It's interesting to get a look at what we consider "beautiful", it varies so crazily. It's one thing to have a set of perfectly-proportioned/culturally-approved facial and bodily features, but IMO for me to consider someone beautiful, there has to be something behind the eyes - some personality, really.
Being interesting - expressed through style, demeanour, even the way you carry yourself- is probably a bigger factor in beauty, in some ways, than just having nice hair, big eyes, full lips, a neat/smallish nose, pointed chin and pronounced cheekbones (some common features I notice with most people who are considered good-looking today). It's probably why I'd rather look at Angelina Jolie than Aishwarya Rai - the former transcended her own good looks ages ago and at least has some hint of a personality that she expresses through her style, the latter.... she's got an amazing face, but is utterly bland as far as personality and taste go.
In all honesty, I think I'm a bigger fan of the slightly flawed kind of looks than the "perfect" ones - I don't know how to put this, but sometimes women with conventionally perfect faces/appearances don't really push themselves, style-wise, and end up coming off rather boring. Natalie Portman, for instance, was far more interesting to look at when she shaved her head/had short hair than she is now - it made her stand out from the pack, now she just looks like another pretty Hollywood star (though I get that long hair is the convention, and it's probably easier for work purposes etc).
