Baby Phat - The Campaign Archive | Page 3 | the Fashion Spot
  • MODERATOR'S NOTE: Please can all of theFashionSpot's forum members remind themselves of the Forum Rules. Thank you.

Baby Phat - The Campaign Archive

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 1957
  • Start date Start date
I've never felt SO insulted in my life by any other ad as this ones.
(If asking why, it's the maid)
I swear to God if I ever see Kimora, she'll be humbled!
 
I now understand why Janice couldn't stand Kimora. She is such a show-off and I HATE people who show up worthy material (father :rolleyes:). Her ads just scream see Im rich and look at how Im living yet I still wear my cheap *** Walmart clothes :rolleyes:. I dont understand what the maid is doing in their unless they also open a line of maidswear.
 
It's not only hip-hop stars that wear Baby Phat. She has customers of many different backgrounds believe it or not.

How is her airbrushing different than *any* other celebrity featured in magazines?
 
I LOVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Baby PhAt clothing.
I'm saving to buy a lot of clothing from there.
 
EEEWWW OH GOD she is so gross. What were they thinking, putting the poor maid in there?! Sometimes I wonder...do these people not SEE themselves at all, do they not realize how stupid and trashy and stuck up they appear to the rest of the world.
 
Who conceives these ads? It looks like Kimora is ignoring her daughter's outstretched hand and the maid on the stairs isn't watching where she's putting her foot. :shock: And the 2 maids look like twins. Weird. But Kimora does look sort of more glam in this one.
 
What i don't like is she copies things from couture designers and makes a tacky street version...she needs to stop...she wouldn't have ever been a designer if her husband wasn't Simmons. :wacko:
 
I think she is trying to make a statement with the maid in the picture.

Not a good or valid one.

In conclusion she and her husband are former slummers who got lucky and made money.
 
Originally posted by MayaPapaya9@Jul 17 2004, 11:48 PM
Her kids are cute though!
[snapback]312713[/snapback]​
That pic is so dumb? Why does she include the maids? I can't explain it but it is so stupid
 
Originally posted by princess_tess@Jul 18 2004, 03:43 AM
That pic is so dumb? Why does she include the maids? I can't explain it but it is so stupid
[snapback]312849[/snapback]​


Isn't it obvious?

All the maids used in the ads are latina women. She is stereotyping.
 
The more I look at the photos I see that her face is fat. That fat face should be accompanied with a larger body, no?
 
Originally posted by CelineChic@Jul 18 2004, 03:45 AM
Isn't it obvious?

All the maids used in the ads are latina women. She is stereotyping.
[snapback]312850[/snapback]​


Of course I noticed that!! But it's just hard to understand the logic BEHIND why she included the element in the ads. :unsure:
 
Originally posted by CelineChic@Jul 18 2004, 04:45 AM
Isn't it obvious?

All the maids used in the ads are latina women. She is stereotyping.

How can she be stereotyping if these are her actual maids? The January 04 Harper's Bazaar KM article features photographs around her home and we see these same women as in the current campaign.

I think Baby Phat is a hoochie, ghetto and trashy tee and jeans business with a runway show thrown in to get press. Awful clothes and therefore these are awful ads. However KM looks great in non-Baby Phat clothes and I don't judge her luxurious lifestyle. She seems to be a girl having fun.
 
She should have hired a model. And I don't understand the maids... why are they there? They aren't wearing the clothes. Not unless Baby Phat came out with a line of maid wear.
 
Originally posted by SCBlondie@Jul 18 2004, 12:14 PM
She should have hired a model. And I don't understand the maids... why are they there? They aren't wearing the clothes. Not unless Baby Phat came out with a line of maid wear.
[snapback]313028[/snapback]​


:rofl: :rofl:

You never fail to make me smile, SC
 
Originally posted by Atelier@Jul 18 2004, 11:03 AM
How can she be stereotyping if these are her actual maids? The January 04 Harper's Bazaar KM article features photographs around her home and we see these same women as in the current campaign.

I think Baby Phat is a hoochie, ghetto and trashy tee and jeans business with a runway show thrown in to get press. Awful clothes and therefore these are awful ads. However KM looks great in non-Baby Phat clothes and I don't judge her luxurious lifestyle. She seems to be a girl having fun.
[snapback]312995[/snapback]​

They are not her actual maids. I've read two articles saying that they were hired to play maids for Kimora's ads.

Remember she lives in Jersey not California ;)
 
She should have hired a model. And I don't understand the maids... why are they there? They aren't wearing the clothes. Not unless Baby Phat came out with a line of maid wear.

:lol:

Anyway, the ads are terrible, the clothes that the "maids" are wearing look nicer than the crap that Kimora threw on her own body, and the air-brushing could not be more obvious. Kimora Lee Simmons was the "muse" (or whatever) of Karl Lagerfield of Chanel for years (supposedly.) She couldn't have picked a thing or two up about style from him in the time she was gadding about with him? Bah. :doh:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,064
Messages
15,247,998
Members
88,078
Latest member
loser
Back
Top