
kuba01 said:okay - I have the Sunday Magazine at my school but the scanner is broken and so I can't scan it. I did however realise that the interview or editorial about her is new!
She talks about liking her moms cooking and what music she listens to (Jeff Buckley) and general info. I'll try to type the interview or whatever up and post it soon.

eword said:you're optimistic, guys, about september covers... me, i wonder if linda got the cover as a model or as a celebrity.
anyway, if they decide to give a young model a cover, i think daria is the candidate n.1. IF!
***
sweet rus, that animation is great! very feline!![]()

yuris said:wow she's been to 109???![]()
that`s a surprise...
eword said:i wonder if linda got the cover as a model or as a celebrity![]()
Linda has said that she was born to be a model, she's simply a veteran Supermodel in the cover of Vogue.Moofins said:Realistically, you're right that it's rare that we'll see her on the cover any time soon, but still. Dunst promoting her movie during one of the largets Ad bursts during the year is sort of silly to me.
. Last year was Sarah Jessica Parker, who, although I think she's ugly, is a big style icon. Then 2004 was the great Daria/Natalia/Gisele cover, 2003 was Nicole Kidman....they all make sense. Putting Kirsten on would make no sense whatsoever.ditto. Kirsten Dunst.. ugh, YUCK!Callidora said:Oh god, not Kirsten Dunst. Anyone but her. Yuk.
I hope it's not true.Callidora said:Agreed. September is the biggest fashion month of the year, and generally magazines use someone classy or do something especially eye-catching. The idea of putting Kirsten Dunst on a September Vogue cover is just. Last year was Sarah Jessica Parker, who, although I think she's ugly, is a big style icon. Then 2004 was the great Daria/Natalia/Gisele cover, 2003 was Nicole Kidman....they all make sense. Putting Kirsten on would make no sense whatsoever.


i'm rather perplexe.