disco54
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2006
- Messages
- 4,774
- Reaction score
- 1,338
from the beginning of her tenure, i've resisted any suggestion that hannah macgibbons found herself in any way inferior to her predecessor, paulo melim andersson, because she never ever, unlike andersson, committed that original sin of forgetting about the heritage of the house: with this collection, she committed that very sin. this collection, as so many have mentioned, is a calvin klein collection. it's a good calvin klein collection, but it's not a chloe collection. not by any stripe of the imagination. and this comes at a particularly pressing time as we have entered, seriously, THE PERFECT CHLOE SEASON. marc jacobs is doing that seventies thing. fendi is doing that seventies thing. gucci is doing that seventies thing. why wouldn't the quintessential seventies' girl house not do seventies?!?
this is more than an off collection, this is a missed opportunity. sure, she got boring with her work at chloe, which, in a recession, is forgiveable, but designing for a completely different house? fashion blasphemy.
** do not quote images, please**
style.it
I know , what a moron seriously in a time when the Chloe era style clothing is in fashion she does something so bizarre , not only alienating the customer base or whats left of it , but changing the ethos of the house lol. If she makes another off the wall collection , I wont be surprised if they can her ***.
Last edited by a moderator: