America Reads Less

faust

Active Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2004
Messages
10,231
Reaction score
4
It is no secret that the US has an inferior bad public education system and cultural develpment, and the below article makes me very sad.

From NYTimes

Fewer Noses Stuck in Books in America, Survey Finds
By BRUCE WEBER

Oprah's Book Club may help sell millions of books to Americans, and slam poetry may have engendered a youthful new breed of wordsmith, but the nation is still caught in a tide of indifference when it comes to literature. That is the sobering profile of a new survey to be released today by the National Endowment for the Arts, which describes a precipitous downward trend in book consumption by Americans and a particular decline in the reading of fiction, poetry and drama.

The survey, called "Reading at Risk," is based on data from "The Survey of Public Participation in the Arts," conducted by the Census Bureau in 2002. Among its findings are that fewer than half of Americans over 18 now read novels, short stories, plays or poetry; that the consumer pool for books of all kinds has diminished; and that the pace at which the nation is losing readers, especially young readers, is quickening. In addition it finds that the downward trend holds in virtually all demographic areas.

"What this study does is give us accurate numbers that support our worst fears about American reading," said Dana Gioia, the chairman of the endowment, who will preside over a discussion of the survey results at the New York Public Library this morning. "It quantifies what people have been observing anecdotally, but the news is that it has been happening more rapidly and more pervasively than anyone thought possible. Reading is in decline among all groups, in every region, at every educational level and within every ethnic group," he said, calling the survey results "deeply alarming."

The study, with its stark depiction of how Americans now entertain, inform and educate themselves, does seem likely to fuel debate over issues like the teaching and encouragement of reading in schools, the financing of literacy programs and the prevalence in American life of television and the other electronic media that have been increasingly stealing time from readers for a couple of generations at least. It also raises questions about the role of literature in the contemporary world.

The survey also makes a striking correlation between readers of literature and those who are socially engaged, noting that readers are far more likely than nonreaders to do volunteer and charity work and go to art museums, performing arts events and ballgames. "Whatever good things the new electronic media bring, they also seem to be creating a decline in cultural and civic participation," Mr. Gioia said. "Of literary readers, 43 percent perform charity work; only 17 percent of nonreaders do. That's not a subtle difference."

Still, in a world where information is more readily available than ever, where people know more than they ever have, and where visual acuity is becoming ever more crucially utilitarian, it is worth asking: What, if anything, does literature's diminished importance to Americans represent? The study has already produced conflicting reactions.

"It's not just unfortunate, it's real cause for concern," said James Shapiro, a professor of English at Columbia University. "A culture gets what it pays for, and if we think democracy depends on people who read, write, think and reflect — which is what literature advances — then we have to invest in what it takes to promote that."

On the other hand Kevin Starr, librarian emeritus for the state of California and a professor of history at the University of Southern California, said that if close to 50 percent of Americans are reading literature, "that's not bad, actually."

"In an age where there's no canon, where there are so many other forms of information, and where we're returning to medieval-like oral culture based on television," he said, "I think that's pretty impressive, quite frankly." Mr. Starr continued: "We should be alarmed, I suppose, but the horse has long since run out of the barn. There are two distinct cultures that have evolved, and by far the smaller is the one that's tied up with book and high culture. You can get through American life and be very successful without anybody ever asking you whether Shylock is an anti-Semitic character or whether `Death in Venice' is better than `The Magic Mountain.' "

The Census Bureau study upon which the survey was based measured the number of adult Americans who attended live performances of theater, music, dance and other arts; visited museums; watched broadcasts of arts programs; or read literature in the past year. The survey sample — 17,135 people — makes it one of the largest studies ever conducted on the subject of arts participation, and the data were compared with similar studies from 1982 and 1992. In the literature segment respondents were asked whether they had, during the previous 12 months, without the impetus of a school or work assignment, read any novels, short stories, poems or plays in their leisure time.

Their answers show that just over half — 56.6 percent — read a book of any kind in the previous year, down from 60.9 percent a decade earlier. Readers of literature fell even more precipitously, to 46.7 percent of the adult population, down from 54 percent in 1992 and 56.9 percent in 1982, which means that in the last decade the erosion accelerated significantly. The literary reading public lost 5 percent of its girth between 1982 and 1992; another 14 percent dropped away in the following decade. And though the number of readers of literature is about the same now as it was in 1982 — about 96 million people — the American population as a whole has increased by almost 40 million.

The survey found that men (37.6 percent) were doing less literary reading than women (55.1 percent); that Hispanics (26.5 percent) were doing less than African-Americans (37.1 percent) and whites (51.4 percent); but that all categories were declining. The steepest declines of any demographic group are among the youngest adults. In 1982, 59.8 percent of 18-to-24-year-olds read literature; by 2002 that figure had dropped to 42.8 percent. In the 25-to-34 age group, the percentage of literary readers dropped to 47.7 from 62.1 over the same period.

"This won't be news to publishers," said Jim Milliott, senior editor for news at the trade journal Publishers Weekly. "It just confirms what we've known from other fragmented surveys all along."

Last month the Association of American Publishers released worldwide sales figures for 2003, indicating that total sales of consumer book products increased 6 percent for the year. Much of the increase can be accounted for by sales of audio books, juvenile titles and nonpaper e-books, sold online. Adult hardbound books, adult paperbacks and mass-market paperbacks all showed relatively flat revenues, in spite of price increases.

The one category of book to rise markedly was that of religious texts, with total sales of $337.9 million, 36.8 percent over the previous year.

 
oh... i think that article is too long for me to read.... :innocent:


;) :lol:
 
sad.
scary.
I have to say, it doesn't surprise me though.
 
Originally posted by softgrey@Jul 8th, 2004 - 11:46 am
oh... i think that article is too long for me to read.... :innocent:


;) :lol:
:lol: Softie, you know there are people who think that's too much to read :wacko:
 
Originally posted by softgrey@Jul 8th, 2004 - 11:46 am
oh... i think that article is too long for me to read.... :innocent:


;) :lol:
:lol:
 
Originally posted by strawberry daiquiri@Jul 8th, 2004 - 1:12 pm
Let me go off-topic and ask has anyone ever read this?
I haven't read the book, but it's nothing new - it's discussed in some statistics and finance classes. I don't think it takes away from the original post though. At least not for me, because I see the same thing every day.
 
Originally posted by TheSoCalledPrep+Jul 8th, 2004 - 1:05 pm--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (TheSoCalledPrep @ Jul 8th, 2004 - 1:05 pm)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-softgrey@Jul 8th, 2004 - 11:46 am
oh... i think that article is too long for me to read.... :innocent:


;) :lol:
:lol: Softie, you know there are people who think that's too much to read :wacko: [/b][/quote]
i know...and i confess...i actually didn't read it...
i don't want to get depressed right now...i'll save it for later when i can tolerate it...
so many things to worry about... :wacko:

:doh: ...UM...look at the pretty couture...!!!... :innocent: :woot: ;)
 
Originally posted by softgrey+Jul 8th, 2004 - 1:24 pm--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (softgrey @ Jul 8th, 2004 - 1:24 pm)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by TheSoCalledPrep@Jul 8th, 2004 - 1:05 pm
<!--QuoteBegin-softgrey
@Jul 8th, 2004 - 11:46 am
oh... i think that article is too long for me to read.... :innocent:


;)  :lol:

:lol: Softie, you know there are people who think that's too much to read :wacko:
i know...and i confess...i actually didn't read it...
i don't want to get depressed right now...i'll save it for later when i can tolerate it...
so many things to worry about... :wacko:

:doh: ...UM...look at the pretty couture...!!!... :innocent: :woot: ;) [/b][/quote]
I know... it boggled my mind. 56% had not read a book of ANY KIND? Not even just a lil paperback?? I find that so hard to comprehend, as I feel bad that I only get to about a book a month.
 
This is so sad...I know theres a lot of people who dont read unless necessary but I didnt know it was this much.

Like my half brothers play PS2, Gamecube and X-box all day as soon as they are home...whenever I do visit them sometimes I try to get the oldest to talk to me about books he read or try to get him to read with me. He's a work in progress but the younger one I feel like tying him up with the damn Playstation cords and making him read. I'm sorry but no matter that they arent close with me I don't want anyone stupid in the family.
 
I didn't read it. Seemed like a lot of words and stuff. Frankly I didn't even wanna click on the topic. It must be true. :(
 
I used to love reading when I was little.. now I hardly read... I dont read the newspaper.. Just look at CNN online or something.. does that count :unsure:
 
I'm doing my level best to skew the trend back in the right direction. I probably go through 5 books a week on average. Fiction, non-fiction, and even sometimes poetry. Complicated highbrow lit, dumb chickie books, philosophy, histories of cussing, how-tos on furniture refinishing, and fairie tales about trolls. I've been reading like a little maniac since I was 7 and would probably roll over and die of boredom if I couldn't go to the library every Saturday morning.

Why don't more people read? No annoying commercials like TV, way cheaper than movies, and much more potential variety than in video games.

The thing that chaps my *** about that article is that the correlate reading with participation in other fine arts, and frankly it makes me envious. I'd love to be one of those people who goes to the ballet and to plays and such, but it is so expensive, and I can't afford to go. I do go to museums a lot, on the free days, or to the ones that only cost maybe a few dollars to go in.

I think patronage of the fine arts would be a lot broader if it were more financially accessible. There are plenty of us out there who'd love to go hear a concert of Stravinsky music, but can't pony up the $50 for tickets. The library, at least, is free, and secondhand books are cheap. That much I can manage.
 
when I was 7, I read about 4-5 books a day..
now it's like 1 :blush:
 
I read... a LOT. My room looked like a library before I moved and sold everything I owned. I had upwards of 3,000 books. All of which I had read. and thats just the books I have bought, not counting the ones I took out from the library or sat and read in the bookstore...

not all americans dislike reading. its my favorite past time.
 
Originally posted by As You Like It@Jul 9th, 2004 - 5:20 am
I'm doing my level best to skew the trend back in the right direction. I probably go through 5 books a week on average. Fiction, non-fiction, and even sometimes poetry. Complicated highbrow lit, dumb chickie books, philosophy, histories of cussing, how-tos on furniture refinishing, and fairie tales about trolls. I've been reading like a little maniac since I was 7 and would probably roll over and die of boredom if I couldn't go to the library every Saturday morning.

Why don't more people read? No annoying commercials like TV, way cheaper than movies, and much more potential variety than in video games.

The thing that chaps my *** about that article is that the correlate reading with participation in other fine arts, and frankly it makes me envious. I'd love to be one of those people who goes to the ballet and to plays and such, but it is so expensive, and I can't afford to go. I do go to museums a lot, on the free days, or to the ones that only cost maybe a few dollars to go in.

I think patronage of the fine arts would be a lot broader if it were more financially accessible. There are plenty of us out there who'd love to go hear a concert of Stravinsky music, but can't pony up the $50 for tickets. The library, at least, is free, and secondhand books are cheap. That much I can manage.
I concur. Also, I doubt they would count reading the newspaper, TFS, reading stories online... as 'reading'. But it is. I have learned more online than anywhere else. The WWW connects me to the entire world, just as books do. Magazines and periodicals also are great wealths of information.

All of this must be taken into consideration. There are millions of people who read the paper every morning and are very informed. That should count for something. :)
 
I'm sure reading is declining everywhere and it makes me sad.
A few months back I noticed that I haven't picked up anything fiction (textbooks etc don't count) for a while so I dug out my library card and I'm back with books. I guess I read the most when I was 13 - 16.
As softie's sig says: change what you cannot accept :flower:
 
Originally posted by prixi@Jul 9th, 2004 - 5:24 am
when I was 7, I read about 4-5 books a day..
now it's like 1 :blush:
One book every day? Maaaan, you're good!!! :smartass: :smartass: :clap:
 
Originally posted by oanadobre@Jul 9 2004, 09:39 AM
One book every day? Maaaan, you're good!!! :smartass: :smartass: :clap:
[snapback]310137[/snapback]​

:lol:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,901
Messages
15,242,147
Members
87,852
Latest member
oberoiman
Back
Top