Maybe I am biased because of the stunning set, maybe I am biased because of the fantastic soundtrack, maybe I am biased because it is actually clothes that you want to look at and a show one wants to watch after all the appalling collections by Viard. Or the bar is so low that the tiny bit of effort feels like a pulse.
IMO it feels like Chanel without looking like Chanel at first sight (unlike Viard’s Chanel which looked so much like what Chanel should be without feeling at all like it) which was we need. Ofc he has certain tropes which are not needed and a bit too affected. And he should not be let near feathers any time soon!
But it feels fresh and it’s very désirable!! i love all the details, I love the use of colors, fantastic textures too. All the brilliant use of the house codes. For the ones saying it’s not Chanel or it is too predictable. I reckon the details very much prove otherwise.
It was also so amazingly orchestrated. THAT was A SHOW!!! Flawless production thru and thru. Even though the runway was a tad too long.. I know it’s the galaxy but still.
Great tailoring as well, you could tell the models felt really good in the clothes. Many many stunning pieces. Like the white satin gown, which m is probably my favorite look of the season (with the green tassel skirt at Alaïa)
There are some glitches for sure.. I’m not a mega fan of the footwear. Even though I like the idea of revisiting vintage models, I found them a bit meh.. Some bags worked but others didn’t. Like i understand the intention behind the deconstructed 2.55 but not sure I liked it. However, I am glad to also see him proposing new stuff and not just relying on best sellers.
The jewelry was weak though. There’s clearly some work needed in the accesories department but still that was overall a great debut! And I am sure clothes + accessories will fly off the shelves.
It completely repositions Chanel at the forefront of the fashion conversation, after the lackluster tenure by Virginie Viard. All with a sense of "ease". It doesn’t feel to me, that he tried to make a moment, yet still did! Of course it was grandiose but that’s because he has the budget and the expertise of a brand that throws the most grandiose shows. I never understood why Viard shows always felt like recession indicator..
I expected his Chanel to be reminiscent of Karl’s late nineties / to early 00s (like until 2004/05.. the more "stripped down"of his years). But there was some nods to early 90s with the headpieces, the 60s with some of the buttons. Or even the 1910s with the Chanel signature.
I did not enjoy all propositions, the headpieces for example felt frivolous & silly. Yet I enjoyed how they broke a bit the tension and seriousness! He has a very different way of being silly. It’s a serious-silly lol. There’s undeniably a sense of taking himself/things a bit too seriously in his work. I felt the same with his BV. Whereas we got use to a Chanel, that for decades, could be the climax of chic but also soooo camp, cheeky and literal.
Hopefully he taps into this a bit. Or maybe not. He doesn’t really have to. This is his house now.
And he presented a language light and playful in a very poetic way. He took the helm of a house and made it feel like a home.
I’m excited to see the rest.. and how his whole vision unfolds. With this and Tom Ford, it’s hopeful signs that we are finally entering a new era of fashion. One that feels, at least, a bit more alluring.
Oh and… Awar. Forever!