Where is the full campaign? Surely it should be on Chanel.com by now?
Also, I don't understand what the point of using a 'supermodel' like Claudia is, when people can't even recognize her with that wig.
Isn't the point of using supers, the fact that more people will associate with the model?
? Are people confused about the strange lady in the Prada ads because her hair is covered?
Where is the full campaign? Surely it should be on Chanel.com by now?
Also, I don't understand what the point of using a 'supermodel' like Claudia is, when people can't even recognize her with that wig.
Isn't the point of using supers, the fact that more people will associate with the model?
After all she is a model, and models should be able to tranform themselves to deliver the image needed for the job there're doing.
^^^ Because thats what people have said in this forum. That Claudia is virtually unrecognizable!![]()

. Seems a strange thing to me since I can't think of any other model who looks like Claudia S. right now and I don't find the wig to be much of a disguise (esp. since behind the scenes photos were on the web months ago). But, looking at vogue28's post, it seems as if Chanel got the supermodel exposure without having to make Claudia look like Claudia.