

The dress is by Alexander McQueen and photographed by her ex-bf Mario Sorrenti.

How cheap of them to use a picked-up Sorrenti pic from months ago for a February issue featuring LAST FALL'S McQueen dress! So low-rent and pathetic!