Cosmopolitan - Worldwide

[violet100]

Moderator's Note November 2008

All Cosmopolitan threads have been merged together.
This Worldwide thread will now be for posting & commenting on all issues of Cosmopolitan.

Thank You

 

[violet100]

US Cosmopolitan March 2005 : Jessica Alba

Horrible colours...stiff pose...

ebay

 

[Misako]

Eeek. Bad.

I only saw "March 05 Cosmopolitan Jessica" when I first saw the title and thought, "oh god no, not another Jessica Simpson cover". lol.

 

[NOE]

Looks like her head is darn near disconnected from her body
She's usually sooo pretty and that cover/dress does not a thing for her

 

[morgan38]

Eeek. Bad.

I only saw "March 05 Cosmopolitan Jessica" when I first saw the title and thought, "oh god no, not another Jessica Simpson cover". lol.

haha i thought that too

 

[alouisa]

Looks like her head is darn near disconnected from her body
She's usually sooo pretty and that cover/dress does not a thing for her

Cosmo has done that before. one head, dif. body.

Ughh...shes sooo pretty, but this cover photo looks BAD.

 

[angelanna]

not too keen on the cover

it does look like they've just put her head on a different outfit/pose that she tried on.

 

[jadedomega]

It's ok but kind of arkward.

 

[liberty33r1b]

ugly cover....

 

[NouvelleVague]

the picture has been retouched too much, but that's what you expect from cosmo.
The blue and orange irritate me too much.

 

[SCBl0ndie]

Oh my God! That looks so incredibly different from every other Cosmo cover!

 

[SCBl0ndie]

Love unique-ness.

 

[Kimkhuu]

^ Talk about creativity.

 

[Kimkhuu]

Notice they all do the one-leg-forward-and-pull-the-dress-up pose. Dreadful. Whoever came up with that idea and ask the girls to do it for every single cover is totally lame.

 

[InStyleinNY]

Horrible colours...stiff pose...

is it just me or does her right eye look droopier than the left?!? weird!

 

[purplelucrezia]

Notice they all do the one-leg-forward-and-pull-the-dress-up pose. Dreadful. Whoever came up with that idea and ask the girls to do it for every single cover is totally lame.

It's almost scary in a way... At my cousin's house, they have this most ancient collection of Cosmo magazines, and every single one of them looks identical. Except for the celebrities who have their faces pasted on, I honestly cannot tell the difference between a Cosmopolitan from 1992 and 2002. And is her forehead creeping anyone else out?

 

[HBoogie]

You know, I don't really understand why Cosmo insists on the "sexy" cleavage-and-leg shot for its covers. I have never once seen a man buying it (you know, for, ahem, "reading material"). I guess it's their whole for-men attitude. You know, "101 Ways to Entice Him!", "Six So-Sexy Summer Trends", "Bedroom Eyes: Your Foolproof Makeup Plan", "How to Sleep Your Way to the Top (But Pretend Like You Got There on Merit Alone)."

 

[Reseneace]

Kimkhuu i noticed that too.Its really strange to have them do the same thing everytime.

 

[NOE]

Notice they all do the one-leg-forward-and-pull-the-dress-up pose. Dreadful. Whoever came up with that idea and ask the girls to do it for every single cover is totally lame.

Good Eye! I didn't even notice that. Now it's all I'm gonna think of when I see Cosmo. I never even get that mag anymore. There's only so many ways to 'Be Sexy' and 'Please Your Man'. It's a bit degrading after a while. It's like the sterotypical single and desperate manual or something

 

[HotSpot]

I think she sooo gorgeous normally, but I hate this cover! She doesn't look right