Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Designers and Collections' started by Crying Diamonds, Feb 18, 2009.
This looks so cheap. Ew.
Ew. Gross. Blah.
yes cheap is the word i looking for. If this kind of clothing they want to sell nder Halston brand to reborn this name , well it's not good direction.
Halston is probably turning in his grave. I mean, punky fishnets and leather skinny pants at Halston? Were they eating the lead paint chips off the wall or something?
they should probably stop doing this.....this is the what 3rd boring boring collection now??
ewwww this is bad , the fall collection was still decent but this is woof , they need a creative director and fast.
Not very consistent. Aside from the fact that it pretty much all looks horrible to me
Oh, I don't know, some of the pieces he created for JC Penney aren't that great...
i think the presentation makes the clothes appear even cheaper
Horrible, and why are the pieces from such different worlds?
On my second viewing of this I agree. Bad presentation of bad clothes.
the styling and those pieces would belong to Miss Sixty or at least Diesel but not for Halston, what a random and mess
This collection comes off as very 80's to me...
More like he just sat up in his coffin and clawed his way out of the ground, so that he can punish the people responsible for this. It's horrible!! There is nothing nonchalant or sensual about it. I wasn't a fan of the other seasons of Halston. I felt they were to nostalgic, but this is just wanna be disco. And it only translates to slut on the boardwalk.
Yeah, Miss Sixty is what came to my mind.
Can someone enlighten me as to why people feel the need to resurrect iconic labels? Halston went together with an era, trying to make it work now is futile.