Checklist for Spring Fashion: New York Times Article

kimair

frozen
Joined
May 8, 2003
Messages
14,463
Reaction score
1
by cathy horyn...discuss...^_^

BETH BUCCINI, an owner of the SoHo boutique Kirna Zabête, was wrapping up her spring orders in Paris last week when she decided to clear her head and drop by the Lanvin shop on the Rue du Faubourg St.-Honoré. But if Ms. Buccini thought a hectic runway season was over, she was mistaken; it had, in a sense, only just begun. A customer wanted to know when she could get her hands on the wide black stretch belts that Alber Elbaz had shown with Lanvin's lustrous slim dresses.


"I thought, 'My God, the runway show was on Sunday, and it's only Wednesday,' " Ms. Buccini said.


With consumers getting their fashion news almost as quickly as buyers and journalists, and more selectively if they are only paying attention to the labels they care about, there is no way to predict what looks will still matter in March. The belt that looks hot today may be forgotten tomorrow.
Maybe that's the reason the spring collections resembled a duck-hunting contest in Central Park. The thinking among designers seemed to be that if they fired off enough buckshot - that is to say trends - in a limited space, they might actually hit something.


And don't be surprised if fashion writers are talking (more than usual) out of both sides of their mouths, extolling the merits of, say, Stefano Pilati's slim high-waisted pants for Yves Saint Laurent and, after a polite pause, suggesting that you would look adorable in Marc Jacobs's elephant trousers. If fashion seems confusing right now to journalists as well as buyers, it's because the consumer has moved the fences.


She decides what the long-running trends will be. She determines what looks will be copied. And to make things more confusing, she has different aspirations than her sisters in Asia or just down the road at the mall. That's what the spring 2006 collections made clear in its democratic sprawl of looks.


Taking a purely Darwinian view of spring, some trends appear stronger than others.


New York designers like Narciso Rodriguez and Carolina Herrera opened their collections with dresses, and the trend just kept gathering momentum - through Francisco Costa's ethereal cotton voile dresses for Calvin Klein; Miuccia Prada's naïve, hand-painted shifts; Phoebe Philo's breathy baby-doll shapes for Chloé - until at a certain point you just gave up and drew a triangle in your notebook. Voilà: a dress.


To Robert Burke, the fashion director of Bergdorf Goodman, a loose, floaty shape looks new, especially with the balance of chunky platform shoes. "Calvin Klein really set the tone for Milan and Paris with its very refined, very light fabrics," Mr. Burke said. "I thought Prada had the same message - very simple dresses, cut away from the body, in these pale colors that emphasized the lightness of the fabrics."


How many ways can you say white?


Mr. Costa's predominantly white collection, with subtle shadings of light gray and beige, turned out to be the most varied expression of the theme, with pleats and unexpected volumes conveying the same mood of air and lightness. That's something you will probably want to keep in mind next spring when you face racks of white clothes.


Is there enough detail and precision in the cut of a garment to save it from looking like a glorified sack? Mr. Rodriguez engineered his Empire linen dresses to get the most from their minimalist cut, but no more than was necessary.


Mr. Costa often added a layer of voile for weight. Ms. Prada gave her chalky dresses a sepia tint, and for perversity's sake she had one look tied loosely up the back, hospital style. (O.K., it's just a thought.)


Ms. Buccini noted that a number of Paris designers, including Mr. Elbaz and Olivier Theyskens at Rochas, perked up their whites with couture finishes.


At Lanvin, a low-back shift came in washed ivory Duchess satin, a classic white blouse in laundered charmeuse. Mr. Theyskens said the crinkled stretch cotton of a long white skirt and matching jacket brought to mind rustic cloth from his ancestral Normandy. A model in showroom said the skirt was as comfortable as her bluejeans.
 
part 2

At the opposite extreme is the dark, elegant pantsuit. Ms. Buccini recalled that Bryan Bradley closed his Tuleh show in New York with a pair of masculine pantsuits. They served as a double apostrophe for his collection, and what was to come at the European shows. Stores next spring will emphasize a variety of pants styles and jackets - "I've never bought so many jackets," Ms. Buccini said.

If you don't count Bermudas, there are three styles of pants that will be relevant: the slouchy trousers that Mr. Theyskens showed (and which are held in place just below the waist by an interior band of grosgrain ribbon); the wide, cropped style at Michael Kors; and the tailored Saint Laurent toreador pants that look best belted.

The Saint Laurent pants incorporate another spring trend: the trim waist. The tulip-shaped skirts at Fendi, with their cummerbund waists, bear mentioning. It's a flattering look, especially with a plain white blouse. (Bergdorf will now be carrying Fendi ready-to-wear.)

The difference in jackets next season is the line of the shoulders. Mr. Theyskens removed almost all the padding from his jackets to help give a lean, natural-looking slouch. But most designers did something a little bit funny.

Frida Giannini pinched the shoulders of her Gucci black satin jackets. There is a slight peak to the paisley and Regency striped jackets at Balenciaga, too, with some of Nicolas Ghesquiere's styles getting an extra Baroque buildup.

Rei Kawakubo took the look to extremes, evoking monarchy with her sternly piled tartan shoulders. Junya Watanabe's pinched-back trench coats brought the message down the earth: sharp tailoring is one of spring's high signs.

In the absence of any clear statement about sexy dressing, except from the Alaïa and Versace archive messengers, it is tempting to include a category called Just Pretty. But that seems Just Drippy.

There is, however, a nice undercurrent of sexual thought and tension working through a number of collections, notably Lanvin, with those black stretch belts serving as censor bars across bare backs, and at John Galliano, with its smudgy furnace-layers of floral chiffon.

And in keeping with the breezy, independent-minded attitude of spring, Doo-Ri Chung's draped silk jersey dresses deserve to be noticed, especially by Hollywood stylists trying to shovel their clients into taffeta. What could be more new and provocative than a dress that barely touches your body?

slideshow of her pics here.
 
thanks for posting this kimair...:flower:

it does seem to be the season of the dress...
which is just fine with me...
i love dresses...
they are so grown up and feminine without necessarily being fussy...
 
For the first time in my life, I'm so into dresses. The designers offered a lot for the spring season and I'm going to buy lots of them:smile:
The waist is another great trend. I personally like that kind of style on me :-)
Thanks for the article Kimair!
 
dresses seem huge for ss06..

a good reason to bump this older thread into action
 
Yes, same here. This is the first time I've really started to love dresses :smile:

I ordered three from Urban Outfitters recently :smile:
 
us Bazaar, vogue uk, vogue china, us elle,vogue germany, most covers of vogue paris.. all have dresses as covers for january 06..
quite a hit..
 
I personally love a woman in a dress, it's so distinctively feminine. And there were so many gorgeous options on the spring runways, and I love how she mentioned all of the more loosely cute ones that graze the body rather than hug it....there's something very sensual about that.
 
With the huge number of options out there...I'm sure there's gonna be a dress for everyone out there
 
Spike413 said:
I personally love a woman in a dress, it's so distinctively feminine. And there were so many gorgeous options on the spring runways, and I love how she mentioned all of the more loosely cute ones that graze the body rather than hug it....there's something very sensual about that.

I completely agree. A dress is modern femininity brought back to it's basic element. And from that, all designers have created so many good options that any woman will indeed be able to find a dress herself. Or a belt for that matter ^_^
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,764
Messages
15,127,141
Members
84,491
Latest member
ross640
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->