W April 2005 : Lindsay Lohan by Michael Thompson | Page 3 | the Fashion Spot

W April 2005 : Lindsay Lohan by Michael Thompson

Thanks for the article Morgan.

And I really hope Lindsay doesn't do the reality show! .. geez louise... unless its a documentary style show on HBO or something...
 
hm... i usually cant stand her, but i really like the way she came off in that interview. anyone know how long she's staying in new orleans?
 
I thought Paris was on Vogue cover before...oh nevermind, it was Elle. I still like Elle though.
Don't like the photo of Lindsay, it looks more like it should be on the cover of Maxim or something... *sighs*
 
I think it was rather smart of W to put Lindsay Lohan on the cover, as one of this issue's cover stories is "Silicone Valley: The Periles and Pitfalls of the New Breast Implants". :lol:
 
I think Lindsay gets a bit of a bad rap. In all her interviews she's come off really genuine and I think that the kinda trashy image is just a phase.
 
morgan38 said:
Lohan won't undress for the camera either, which may incite collective chest-beating on the part of American men. But it's not because she has anything to hide. "They're totally real," she says of her breasts. "I will admit that when I first started to develop boobs, my friends were like, 'Oh my god, what happened, and are your boobs real?' Even me, I was in shock because I was so flat that when I got a chest, it was like, wow. And compared to the rest of my body they kind of, like, popped. And they sit up." She cups them with her hands and laughs. "But I'm young. I'm young and I only got my boobs, like, a year and a half ago, so of course they're going to look good. I love 'em."

.</FONT>

Yeah right .... they "popped". All I can say is UGH:yuk: :sick:
 
well,

I think that a lot of people are hard on her because, well, its REALLY easy to jump on the trashing-lohan bandwagon...bandwagons seem to be human nature. she has worn a lot of trashy things, and done a few questionable things as well, but anybody growing up in the eye of the media with tons of money and attention...well I wouldnt have wanted my growing pains splashed across the tabloids. and I actually think that she really is gorgeous....except for that hideous orange tan. but Ive seen pictures of even wonderfull women like Julia Roberts with too too orange tans ( Im sure some of you are gasping...and its not personal, because Julia is my favourite celebrity, if I had to pick one...)

it's easy to pick someone's faults apart if they are famous, rich, and talked about constantly..

and if a magazine makes a bad decision a few times on a cover (or, in MY opinion a bad decision) Im not going to fault them that... everyone makes errors in judgement!

;)
ps not trying to be catty, honest! just saying....
 
no no no.

i don't care if you like her as an actress, singer, whatever the hell she is now days.

(even though i NEVER have)

but

THE COVER OF W?!?!?!??! Am I MISSING something!?!?!?! Hello!!?!?!?! I thought W was supposed to be held in a higher regard than Teen Vogue!?!?!

This isn't just an error.. the Apocalypse is coming!
 
Please, models belong on such magazine's covers! However, I think it's a nice photo. Good for her.
 
Here's one of the pictures from W.

main_pict.jpg
 
^I like the concept of the photo, but I just don't think she pulls it off.
 
well theyve made her look really good on the pic, if i dint know it was her ..it wd be a great cover ~! LOL
 
Definetly not their best cover..from Kate to Lindsay...huge difference..
 
Natalia Vodianova
ph.Michael Thompson






scanned by me
 
After my karma compliment well...it seems I've topped out on expressing my gratitude :lol:. But this is one of my favourite Natalia eds so really, thank you very very very much for scanning it :heart::flower:.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
216,525
Messages
15,342,463
Members
90,209
Latest member
randorando
Back
Top