Elle Germany September 2010 : Angelina Jolie

[tigerrouge]

No doubt a recycled image that's been used ten times before, but here it is. I like the playfulness of it, normally her shots have her coming on strong. Seems to be a bit more writing on the cover than usual, but not in any gaudy way (pressekatalog.de)

 

[jal718]

Something is wrong with that hat

 

[tigerrouge]

Angelina's wearing it, so no doubt it's a hat full of evil intentions and celebrity witchcraft.

 

[jeremydante]

#teamaniston

 

[Deleted member 1957]

thats a weird shot...kinda shortens her head. I wonder why most editors dont know what to do with her

 

[jacquelineo]

#teamaniston

Is that really necessary?


I love the photo of Angelina, but the cover looks messy with all that text on it.

 

[tentalicious]

ph: Patrick Demarchelier
The shot is new according to Parade Magazine and only used by them a few weeks ago for their cover (July, 11 2010) but I kinda like it! thanks for posting tigerrouge !

[parade@facebook]

 

[indepwe]

I like the shot but I'd like to see it without the hat

 

[Deleted member 1957]

the German version is a photoshop fail, they stretched her face

 

[MON]

The hat makes her head a bit squeezed. Don`t like this at all. German Elle needs a new layout

 

[agee]

I like the cover a lot.

This intrigues me, this is the second time that Elle Germany used a previously published cover photo, which in and of itself is not unheard of but the previous publisher was a different company, e.g., it is not uncommon for Vogue, Allure and W to share content because they have the same parent company (Conde Nast), but I didn't realize that Elle could buy / license something that another company published, especially when the debut of the original was not that long ago. I guess it's allowed, it's just not a common practice.

ETA:
Really when I think about it, I am aware that there are reps / clearinghouses for photographic work, so again the issue seems to be that it is not a common practice for recent work to be published in major magazines with different parent companies.

 

[justaguy]

She has a lovely face. Why they felt the need to widen it is beyond me!

 

[Breathless]

Something is wrong with that hat

Something is wrong with a lot of things in that picture.

 

[robotcow]

its not too bad

 

[Rigida]

i like the pink font.. but don't really like the cover..

 

[hysteria]

I find it to be nice cover, but everything ruins too much text on it.

 

[jexxica]

I love that pic. Even if its photoshopped, she looks so much younger.

 

[TREVOFASHIONISTO]

I quite like it she
looks younger and seductive

 

[tentalicious]

HQ COVER

[courtesy of elle.de]