Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Magazines' started by Meg, Aug 9, 2003.
Thank God!!! it is sooo painful, damn it
Thank God!!! it is sooo painful, damn it [/b][/quote]
Out or not,I'm not having that
I was sent the cover that is in full color, where she is looking straight on at the camera with a shy smile.
Is that what you think when you stand naked in front of a mirror? The human body is a beautiful thing!
Nudity is not porn - it is natural and beautiful and takes a great deal of guts and honesty to show yourself naked in your natural state.
As far as the Brazilian wax goes - I get one because I like having less "down there" but I'm done with the wax - I'm saving my money for laser hair removal.
I didn't mind the pics...
As far as the trimming is concerned, so let it be. The pics are au natural - so I think it'd be odd if she was all trimmed 'n propped for it. It'd take something away from the shot if it was all made up and prepared...
Hey, Kate is back in ads, but will she be walking on catwalks??
no way those pics dont look so appealing they shda hidden abit thats what they do in art
Why should they hide anything? Art is not about "hiding".
The pictures I've seen were anything but porn, just natural nakedness. She looks beautiful and relaxed.
Naked ? porn. Period.
chuck close took the pics
he is a world famous artist: read my review or W
those pics are beautiful, sexy, sensuous, hot, real, perfect, ....
anyone who is uncomfortable with those pics has major psychological hangups & is bringing their own shameful baggage to beautiful art.
those pics are hopt & sexy but also beautiful. sure shaving or waxing is necessary for stylish fashionistas but to say smthng that surface level about timeless art like close's pics is weird & irrelevant.
look at inez & vinoos kate-as-bride pics
they are wayyyy hot too: I love kates ruffled pantys & her discrtete wedding bouquet hiding her niceness.
three cheers for kate & W
cheer cheers cheers cheers
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I find those pics to be banal.
IMHO, I think these are not pornographic pictures. I dunno probably I'm matured and cultured to understand nudity is not always pornographic (Not saying you guys aren't). Also it's done it black and white and she's not in a 'let's f*ck big boy" position.
What I just don't get is why take a photo of Kate's vagina? It's so uninteresting, IMO!
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I find those pics to be banal. [/b][/quote]
Sooo, what pictures? The links at the top of the pages lead to Kate in beach-wear on a -well- beach, in color, no less ::: http://www.theplace.ru/forum/pics/kw20.jpg
Please update ze link?
where can i find these pics again?
that link is old....
Photographer: Michael Thompson
Stylist: Joe Zee
Models: Hannelore Knuts, Roos van Bosstraetten, Mariacarla Boscono & Michelle Valencourt
Make-Up: Sharon Dowsett
Hair: Kevin Ryan
Viva Las Vegas
Photographer: Juergen Teller
Stylist: Joe Zee
Model: Jessica Miller
Make-Up: d*ck Page
Hair: Luigi Murenu
^ Ugh I miss Jessica so much.