I mean, I make my money selling archival designer clothes to people that are mostly 15-20 years old by now, so it comes as no surprise I have to do that with the conviction that those were better days in terms of design than they are now.
Surely when we think of the heydays of Tom Ford, Hedi Slimane or Nicolas Ghesquiere, it’s those years and those collections (from Gucci, Dior Homme or Balenciaga) that people think of first and foremost and not Tom Ford (the label), Celine, or Louis Vuitton - It’s almost tragic to think on what a low Tom Ford decided to leave fashion, that’s why I find the criticism regarding the two Peter Hawkings collections to be unjustified. The last few years of Tom Ford’s own creative output were lackluster, to say the least, and it shows by what price by comparison pieces from his iconic Gucci collections sell for on the re-sale market.
None of that really surprises me, though. We’re finding ourselves at a time where I don’t think a lot of designers really produce clothes that are worth keeping, things that exude a timeless modernity. So their worth is really more based on the “nowness” factor and less the idea that they are worth preserving beyond.
You know, I think with revisionism, I don’t attach that much importance in heydays (personally) but rather to creative intention. Nowadays, Frida’s tenure at Gucci is seen in a totally different light to what it was…
So, even Tom Ford by Tom Ford can experience the same trajectory. I bought his clothes, much like I’m buying Nicolas’s clothes nowadays, for the creative intention and not necessarily for the relevance in terms of fashion.
SS2015 wasn’t a critical success for Tom Ford. I love that collection, bought a jacquard camo pantsuit, a skirt and a sequined long sleeved tshirt. Maybe in 20 years the collection will be seen differently, even more because Rihanna wore a white dress from the collection. Who knows?
Are the last few years of Azzedine that great? Not really because the excitement was really on the fabrics and finishing rather than on the silhouettes but maybe Original Alaia will have the same value as current 80’s Alaia in 20 years.
I think heydays are a very specific thing, a very specific momentum that connects many dots that couldn’t be replicated but that doesn’t affect a creative intention.
For the mass, late 80’s to mid 90’s Chanel were the heydays of Karl at Chanel. While I love 80’s Chanel, the Couture collections of the early 90’s, I think late 90’s Chanel was exceptional and the 2000’s even more glorious and fun. I don’t think those periods performs that well except for accessories in the vintage market. But his more IG friendly collections of the 2010’s had a momentum.
To tie it back to Olivier, he is a gifted designer but there’s also a sense of an aborted story in his trajectory. I strongly believe that the cult around him and his work is also linked to an idea of creative intention.
I don’t even think that the majority of his work for both Rochas and Nina Ricci was truly a real representation of his personality. His last Nina Ricci collection was really him though and I remember how people were happy about that collection.
And I think because he is not a designer who really had the opportunity to express his his vision on a long run, there’s this appetite to see him anyway. Nina Ricci and Rochas were maybe too romantic for him anyway so in a sense to see him at Gaultier do a collection would make more sense regarding his sensibility.
But for now, at least, he is not on Jean Paul’s radar. Maybe someone should put him on JPG’s radar. Let’s spam Farida Khelfa IG to ask her to suggest Olivier to JPG then!