Shopping Magazines

stylegurrl

Active Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
1,452
Reaction score
3
Does anyone read/subscribe? Do you find them useful?

Magazine Spotlight: Shop Etc. Versus Lucky

By Michael Shields
Monday, August 09, 2004


One magazine is dedicated entirely to shopping, with page after page of product-related blurbs and lots of pictures of clothes. The other magazine--well, it's focused on shopping, and it features lots of clothes. Is there any difference?

In the first issue of Hearst's Shop Etc., a letter from Editor Mandi Norwood calls the magazine "the only one-stop shopping magazine for fashion, home, and beauty."

Norwood goes on to say that "we've fallen in love with shopping all over again." That may be true, but Conde Nast's Lucky might argue that the love has never gone away, and that it has been doing a pretty good job of providing women with a guide to shopping for fashion and beauty products for four years.

In fact, Lucky has been more than lucky of late. It just raised its rate base to 1 million, a 100 percent increase since the magazine's launch in December 2000. In Audit Bureau of Circulation reports, Lucky regularly beats its rate base, and its newsstand (+18.1 percent in 2004) and subscriptions (+15.6 percent), have each grown consistently.

Of course, any launch from Hearst cannot be underestimated. The company's president, Cathleen Black, has said that Shop Etc., which debuts on newsstands nationwide on August 17, will use "a sophisticated and stylish approach that is fresh and innovative."

"The whole reader-to-retail genre has really taken off with consumers, and we felt the time was right to launch a magazine at Hearst entirely dedicated to shopping," said Black.

There is no doubt that this relatively new magazine concept--the pure consumerist play--has proven to be a hot one for advertisers. And Shop Etc.is being marketed wisely.

But editorially, is there any real difference?

Shop Etc.--which will be published three times in 2004 before increasing its frequency to 10 issues in 2005 (its rate base is 400,000 to start)--appears to be going after a slightly older and well-off target audience. The magazine isn't afraid to showcase some pricey stuff. In its Personal Shopper section, a model shows off a $10,200 Cartier watch and a $1,600 jacket (there are less expensive options on subsequent pages).

Lucky appears to feature more youthful brands and less expensive apparel (although MediaDailyNews' analysis is hardly scientific).

One point of differentiation for Shop Etc. is that it has a section on home furnishings, something that Lucky really doesn't offer. Included in Shop Etc.'s debut issue are flat panel TVs and couches, and kitchen gadgets (such as espresso makers).

Of course, Lucky's cover always features a celebrity and a brief feature that covers subjects' shopping passions (September has Milla Jovovich). In contrast, Shop Etc.'s first cover shows an unknown woman from the shoulders down, while callouts point out the prices of her dress, handbag, shoes, and something called "body shimmer," while alerting readers to the page on which they can find these items.

The prospect of another Lucky-like success--as well as Conde's marketing clout--has clearly convinced advertisers that Shop Etc. is worth a try. The premiere issue features 97 ad pages from companies including Estee Lauder, L'Oréal, Saks Fifth Avenue, and Prada, and even non-endemic brands like Visa and Home Depot.

Certainly, there are many examples of readers and advertisers supporting similarly themed women's magazines. Us Weekly and In Touch both mine essentially the same concept, and both have been on fire of late. In the men's magazine world, think Maxim, Stuff, and FHM.

Perhaps an even better comparison example can be found online, as each of these books seems more closely modeled after the online shopping experience, rather than print magazines. There, Yahoo! Shopping, MSN's eShop, and AOL's Shop@AOL each provide pretty much the same thing, and each has business relationships with major retailers that are thriving.

Media Daily News
 
Lucky is fun to flip through, but it's very mainstream
 
I subscribe to Cargo (hey, it was only $2.99 a year) which is supposed to he male version of Lucky. I've never read Lucky so I can't attest to that, but the style that is displayed in Cargo is pretty bad. Haggar pants :(

I like to read it more for the tech stuff. They also have some interesting information about skincare...nothing groundbreaking, but good subway reading material. This month, they did a nice review of stereos, and in the clothing section a nice layout on boots.

I think the magazine is doing fairly well though.
 
I like Lucky... it's a good flipthrough.. but hardly anything worth "reading".
 
Originally posted by souperbait00@Aug 18 2004, 02:46 AM
guess i'm the only one who enjoys Lucky.
[snapback]336745[/snapback]​

I have been a subscriber since the beginning. I enjoy the magazine personally. I think it's great to have the purchasing information readily available and I like it when they do the features that show the good shops in a particular city.
 
I like Lucky but I don't find it that useful. I kinda feel like its a little fashion behind...
 
i don't care for Lucky mag either. it's not as good as they build it up to be IMO. there's another magazine out and it's all about shopping. it's call Shop magazine. the cover has a lady walking in a red dress and the latest marc jacobs in red. it's pretty cheap, i may go get it just to see if it's good.
 
Originally posted by TheSweetest@Aug 18 2004, 10:11 PM
i don't care for Lucky mag either. it's not as good as they build it up to be IMO. there's another magazine out and it's all about shopping. it's call Shop magazine. the cover has a lady walking in a red dress and the latest marc jacobs in red. it's pretty cheap, i may go get it just to see if it's good.
[snapback]337944[/snapback]​

hahaha...did you even read the article...it's about the two magazines!!!...you're funny...!!!

i'm curious about the new mag...i liked lucky in the beginning...but i think it's just too mainstream for me now...all the options are the same to me...so they aren't really 'options'...just repetitive...

maybe this new one will be better... :unsure:
 
I enjoy looking at Lucky, and even though the article states "Lucky" features less-expensive apparel, there are still quite a few items that range from $400-$500 and up in there, which is way too expensive for me. Anyway, it's a fun flip-through, and they have some cute stuff.
 
I just got the first issue of Shop Etc., and I think it's lousy. The fashion section is super-short, and they do the same things as Marie Claire (Get this look for Alot or a Little, etc.) Lucky has much more fashion coverage and do more with up and coming designers. The features in Shop are on Coach and Donna Karan's new home furnishings line. Like I haven't read that before!

The only thing I liked were the coupons, for Armani Exchange, Sephora, etc.
 
The Japanese have a lot of shopping magazines. Aimed at various brands like Vivienne Westwood, Gucci, YSL or Louis Vuitton. They also have these compendiums.
 
used to work with lucky so was forced to read it!!!
its quite good :flower:
 
i like lucky--it is a super-colorful, bright, easy-read magazine that's fun to look through. i like the simple format and the guides with tons of shoes or handbags or whatever that month's item is. it isn't necessarily as fashion-foward as Vogue---but it's more about practical things to make women look good. it's fun
 
i used to subscribe to lucky...never quite knew why, so i cancelled my subscription...it really is useless
 
Im agree, we are subscribe to lucky and from all the magazines we receive at the showroom its maybe the only one ( maybe Allure too ) who stay in its plastic bag
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,767
Messages
15,127,248
Members
84,493
Latest member
velvetmuse
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->