Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Magazines' started by tarsha, Feb 4, 2009.
Oh no, this is so bad, it looks home made.They could do so much better with SJP.
Wow, not good
It seems HB always comes out so much earlier than US Vogue, W and Interview nowadays right?
Omg, this is terrible just when I thought their previous covers of Victoria, Scarlett & Lindsay were great and getting better...
I don't know what you guys are talking about, that's a very flattering picture of SJP, much better than her last Vogue cover that's for sure. Is she channeling Vreeland in the ed?
Yes she is channeling Vreeland, and so perfectly, but the cover is awful, the background, hair on her chin?There had to be a better shot for the cover!
To me,SJP=US Vogue.
Well, the cover is not that awful, but I think the editorial sucks majorly.
I surprisingly like the cover.. SJP looks great, but not to keen on her expression. But it's not terrible!
Her pictures inside look good too. Love the shot in the Snake skin boots. thanks for posting tarsha
i like the cover dress. only. the background color is awful.
I kind of like the cover. I'm hating the Pepto pink background, but SJP looks good.
And the editorial, while not my favorite thing that she's ever done editorial wise, is pretty solid because she does a pretty good job channeling Vreeland.
I think it's a fun cover but I don't like the pink. Is this the non-subscriber's cover?
interesting...i'm sure the subscribers cover will be waaaayyy better...
Oh no, when I saw that it was Sarah Jessica I felt really happy because I love her... Then I saw this pink background and this ed that she's looking like a gradma Ok, she's channeling an icon, but I would prefer to see her like herself. The black and white picture is really nice though.
What a nice and pleasant surprise! Thrilled to see her on their spring cover! Yay!
Reminds me Drew Barrymore cover!
I don't mind SJP and I'll be buying it anyway for the content. My only complaint about the cover is that it's not very 2009; the shot is so generic, it could from any month in the past five years.
But that's what you get with Bazaar, and I like the perky tweak they've given their cover design, it's very sweetshop, like the magazine is a sugary treat (that's not to everyone's taste).
i really don't get it why they stopped halfway from photoshopping SJP into young Nicole Kidman. next time bring it on, guys, bring it on.
and those red reptile boots look hilarious.