You can change the « Triomphe » logo for a « CC », a « YSL », a double Givenchy « GG » and tbh, it could work for a Gucci collection if there’s less black and white and more brown.
Ego.Very Vogue France in the 1960s, with touches of YSL, Betty Catroux, Chanel, Marc Bohan, etc etc.
At this point, I don't think he has anything to offer a brand like Chanel. To do eight shows a year, I mean, do you really think he can do that given his very limited aesthetic universe and given that he has pretty much done everything he could at Celine already?
Also, to release the show one hour before Alessandro debuts at Valentino is such a weird strategy. Like why not on a day that none of the major brands was showing? Why today before the most important show of the season?
Yes I think so because Hedi has left a lot of « bastards » already from Dior Homme to YSL and that his aesthetic is so identifiable as his now, through endless repetition, that it is a bit like a sticky piece of gum that cannot be removed from your shoes.i dont particularly follow his work and i think that developing celine into a megabrand should be his endgame. But do you think that people will know/identify visually that its his work if the logos/tags were changed?
Virginie didn’t do interviews…Verges on the edge of 60s cosplay because it is just so incredibly serious. I guess the chandeliers falling were kind of funny. The people saying HS for Chanel — there has to be a little humor or irony at Chanel and he just doesn't have that. People will want carousel minaudières and little Chanel tchotchkes because that is what a good chunk of their clients expect. If he refuses to do shows and interviews, he just won't work for Chanel.
Lola please !!! lol 😭😭😭Tbh, I’m warming up more and more to the idea of Jacquemus at Chanel.
At least, I know something will happen there.