Now that Paris Fashion Week and the unveiling of the first
functionally interactive fashion and arts print review is behind us, I am back. For five minutes...
There is a lot of talent out there in the blogosphere. I trawl it myself when looking for fresh writing talent. And there is nothing wrong with presenting any pieces you have had published on established web log sites (Tip of the day: use this term to confuse luddite reactionaries like me) as 'published work'. They certainly amount to published work. They may be more valid in that sense than extracts from your own blogs...sorry...web logs.
There's a similar snobbery, for want of a better word for it, in play to that found in the book world concerning self-published works. The same applies to those showcase magazines published as visiting cards by art directors. The underlying feeling seems to be that if you have to publish yourself, then you're no good. In turn, this exposes the real problem in media in general, this being a failure to recognise good work regardless of the delivery system.
In conclusion, do set up your own blog. But you should be wary of presenting it as published work until such time as it carries weight in terms of having generated a following, otherwise you are simply providing decision-makers evaluating you in a line-up of other applicants with a pretext to filter you out before lunch, if you get my point.
I have a blog myself. It has nothing to do with fashion. It's about the illicit removal of a large and very valuable motorcycle collection from the home of an old gent I knew by the head shed of a prestigious club, who got into his house between his death in a hospice and his funeral and picked the place clean before his lawyers could get there and carry out inventory for probate. No newspaper was interested in the story and so, with the help of outraged club members,
we nailed them in this way. This explains the 'fan page' you will find when Googling me. But as they are semi-literate, they couldn't think og much to write...
Nonetheless, I applied strict, old-school journalistic standards in doing so, which is why it hasn't been closed down and why they haven't managed to find lawyers willing to sue me, despite being very, very rich. And that's the other problem or perceived problem with blogs, that even when the writing is good, the writer's sources and fact-checking abilities may well be unreliable. For instance, I have read bloggers whose prose seduced me but who later admitted to using Wikipedia as a primary source. Need I say more?
So, the trick is to install confidence in not just your readers - humans being rather like pigs, as Orwell reminded us, we will consume any old sludge that's put in front of us, knowing full-well what we are swallowing, if there is nothing better in the trough - but in your future clients. They might not put your name on their brochures, internal communications tools, ad campaigns and so on, but they will boast of having a "serious" writer on the job, someone who is an trend-former. Even if you are simply imposing a trend they have conceived in order to pay the rent/mortgage/ticket out of there.
In addition to crashing events and evenings for hand-shaking purposes, you should develop a fearless approach to calling up anyone about whom you intend to write in your blog. That is an important step in getting taken seriously. And don't take knock-backs personally. Remember that the PA or the secretary has orders to field calls and emails. So, charm them. Why do you think James Bond always got in to see his commander so easily? He made Miss Moneypenny smile. Get snotty with the gate-keepers and you will have to wait until Death takes them before you get through that obstacle.