Cosmopolitan - Worldwide

Discussion in 'Magazines' started by violet100, Nov 6, 2004.

  1. violet100

    violet100 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2002
    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    1
    Moderator's Note November 2008

    All Cosmopolitan threads have been merged together.
    This Worldwide thread will now be for posting & commenting on all issues of Cosmopolitan.

    Thank You :flower:
     
    #1 violet100, Nov 6, 2004
    Last edited by moderator Sarahh: Nov 16, 2008
  2. violet100

    violet100 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2002
    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    1
    US Cosmopolitan March 2005 : Jessica Alba

    [​IMG][​IMG]
    Horrible colours...stiff pose...

    ebay
     
    #2 violet100, Feb 8, 2005
    Last edited by moderator hellothere: Jul 24, 2008
  3. Misako

    Misako within an embrace

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,561
    Likes Received:
    0
    Eeek. Bad.

    I only saw "March 05 Cosmopolitan Jessica" when I first saw the title and thought, "oh god no, not another Jessica Simpson cover". lol.
     
  4. NOE

    NOE New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    0
    Looks like her head is darn near disconnected from her body:huh:
    She's usually sooo pretty and that cover/dress does not a thing for her:(
     
  5. morgan38

    morgan38 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    4,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    haha i thought that too :lol:
     
  6. alouisa

    alouisa Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2004
    Messages:
    433
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cosmo has done that before. one head, dif. body.

    Ughh...shes sooo pretty, but this cover photo looks BAD.
     
  7. angelanna

    angelanna edge of love

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    3,055
    Likes Received:
    0
    not too keen on the cover

    it does look like they've just put her head on a different outfit/pose that she tried on.
     
  8. jadedomega

    jadedomega Muse

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's ok but kind of arkward.
     
  9. liberty33r1b

    liberty33r1b Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2003
    Messages:
    23,888
    Likes Received:
    216
    ugly cover....
     
  10. NouvelleVague

    NouvelleVague New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    0
    :yuk: the picture has been retouched too much, but that's what you expect from cosmo.
    The blue and orange irritate me too much.
     
  11. SCBl0ndie

    SCBl0ndie Guest

    Oh my God! That looks so incredibly different from every other Cosmo cover!:rolleyes:
     
  12. SCBl0ndie

    SCBl0ndie Guest

    Love unique-ness.
     

    Attached Files:

  13. Kimkhuu

    Kimkhuu New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,525
    Likes Received:
    3
    ^ :lol: Talk about creativity.
     
  14. Kimkhuu

    Kimkhuu New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,525
    Likes Received:
    3
    Notice they all do the one-leg-forward-and-pull-the-dress-up pose. Dreadful. Whoever came up with that idea and ask the girls to do it for every single cover is totally lame.
     
  15. InStyleinNY

    InStyleinNY New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    0
    is it just me or does her right eye look droopier than the left?!? weird!:shock:
     
  16. purplelucrezia

    purplelucrezia New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,807
    Likes Received:
    2
    It's almost scary in a way... At my cousin's house, they have this most ancient collection of Cosmo magazines, and every single one of them looks identical. Except for the celebrities who have their faces pasted on, I honestly cannot tell the difference between a Cosmopolitan from 1992 and 2002. And is her forehead creeping anyone else out?

    :shock:
     
  17. HBoogie

    HBoogie Procrastinator.

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2003
    Messages:
    3,678
    Likes Received:
    0
    You know, I don't really understand why Cosmo insists on the "sexy" cleavage-and-leg shot for its covers. I have never once seen a man buying it (you know, for, ahem, "reading material"). I guess it's their whole for-men attitude. You know, "101 Ways to Entice Him!", "Six So-Sexy Summer Trends", "Bedroom Eyes: Your Foolproof Makeup Plan", "How to Sleep Your Way to the Top (But Pretend Like You Got There on Merit Alone)."
     
  18. Reseneace

    Reseneace New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Messages:
    417
    Likes Received:
    0
    Kimkhuu i noticed that too.Its really strange to have them do the same thing everytime.
     
  19. NOE

    NOE New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good Eye! I didn't even notice that. :P Now it's all I'm gonna think of when I see Cosmo. I never even get that mag anymore. There's only so many ways to 'Be Sexy' and 'Please Your Man'. It's a bit degrading after a while. It's like the sterotypical single and desperate manual or something:rolleyes:
     
  20. HotSpot

    HotSpot New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think she sooo gorgeous normally, but I hate this cover! She doesn't look right :blink:
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"