Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Magazines' started by Astrid21, Sep 8, 2003.
I gathered these from Popdirt.com. Sorry they're so small. I'll post bigger pictures later.
starring in an editorial with Guy Bourdin influenced faire
I.E rip off- same poses!!! sucking the soul photo after photo!!
just as or even more shameless as madonna 's crap
"Hollywood" video. i hate rip offs!!!!!!
find your own damn concepts people!!
the queen of ghetto vamps it up and tries pull off an edgy
vibe that falls flat with uninteresting appeal and glossy
80's vamp that is lost on the booty-fied boriqua
but, she looks ok !!
miles better than the LV ad ,for sure! thank god!!
enjoy the pics
*I merged the two topics.
I really like it
but its such a borin rip off
totally agree Lo
I don't like her hair this color. I'm also a little tired of this angle. We already know this side to Jennifer Lopez, ya know? I'm ready to see something a little more mature and beautiful. I remember Jennifer's last W cover they had her in a very similar ghetto-fab pose. Has anyone seen the ad for her new fragrance, Still? She doesn't look that bad, still silly, but not that bad.
I have the most recently published Bourdin book and this is just ridiculous. Almost all of those pictures can be directly traced back to his work. I know it's really his moment right now, but this is just overkill.
That ad makes me .
In the eye of the storm, I am STILL. . . Jennifer Lopez
That ad makes me .
In the eye of the storm, I am STILL. . . Jennifer Lopez[/b][/quote]
I agree that part is very nauseating, but I was talking about the actual picture. It's better than looking at her very much airbrushed, alien looking body.
The first thing I noticed about the ad for 'Still' - was the way she is holding her mouth. Anyone else notice that?
that was my piont exactly...... unthoughtful not
to mention disrespectful ...... influence is one thing
but to COPY shamelessly, W as a respected
fashion publication should be ashamed. JLO
probably had no clue
oh im sickened i tell discusted! i hate carbon copies
Who was the photographer? I'm assuming Michael Thompson.
the hair! the hair!
The cover . . . will do. Nothing much there and, yes, those editorial's look very 'Hollywood'. I hate it! Is W being bought by celebs to advertise themselves (i.e. Brit on their August issue trying to get sympathy from readers by telling them Justin 'deserted' her just in time for the release of her album this fall, coincidence I don't think so ) ?
Don´t like them, but W had the most talked about editorials this year: Madonna´s yoga poses, Britney´s dark pictures and interview where she admitted having sex with Justin, the full frontal nudes of Kate and now this....
theres somwthing abit odd about her cover and editorial i still prefer the lv esp the one of the bracellet
I like it...
But to me, anymore, it seems as if JLo is trying to hard. Anybody agree?
its called trying to have class when you have none
its called trying to have class when you have none[/b][/quote]
first Madonna, now J-lo, everybody's ripping off Guy Bourdin