fee de foret
Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2010
- Messages
- 443
- Reaction score
- 4
WOW at them including a thirteen year old(millie bobby brown) in the "why tv is sexier then ever" list on the cover...disgusting
Share with us... Your Best & Worst Collections of Haute Couture F/W 2025.26
^I read that as "tv is hot right now", tv shows have great quality, equal to movies.
Not like the stars are sexy![]()
^I read that as "tv is hot right now", tv shows have great quality, equal to movies.
Not like the stars are sexy![]()
I know that it's propably because this magazine has one edit per issue but was it necessary to cram so many concepts at once. In one hand you've got that rejected Tim Walker set, in the other you've got pasty british kids playing around on a meisel-esque set and on the other you've got Anna Ewers in a wig. There are some nice pictures but nothing really great, personally I think that Edward just doesn't work with Jamie-who is so talented but benefits from a tighter direction. Considering Edward will now be an editor-in-chief its worrying that he isn't capable o trimming this edit down considering there are 3 shots that have serious composition issues and only bring down the overall quality of the edit.
On another note I love a slight blur on analogue photography but the B&W shots seem very awakard to me, especially the Comme one, the contrast is too low and as a result the details of the dress are non-existent.
The TV feature is up on the site.
I find the photography a tad bit boring...
https://www.wmagazine.com/gallery/hottest-television-actors-nicole-kidman-milo-ventimiglia