Edward Steichen - Photographer

SomethingElse

Press escape to continue.
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Messages
5,444
Reaction score
0
Edward Steichen was already a famous painter and photographer on both sides of the Atlantic (possibly the most famous photographer), when, in early 1923, he was offered possibly one of the most prestigious and certainly the most lucrative position in photography’s commercial domain – that of chief photographer for Condé Nast’s influential and highly-regarded magazines, Vogue and Vanity Fair. Though it meant a break with the high-minded art-for-art’s-sake ethos espoused by his mentor Alfred Stieglitz (a break viewed as treachery by Stieglitz and his friends), he leapt at the chance, having come to the conclusion that photography’s natural -- and therefore true -- function was utilitarian: a thoroughly modern means of human communication. For the next fifteen years, Steichen would take full advantage of the resources and prestige conferred by the Condé Nast empire to produce an oeuvre of unequalled brilliance, putting his exceptional talents and prodigious energies to work dramatizing and glamorizing contemporary culture and its achievers -- in politics, literature, journalism, dance, theatre, opera, and above all, the world of high fashion.

No other fashion photographer could rival Steichen for the range he covered: Chanel, Lanvin, Lelong, Alix, Gres, Piguet, Pacquin, Schiaparelli, and a host of other couturiers and couturieres saw their creations depicted creatively and convincingly by Steichen on the pages of Vogue. No other portrait photographer could rival Steichen for the number of bold, engaging studies he made of artists and statesmen for Vanity Fair. Who else could boast of having photographed so many of the world’s best filmmakers, actors, actresses, painters, athletes, playwrights, producers, poets, journalists, dancers, singers, writers?

The fashion plates Steichen produced make for a full archive of modernist fashion of the inter-war years. In the 1920s and 30s, Steichen created a new style of fashion photography, which had previously been a fussy, fuzzy pictorialist affair, out of step with the modernist ethos championed by the couturiers themselves, busily absorbing avant-garde currents of the time. Steichen’s first-hand exposure to progressive art on both sides of the Atlantic, and his own naturally eclectic bent, made him the ideal translator of couture into photography. His crisp, detailed, high-key style revolutionized fashion photography, and is a strong wind felt in the field to this day -- George Hoyningen-Huene, Horst P. Horst, Richard Avedon, Robert Mapplethorpe and Bruce Weber are only his most illustrious descendants.

The full list of Steichen’s portraits is astounding for its range. Among the more than one thousand subjects were the filmmakers Cecil B. De Mille, Ernst Lubitsch, Irving Thalberg, Josef von Sternberg and Walt Disney; among the actors, Gary Cooper, Maurice Chevalier, Harold Lloyd, W.C. Fields and Rudolph Valentino; among the actresses, Shirley Temple, Gloria Swanson, Claudette Colbert, Marlene Dietrich and Fay Wray; among the painters, Henri Matisse and Georges Rouault; among the writers, Thomas Mann, George Bernard Shaw, W.B. Yeats, e.e. cummings, Luigi Pirandello and Collette; among the dancers, Martha Graham, Ruth St. Denis and Fred Astaire; among the musicians, Igor Stravinsky, Leopold Schakowsky, Vladimir Horowitz and George Gershwin; among the statesmen Winston Churchill, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Herbert Hoover; among the athletes, Jack Dempsey and Suzanne Lenglen; among the journalists Clare Luce, Walter Winchell and Walter Lippmann. Often the portraits of women artists and actresses double as fashion statements; Collette in Chanel; Hepburn in Schiaparelli, Swanson in Chanel.

The Steichen archive at Condé Nast contains more than two thousand original vintage prints. A few of the images are well-known and indeed feature as iconic images in various histories of photography. Never before, however, have more than a handful of these prints been exhibited or published. The 1920s and 1930s represent the high point in Edward Steichen’s photographic career, and the work he did for Condé Nast’s influential magazines will stand forever among the most striking creations of twentieth-century photography.

condenast02.jpg
condenast07.jpg

condenast10.jpg
condenast16.jpg

condenast17.jpg
condenast01.jpg


fep-paris.org
 
:heart: :heart: may I just add hopw happy I am to see so many interwar period photogrphers having their threads at tfs now.
There is such a graphic nearly geometrical quality to steinchens pictures! :heart:
 
Photography records the gamut of feelings written on the human face - the beauty of the earth and skies that man has inherited; and the wealth and confusion that man has created. It is a major force in explaining man to man.

- Edward Steichen

He has created truely inspiring imagery, whos work I always find myself returning to. Thank you for this! :heart: ...

I have a range of his images spanning from 1900-34, i will share, but just a question would you prefer to keep the images from the period in the thread title and only fashion work? ...
 
^ everything. "behind the lens' includes all! no? if you have any images of his work in India... :heart:
 
I'm back ... SomethingElse Unfortunately I don't have any of his work from India, Unfortunately I don't own a scanner, but i'll try to see if I can find some online :doh: :heart: ...

Here we go ...

Self Portrait, 1900
SelfPortrait1900.png


Dawn-Flowers, 1903
Dawn-Flowers1903.png


Pool, 1903
Pool1903.png


Self Portrait, c.1905
SelfPortraitc.png

Howard Greenberg Gallery
 
Flatiron Building, 1905
FlatironBuilding1905.png


In Memoriam, 1906
InMemoriam1906.png


Mother And Child - Sunlight, 1906
MotherAndChild-Sunlight1906.png


Rodin - Le Penseur, 1906
Rodin-LePenseur1906.png

Same source
 
:heart: :flower: :heart: I love the painterliness of the images you've posted so far, Multitudes. There is such dreaminess and peace in his portrait work, and his renaissance women take my breath away. Thanks a million for posting these! Sepia and black and white prints... heaven!
 
^You're very welcome! :flower: ... yes the painterliness and the texture there is in the photographs is really beautiful. I also sometimes wonder about the technical aspect of the cameras back then, not that I have any knowledge about it, if that have something to do with it! I would imagine that the cameras back then wasn't that light secured, which might have something to do with the dark, dreamy atmospheric feeling there is in the photographs. The "Mother And Child - Sunlight, 1906" has a quite surreal and dreamy state over it and I think that this overexposure from the suns light maybe has something to do with it! but i don't know? :heart: ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
More of his work ...

The Little Round Mirror, 1906
TheLittleRoundMirror1906.png


William M. Chase, 1906
WilliamM.png


Balzac - The Open Sky, 1911
Balzac-TheOpenSky1911.png


Balzac - Towards The Light, Midnight, 1911
Balzac-TowardsTheLightMidnight1911.png

Howard Greenberg Gallery
 
Steeplechase Day, Paris Grand Stand, 1913
SteeplechaseDayParisGrandStand1913.png


Lotus, Mt. Kisco, New York, 1915
LotusMt.png


Self Portrait With Studio Camera, 1917
SelfPortraitWithStudioCamera1917.png


Wheelbarrow With Flower Pots, France, 1920
WheelbarrowWithFlowerPotsFrance1920.png

Same source
 
:flower: Rodin's Balzac through Steichen's lens is supreme. Interesting how he names each of the Balzac images to describe the lighting. These are all amazingly beautiful. I have a friend who has done black and white for at least 50 years. I'll see what secrets he can divulge.... :ninja:

Oh goodie! I found some online too!

steichen_matisse.jpg


Henri Matisse and "The Serpentine", c. 1909

steichen_gloria_swanson.jpg


Gloria Swanson, c. 1924

masters-of-photography.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another Balzac!

steichen_rodins_balzac.jpg


Midnight - Rodin's Balzac, c. 1908

steichen_egg.jpg


Triumph of the Egg, c. 1921

And last, but not least, the fabulous Greta Garbo.

steichen_garbo.jpg


There are a few still lifes and other interesting photographs on the source site.

masters-of-photography.com
 
Yes Please do ask, It would be very interesting to hear from a person who has been working with b/w over such a period of time, also to hear what the technical developments impact on images has had. Not that I think that it's only a technical aspect that has formed the atmospher in his very early photographs, but I do think it has something to say but please ask! And that Gloria Swanson is breathtaking, These strong penetrating eyes veiled by a delicate ornamentation :heart: ...
 
MULTITUDES, there you are, we've missed you!


Heavy Roses 1914


Portrait of Miss Sawyer c.1914


Woods Interior 1898


all from mastersofphotography

My favorite photographer...:heart:...so...heartbreakingly beautiful...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes it can be hard to find me! :ninja:... I've been back for a while now, but maybe been hiding a bit in all these fantastic photography threads and feeding them. I have missed you too, you're not so easy to find yourself you know! ... And it's wonderful to see you in here! :P :heart: ...
 
A few more of Garbo by Steichen, all from 1928.


(garboforever-forum.de.vu; greta-garbo.de; eastman.org)
 

Attachments

  • Garbo by Steichen 1928.jpg
    Garbo by Steichen 1928.jpg
    9.2 KB · Views: 130
  • Garbo by Steichen 1928b.jpg
    Garbo by Steichen 1928b.jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 3
  • Garbo (greta-garbo.de)2.jpg
    Garbo (greta-garbo.de)2.jpg
    17.1 KB · Views: 4
  • Garbo by Steichen 1928 (eastman.org).jpg
    Garbo by Steichen 1928 (eastman.org).jpg
    116 KB · Views: 7

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
211,178
Messages
15,143,271
Members
84,897
Latest member
clubmissy
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->