yeah but you also must realize that not all designers are like Prada etc. and not all mags are like Vogue in that alot of the designers that are featured in stories don't do advertising campaigns. And many aren't quite as tremendous or even close to being recognized for that matter.Originally posted by softgrey@Feb 3rd, 2004 - 11:47 am
yeah- sorry-scott-magazines don't pay for a thing- the clothing is leant to them by the designers in hopes that it will be photographed-basically free advertising for them-an ad could cost $30,000. The magazines do have relationships with the designers who advertise with them and they tend to feature their clothing more than someone who is new. That's why Prada's on the cover of Vogue so often, etc.
An advertising shoot is where the clothes are hired or rented. Ie-music video, album cover, advertisement for things other than clothing-ie-computer ad, car ad, shoe company who doesn't make clothing, etc. Basically, anywhere that the designers name is not mentioned.
That's how it works...
i think the point scott was trying to make, softgrey, is that if we're talking about fashion magazines that are more independent, it can be much more difficult for the stylist to get their hands on pieces they want. vintage and indie designers are often used and can come at a cost. obviously if you're looking at mainstream fashion magazines of course they're going to use the big mainstream labels repeatedly and they have established relationships. the magazine chooses which pieces they want to shoot and borrows it from the designer.Originally posted by softgrey@Feb 3rd, 2004 - 1:29 pm
I'm not going to argue about it- I know how it works because I am a stylist and have been for over 10 yrs. I was just trying to help Faust understand a little bit about how it works in this business. I'm not guessing or making it up, Scott-this is how it works. The designer even has to sometimes pay to have a dress shipped to NY from Paris hoping someone will shoot it and then it doesn't even get shot. It's very difficult for the designer, but it's part of a marketing budget that has to be factored into the business plan of the company. Fashion design is mostly so difficult because it just costs so much. This is part of the cost of doing business.
Faust-if you have any other questions, I would be happy to answer them.
i think the point scott was trying to make, softgrey, is that if we're talking about fashion magazines that are more independent, it can be much more difficult for the stylist to get their hands on pieces they want. vintage and indie designers are often used and can come at a cost. obviously if you're looking at mainstream fashion magazines of course they're going to use the big mainstream labels repeatedly and they have established relationships. the magazine chooses which pieces they want to shoot and borrows it from the designer. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by smashinfashion+Feb 3rd, 2004 - 1:47 pm--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(smashinfashion @ Feb 3rd, 2004 - 1:47 pm)</div><div class='quotemain'> <!--QuoteBegin-softgrey@Feb 3rd, 2004 - 1:29 pm
I'm not going to argue about it- I know how it works because I am a stylist and have been for over 10 yrs. I was just trying to help Faust understand a little bit about how it works in this business. I'm not guessing or making it up, Scott-this is how it works. The designer even has to sometimes pay to have a dress shipped to NY from Paris hoping someone will shoot it and then it doesn't even get shot. It's very difficult for the designer, but it's part of a marketing budget that has to be factored into the business plan of the company. Fashion design is mostly so difficult because it just costs so much. This is part of the cost of doing business.
Faust-if you have any other questions, I would be happy to answer them.
I always thought so.. it's like free advertising (as mentioned earlier).Originally posted by Spacemiu@Feb 3rd, 2004 - 8:19 pm
iI think whether its Bottega veneta or Bruno pieters designers will let magazines borow clothes.