Givenchy S/S 2026 Paris

[Cocteau Stone]

This is better than her debut. Much better. But there’s still something off about it. I get the sense that there’s people whispering in Burton’s ears telling her what to do design wise to keep Kering happy. I don’t know but it feels forced in many ways.

What makes this apparent is the disparity and awkwardness in the clothes, styling and music. Many pieces reek of knock offs, but knock offs of notably memorable designs (the YSL low cut skirt, Alaia perforated fabrics, Ferre white shirts) “disguised” with Givenchy “twists” to add social media traction. Then the styling of some of these is really off… the plethora of swim/body suits, all the show jewellery, awkward shoe choices that some of the models are really struggling with and the constant look repeats. With the music (which I think is the best part of the show) is a McQueen redux, with the use of Public Image Ltd and the classical doesn’t match the collection. I’m really lost with this but I’m not offended.

Something is afoot here that is more behind the scenes. The design team and the suits have made for a confusing meddling. I can’t say Burton is a strong designer outright from an independent level, I don’t think she has the strongest vision at large to really support herself unless she fully commits. She’s a great tailor and knows construction. Identity wise, she benefited strongly working at a house like McQueen to help with the narrative and the team/s there would also have been a great support. Her at Givenchy seems like an ideal fit but the dynamic is very different. I’m glad it’s no longer MW, but it’s starting to feel like another CWK case of mistaken identity and vision.

 

[disco54]

Its so boring I fell asleeping during the show

*asleep

 

[tricotineacetat]

She’s still an incredible tailor, but this show didn’t prove it.

I find that a perplexing thought, given that the outfits she presented did not lack in precision of cut and proportion - Yes, this could have passed as any of her boutique-friendly pre-collections at McQueen but I‘m okay with that, given that she is at a more classical house and designing in this particular, highly uncertain moment in fashion.

 

[blackcherrified]

I find that a perplexing thought, given that the outfits she presented did not lack in precision of cut and proportion - Yes, this could have passed as any of her boutique-friendly pre-collections at McQueen but I‘m okay with that, given that she is at a more classical house and designing in this particular, highly uncertain moment in fashion.

I hold the same view, I think in this current climate in the luxury fashion it’s better to be someone that “do no wrong” and create classy-and-classic pieces of clothings (yes, boring, I know) which the current clients of a label can buy and fit into their wardrobe, than be “revolutionary”, flip-the-table and alienate a good majority of their current clients *cough* AM’s Valentino *cough*

 

[tourbillions]

I am surprised how many of the looks from her first runway were actually produced. Even the ones that would almost fit the couture label. I always like that no matter how complicated her tailoring can get, they are never just for show.

Many forget that when she was left with Mcqueen, Mcqueen did not really have a strong Mcqueen silhouette. He had his design language but he was changing things from season to season. And she took his most identifiable silhouettes and focused on it to establish a Mcqueen woman.

She is doing the same with Givenchy by laying out her Givenchy woman who has been lost since Tisci. Soon when we see certain silhouettes, we will know instantly its Givenchy by burton. Hopefully she is given ample time to build that woman and to finally run with it and get experimntal.

 

[zoom]

Burton's razor sharp tailoring is appreciated. Feel like her tenure will be a slow burn as she translates and establishes new house codes. Im not bothered by her Givenchy at all.

 

[QuantumCouture]

Something is afoot here that is more behind the scenes. The design team and the suits have made for a confusing meddling.

Spot on!!!

 

[vogue28]

VOGUE.COM

 

[FelipeV]

Seriously what's going up with all the mediocrity nowadays? Is it the european water? The weather? Microplastics in their brains? It shouldn't be that hard to create something beautiful and simple, isn't? How is it that Sarah was THE McQueen second hand for a lot of years? Didn't she learned anything? I have a lot of questions

 

[Lola701]

I have to admit, I love the long skirt!
It’s a pity that the collection was sabotaged by the styling.
The sandals, the long skirts, the tailoring, the look on Loki…It just works.

Maybe she needed MAS too for the styling. Out of all the shows this season, the ones with a clear message were the ones styled by MAS. Straight to the point.

 

[jeremydante]

Sarah is finding her way, this was a much improved and cohesive vision compared to her debut last season. I loved how clean the collection was, very clearly tied to classic Givency silhouettes. The accessories ate down, loved the shoes (heels) and the jewelry (earrings, and body jewelry). If I am not mistaken, was this the only show Kaia did?

I liked it, and am excited to see how this is styled in editorial, who gets the campaign and what Sarah will do with couture.

 

[THD96]

There are some misses in this collection, but overall it is much stronger than her debut.

I wish she hadn't included those jumpsuits, they drag the show down.
But the tailoring is still sharp. The red coat on Lina is just sublime. And the coat for before Kaia is stunning, should have been the closing look.

She is taking time to build her vision for Givenchy and I'm eager to see more, especially what her couture will look like.

 

[style_expert]

I feel like the bar has been set unusually high for Givenchy right now, even though, let’s be honest, the house hasn’t been truly exciting in quite some time. That said, this latest collection does feel like a major step up from her debut, which I personally found quite questionable aesthetically.

To her credit, the execution this season is impeccable — the clothes are well-made. It’s refreshing to see looks that actually flatter the wearer, rather than make even the best models look awkward or ill-dressed, which has somehow become all too common lately.

Is it a bit boring at times? Sure. But I genuinely think she has more to offer. This is her first creative director role outside of McQueen, where she spent so many years. I like to think of her as a slow burner — someone who can evolve and refine her vision over time. Perhaps another house, one with more distinctive or dynamic codes, could give her a clearer creative direction, but maybe she’ll grow into Givenchy’s identity yet.

Right now, what feels missing is confidence — that sense of ownership and distinct voice that, for instance, Tisci managed to impose so clearly during his tenure.

As for the styling, Camilla Nickerson is truly making the most of what’s there. I honestly doubt any other stylist could have extracted much more excitement from these designs.

 

[GivenchyHomme]

Her style is incredibly distinct—instantly recognizable, which is rare these days. She has her foundation set, but now it’s time to amplify her voice. She needs to make a strong impact in the early days of her tenure; otherwise, Givenchy risks falling back into irrelevance.

 

[THD96]

As for the styling, Camilla Nickerson is truly making the most of what’s there. I honestly doubt any other stylist could have extracted much more excitement from these designs

You must not be familiar with MAS and her magic of layering then .

 

[Lola701]

As for the styling, Camilla Nickerson is truly making the most of what’s there. I honestly doubt any other stylist could have extracted much more excitement from these designs.

Hmm…MAS could edit anything.
Whether we like Missoni, Vuitton, Rabanne, Balmain or not, nobody can deny that the message is totally clear.

When it comes to editing, her and Templer are the best.
The problem is maybe their casting. I love Burton’s castings and the women she choose to represent her aesthetic are good.

 

[style_expert]

You must not be familiar with MAS and her magic of layering then .

One look at the latest Vuitton collection is all I need to see
I'm not a huge fan of hers, maybe she should take her layers on a little vacation to St. Barts

 

[style_expert]

Hmm…MAS could edit anything.
Whether we like Missoni, Vuitton, Rabanne, Balmain or not, nobody can deny that the message is totally clear.

When it comes to editing, her and Templer are the best.
The problem is maybe their casting. I love Burton’s castings and the women she choose to represent her aesthetic are good.

I understand her message, but I’m not sure her way of styling would really align with Sarah’s designs or spirit, to be honest.
Still, I’d love to see it just for fun for one season and maybe you’ll be right.