but assuming that you would in fact have only one shot, I wouldn't choose an MJ bag because despite as long as they've been around, I don't think of them as "classic" bags. if I had to have only one I would pick balenciaga, but that's just me. in order to seriously play the "what if" game we need more information about you (your style, your budget, etc..)
Big bags are the trend these days and don't worry, small girls can still get away with carrying big bags. Hope this helps?Jujube22 said:But I do agree with Meeyowsa, if I could have *only one* handbag this year (one handbag in my lifetime is kinda severe), I would get a Balenciaga bag. But then again, I like anything as long as it doesn't have logos plastered all over i.e. Louis Vuitton.
I just don't have the money to splurge 1000 on a handbag every year. Up to 200 is what I normally pay for my handbags.
Hate to admit it but the LV Speedy was the like the second bag I purchased after getting that first MJ bag...and I don't even use it anymore. Even though I bought it from Eluxury, people would either ask me where I got my fake or just stare because it is weird to see a college student carrying around an LV.MJCouture said:One in a lifetime? Chanel. Nothing else to say. A Balenciaga is no more classic than a MJ, both are going to be over within the next 3-7 years. You are talking about a real investment bag, which means you need something that has been around for a long time, and will not out anytime soon, so like I said, Chanel.
the blake is very simple and young which is also good in your price range. i found that the venetia satchel is way too big for me when i went to see it in person ( considering i am 5'1 ) Anyway, i think it's a good investment on mj bags! i agree that the balenciaga is a very popular bag & that there are alot of fakes out there .. but i cannot resist on getting my hands on one this July and knowing that i own an authentic is good enough for me
.