Nike And Converse

purplelucrezia

Active Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2003
Messages
13,807
Reaction score
16
Firstly, I hope that this is the right spot. Secondly, I edited this a bit for appropriateness; nothing that would be too missed. And finally, I'm upset, since I'd been wanting to buy myself a pair for ages. However, I do know that we have a topic on the Blackspot brand, which are the same style, but against Nike.
Here's the article...

The Day Nike Took Over the World: Counter-Culture For Sale

So the selling price on a large chunk of Americana is 305 million dollars?  That was the price Nike paid to buy Converse.  Nike didn't just buy shoes, they bought years and years of history.  The infamous "Chuck Taylor" sneakers have been around for decades.  Although they were never intended to become the official shoe of the counter-culture, they did so, anyway. 

The rebels without a cause wore them back in the 50s.  It was a white T-shirt, with a pack of cigarettes rolled up in one sleeve, a leather jacket slung over the shoulder, a nice motorcycle and a pair of Converse All Stars.  In the sixties, the hippies took the shoes over.  The multi-colored splendor was a blast, to them.  They usually wore a different colored Converse on each foot.  For a while, the Converse All Star shoe became a groovy enhancement to the numerous acid trips taken by stinky people with no bras.  Finally, in the 70s, when the fabulous Ramones introduced "Punk Rock" to the world -- and reintroduced Converse All Stars -- the brand of shoe became the official footwear of the punk generation.  Punkers made the footwear their own, and they have kept them on their feet for nearly three decades (imagine the smell). 

There was a really scary time during the late 80s when pop-metal bands tried to steal the Converse idea from the punks.  Twisted Sister's Dee Snider wore a pair of pink Chuck Taylor's in the embarrassingly pathetic "Hot Love" video.  The video flopped, the record ("Love is For Suckers") bombed, and Dee most likely never put on a pair of Converse again.  At least not the pink kind.  You see, headbangers were generally a confused lot, back in the day.  They damned Dee as a "******" for wearing pink shoes, even though they worshipped him in full mascara mode, a couple of years earlier.  

After metal turned into grunge, and all of those greasy grunge people wore Converse All Stars out in a way that only a basketball player with acne's foot could, the shoes became hugely trendy. Every dork wishing to be Kurt Cobain had the sneakers, along with that stupid chain thingie that hung from their belt to their wallet.  It was at that time that I almost felt trendy wearing the shoes, but I kept them on, nonetheless, because you don't get better than a canvas Converse.

During the last couple of years, the "nu-metal" bands have tied the shoes onto their feet.  It's frightening to watch Headbanger's Ball on MTV 2.  Almost all of those guttural growling people are wearing my favorite shoes.  They scream and grown and sound sort of like they're constipated, and then the camera pans down to reveal that they're wearing Converse.  Is it just me, or does the new Ball suck harder than the last one?  I didn't think it was possible, but it seems to be out-sucking one of the suckiest suckfests on MTV.  I'd rather watch Dee in his pink Chuck Taylor's, singing about "Hot Love," than hear these crunchy guitars and Cookie Monster vocals that sound exactly the same from song to song and band to band.

But now none of us can feel "rebellious."  Even people trying to sound like Cookie Monster.  The footwear of the counter-culture was bought out by one of the meanest, richest, greediest, lowly corporations in the business.  Nike.  Yikes.  Have these freaks EVER made a shoe in the United States?  I sincerely doubt it.  So, I have the Converse I have, and that's the entire collection of Converse that I'll ever be blessed with.  Never, ever, not in a million years, will I buy a Nike product.  Never have.  Never will.  Even if said product is a Converse All Star.

I bought my first pair of red Converse way back in 1988.  Yes, I was a young punk teenager at the time, and I was desperately trying to clone the Ramones (only two years later, I bought my first leather jacket).  But it felt right.  Maybe I was imitating something to make myself feel original, but the shoes bloody fit.  And if the shoe f*cking fits, wear it.  What teenager doesn't try to emulate their heroes (see the Cobain clones)? 

Then I grew up (sort of), but I never grew out of Converse All Stars.  I went through almost every color of the rainbow (not that I have any idea what the colors in a rainbow are).  Red, black, blue, green, light blue, white.  I never did buy a pink pair, because I didn't want that Dee Snider curse. 

I did get away with wearing my Chuck's to a wedding, where I was the best man.  I took my black pair of Converse and spray-painted some black crap over the beautiful blue star, and had Converse on, along with my tux, as I presented the coveted ring.  A few people noticed, but I didn't give a damn.  These were the shoes that I was planning on wearing for a lifetime, and nothing, outside of some quick snatch in the sack, was gonna get them off of me.

Nike is now the proud owner of the Chuck Taylor sneakers that have been worn on the feet of discriminating counter-culture freaks for nearly a century.  Nike now plans to market these infamous shoes in revolutionary stores such as "Target" and "Wal-Mart."  If they get really bold, maybe they'll even put them up for sale at "K-Mart."  I'm sure the price will be jacked up from $35.00 to around $150.00.  Of course the price will be "justified," due to the shoes being "special edition" Converse All Stars, with glowing crap in the back, and Michael Jordan's name plastered all over the canvas.  Maybe they'll make Chuck Taylor golfing shoes, with Tiger Woods' face in place of the famous star. 

Converse has always been synonymous with rebellion.  Converse has always belonged to the counter-culture (it's ironic they were actually meant to be athletic shoes).  I'm sure some overpaid dildo will invent an ad featuring every punk band wearing the shoes, with a tagline reading something like, "Be punk.  Be Converse.  Be Independent."  I'm sure the little sh*ts in the world will fall for it.  I never will.  When you corporate whores turn Converse into the next "Guess," guess what?  Those of us in the know won't be buying. 

Rest in Peace, Converse.  And remember, Nike -- paying people in foreign countries twenty-five cents an hour isn't punk.  You're not punk, Nike.  You're not metal.  You're not anything.  Get a life and live it, losers.

juicycerebellum.com
 
Yes, I realize that this is old news, but I checked and there wasn't a topic.

Nike Swooshes In On Converse

NEW YORK - Nike put Converse out of its misery today, agreeing to purchase the 95-year-old company for $305 million, plus the assumption of certain liabilities. 
   
Converse, which makes the classic Chuck Taylor All Star basketball shoe and the Jack Purcell tennis shoe, has been struggling for years as Nike (nyse: NKE - news - people ) and Reebok International (nyse: RBK - news - people ) dominated the sneaker market and casual footwear from Skechers (nyse: SKX - news - people ) and Timberland (nyse: TBL - news - people ) and retro styles from Puma (otc: PMMAY - news - people ) and Adidas became more popular.

Such basketball greats as Larry Bird, Dr. J and Magic Johnson wore Converse and the Chuck Taylor became an American icon with 750 million pairs sold in 144 countries in its 80-year history. But the shoes were sidelined by pros and fans and the North Andover, Mass., based footwear firm filed for bankruptcy in 2001. Later that year, private investors bought the company, but it was too late.

Meanwhile, Nike was signing up the coolest athletes to endorse its shoes, basing an entire apparel line on Michael Jordan and recently signing on the National Basketball Association's newest hope LeBron James. For fiscal 2003, Nike reported revenue of $10.7 billion compared with Converse's full-year 2002 sales of $205 million. There was no way for the struggling firm to get back in the game.

forbes.com
 
Nike's taking over the world :(

Do you know why this happened? Was Converse going out of business?
 
Originally posted by chocsta@Sep 13 2004, 09:52 AM
Nike's taking over the world :(

Do you know why this happened? Was Converse going out of business?
[snapback]365753[/snapback]​
If you read the article, it tells you that they were going bankrupt. :flower:
 
I wouldn't say the ramones introduced pun to the world :innocent: but whatever

Nike is scarey, i lik ethere shoes though :ninja:
 
Originally posted by Spacemiu@Sep 13 2004, 02:20 PM


Nike is scarey, i lik ethere shoes though :ninja:

[snapback]366108[/snapback]​

me too :mrgreen:
 
Originally posted by LolitaLuxe@Sep 13 2004, 05:22 PM
me too :mrgreen:
[snapback]366163[/snapback]​
I personally think they're hideous, even without the sweatshop element. :yuk:
 
Augh!!! I love it!! Now I can make fun of the kids that are "anti-corporation" that wear Chucks :rofl:
 
i just had a bad feeling from the begining of this article
 
I have my Chuckies on right now....not for rebellion, but 'cause I like them...hmmmm......Nike taking over right. I hope they will not spray NIKE allover the shoes :unsure:
 
Originally posted by Mr-Dale@Sep 15 2004, 01:16 PM
I have my Chuckies on right now....not for rebellion, but 'cause I like them...hmmmm......Nike taking over right. I hope they will not spray NIKE allover the shoes :unsure:
[snapback]368209[/snapback]​
Keep in mind that it depends on when you bought them too. :flower:
 
It's quite sad that Nike had to take over. Though I'll still wear them(and love them) I knew it was going downhill when I saw some with covered with anarchy symbols and red "punk" :lol: :lol:
 
Sad to read that Nike have taken over Converse and that the Chuck Taylor's may be marketed in, of all places...Target?! :huh:
 
Nike took over a while ago.. I believe chucks were a little cheaper beforehand... Yeah converse went bankrupt a long time ago.. They sold them for a dollar or so back when that happened
 
:( I love Converse. They're so visually pleasing, shich I just can't say about so many sneaker-type shoes. I've wanted a pair for a long time, but a bunch of people at my school wear them and they feel a bit too trendy at the moment. But they're so pretty... What do you guys think? Is it lame to get them now?
 
i love converse! at least i have a pair of genuine converse shoes though... {not nikes}
 
I don't get Nike, their sudden interested in Converse shoes, a "concept" that differs so much from Nike shoes, seems inappropriate (if you don't include monnetary reasons). :rolleyes: But it seems like a really smart move. Converse are now getting really popular among the trendsetters (and followers )crowd.
 
Originally posted by eloes@Sep 16 2004, 10:40 PM
:( I love Converse. They're so visually pleasing, shich I just can't say about so many sneaker-type shoes. I've wanted a pair for a long time, but a bunch of people at my school wear them and they feel a bit too trendy at the moment. But they're so pretty... What do you guys think? Is it lame to get them now?
[snapback]369866[/snapback]​


If you really love them, buy them. It doesn't matter if they're trendy; it would be more lame for you not to buy something you really liked because a lot of people have them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,758
Messages
15,126,892
Members
84,487
Latest member
slimshelly
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->