Christian Dior Pre-Fall 2026 Paris | Page 2 | the Fashion Spot

Christian Dior Pre-Fall 2026 Paris

Forums New posts
One sight first grabs all the attention in Jonathan Anderson’s second women’s collection for Dior: these jeans! Standing there on the side of the Seine, their fit and flow, and their ginormous skirt-like proportions are pushed-over-the-limits in a way that makes you stare and sends fashion taste-buds into instant uproar.

Anderson was quite casual about it. “So here, we have developed a super-lightweight denim,” he started. “But it’s really weird.” The shape began, he said, with the outline of regular jeans, and then putting “couture volume on the side.” It’s the silhouette-exploding, genre-melding technique he’s applied to enlarging men’s cargo shorts with the winged side-cut of Delft, a 1949 Christian Dior haute couture dress, but now with a very different looking outcome. Street yet haute. Ordinaire made extraordinaire.

“It’s the idea of the reality of the girl of Dior. How do we remove the stifling-ness of Dior?” he remarked rhetorically. “It is a French brand. It’s about beginning to re-start the language. Taking time to discover who the Dior woman is.” Or, maybe more accurately, it’s about finding ways to attract Dior women, plural. Pluralist dressing is a growing thing, I would hate to say a trend, because it’s the reverse of the narrow coerciveness that word implies. But take a look at what Matthieu Blazy is doing at Chanel and Sarah Burton has brought to Givenchy: ideas that accommodate a lot of women in lots of different ways. Anderson’s pre-collection does this par excellence. “It’s huge. I want the collections to talk to one another. They don't have to be the same, but when you go to mix it, you enrich the wardrobe you’re shopping for.”

The mission is of course to navigate plurality while maintaining a total focus on brand identity. The assertion of the primacy of the Dior Bar jacket while softening its construction is all over the collection. It can look utterly avant-garde with loopy ribbon whip-stitched around the edges or come over as an everyday cool French-girl uniform as a black blazer worn over an untucked shirt and regular patched-knee jeans.

The collection runs up the scale to utterly luscious yet slightly deconstructed evening dress, through calibrations of cocktail dressing—fluid asymmetry or re-carved tuxedos—and down through tailored coats and trenches. Pausing over a plushly-lined fawn raincoat, Anderson remarked, “it’s a technical nylon with a removable dark shearling collar and liner. I want to make sure that we have these pieces that can work on younger and older, you know, but at the same time, give edge to both.”

The collection is a barometer of the tone of what Anderson is setting out to do at Dior, how he’s engaging with the maison’s past and present, and how much of his own personality and formidable experience he’s stamping on it. There’s a joyful, off-hand accomplishment in the delightfully-Dior Lyons moire silk strapless dresses, tied up in the flourish of a knot on one hip, and with a puff of tulle petticoat escaping at the side (the cerulean one was worn by Sunday Rose Kidman Urban when she presented Anderson with the Designer of the Year trophy at the London Fashion Awards a couple of weeks ago). There’s all the jewelry, which Anderson proved himself to have such a flair for at Loewe, now blossoming into oversized metal hydrangea earrings, dangling mixed-media earrings composed of crystal chunks, studded cabochon pearls and metallic bows, and playful ‘mechanical’ rings that spring open to reveal “things like ladybirds.”

Anderson sees himself in the long line of designers who have occupied the house since Monsieur Dior, cherry-picking and building on what they did. He pointed out that, in slip dresses and sequined slithers “we’re bringing bias cut back into the house. It hasn’t been here since John Galliano.” Back to the jeans, now: It was his predecessor Maria Grazia Chiuri who established denim in the house. Anderson has never been seen wearing anything but jeans himself, of course. Denim’s a staple he knows inside out, having designed it for his own brand, Loewe, and Uniqlo for years. But now, reveling in the technical fabrication resources at Dior, he’s taking it other places.

One of them is to the highest of the haute: a richly embroidered 18th-century style dark denim tailcoat, waistcoat, and bootcut jeans. Already shown in his menswear pre-collection, it’s part of the ethos of “the shared wardrobe” Anderson is bringing to Dior. Not just because he’s the first to be designing both collections, but because he brought that fluidity to fashion from the get-go of his career as a twenty-something in London.

And the other approach is the fluid jeans: exquisitely-woven dirty-look denim poured into the context of Dior flou. By placing it on the street and creating a style moment he’s guaranteed to set the internet blazing without even having a show. That too is very Jonathan Anderson. Alongside his genius for making merchandise useful there’s also his maverick belief in putting out fashion with a capital F.

Like it? Hate it? Everyone will be hot-taking, and that’s part of the game too. Keep looking, though. After enough repetitions of the idea, it’s astonishing how normalized the silhouette becomes. The only frustration is that you want to see these things move. Is that because Anderson’s saving up the reveal of something along those liquid lines for his first couture show in January? With the sheer level of craft already exerted in this ready-to-wear collection it’s pretty spectacular to imagine what he could put on next.
Click to expand...
VOGUE
 
I don’t find it uncohesive or lacking in consistency I just find it unbalanced…
Ironically he says that he wants to remove the stiffness out of Dior but he is over designing things.
Do shoes needed that gold thing stuck on them?
Does that black skirt with the drape needed an attached tulle train?

The yellow dress is cute but could have been better with a less aggressive yellow. It would look amazing on my skin tone though.

The last dress is a case study in adding stiffness to lightness.

Maybe JWA should actually apply lightness and remove things, not necessarily try to be edgy.

I have always said it. He is a great commercial designer who wants to appear so much edgy. He shines when he just do commercial stuff.

He is not rooted enough technically to aspire to be one of the designers he admires. A 5 pockets jeans no matter how light the fabric is, when cut like a regular 501, is still at the end a regular pair of jeans!

It doesn’t have to be explained in a long text to be appreciated.
 
thiago:) said:
For some reason, I thought his Dior would be as glorious as his Loewe FW2016…
Click to expand...
Probably his best collection, but let's be honest, that was a Celine by Phoebe show in disguise!
But I would totally get onboard on a new take on Dior starting from Raf and Phoebe and adding a bit of glamour, edge and sparkle.
 
I'm sorry but I'm finding the accessories to be extremely ugly, overdesigned, trying so hard to be "cool" and "edgy":
- Those 100% low quality zamak / brass alloy aged gold Dior badges put on bags and shoes. I wonder if they are gonna tarnish after 2 wears like Versace costume jewelry...
- The "D i o r" hardware in those suede messengers screams "look at me I am wearing Dior" status symbol
- Those weirdly shaped loafers for both menswear and womenswear

So far I'm only saving the revamped Book Totes (even though they are kinda gimmicky in my opinion).
I wish he didn't show the Oblique motif on the runway / lookbook, he can leave that to the merchandise team.
 
I think Dior was the wrong house for our friend JWA. At least, doing this much volume. I feel like his strength at Loewe was curation and concept. Every season had such a clear exploration of idea, silhouette, texture, but between RTW, couture, mens and more...this schedule may break him. There is simply no time to find inspiration and execute it to perfection, especially with the number of looks he must produce every year. There are some immaculate pieces here, don't get me wrong, but there is a lot of mess and mediocrity as well. You can tell this is a man who is completely burnt out.
 
Overall, I find everything atrocious. There's no sophistication, no elegance, but not even the craftsmanship of the ateliers... everything seems cheap and poorly constructed. I never thought I'd miss Mariagrazia, as boring as she was, her dresses were always immaculate.
I don't even see a comparison with Blazy, as this stuff is not a step, but a whole ladder below Chanel... Instead, I see the same problem I find with AM's Valentino: I always have that feeling of incompleteness, of wanting to make this perfect dress but either the fabric is wrong or the fit is wrong or it's poorly cut... I don't know what it is, but I recognize this flaw.
Oh, and the lookbook reminds me terribly of a Givenchy couture look, maybe 2011, maybe not the same bridge, but the photos are definitely very similar.
 
He really designs for young rich girls... I agree with Lola, the spirit is quite fun but it doesn't translate. The products are there, just need to be styled better. Maybe time for a new stylist? And get a new shoes designer too while you are at it. Christen is not working her magic at Dior (the house is too sweet for her personal taste).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar Threads

Frederic01
Christian Dior Pre-Fall 2022 Paris
2 3
Replies
47
Views
10K
Cocteau Stone
Cocteau Stone
Squizree
Issey Miyake S/S 2026 Paris
Replies
10
Views
870
Monsieur Cristobal
Monsieur Cristobal
Squizree
Nina Ricci S/S 2026 Paris
2
Replies
24
Views
2K
RosesAreRed
R
Mahi
Belstaff Pre-Fall 2016
Replies
1
Views
2K
Mahi
Mahi
Scotty
Versace Pre-Fall 2018
Replies
4
Views
3K
Bertrando3
Bertrando3

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 8 (members: 1, guests: 7)

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,529
Messages
15,306,311
Members
89,544
Latest member
NanKempnersVendeuse

Share This Page

Back
Top