Helmut Lang/Prada drama> update*HL-art | Page 16 | the Fashion Spot

Helmut Lang/Prada drama> update*HL-art

tricotineacetat said:
Yeah, I do remember one of your posts in which you said that Mugler´s wife/muse took revenge on him when she comitted suicide in a Helmut Lang outfit - I never knew they were rivals?!

Good lord, this is how fake rumors get started! That's a joke I concocted and told my friends during that unfortunate time that Wallis Montana committed suicide. It was a joke - I posted it here because I thought fashionistas would find it funny (as most of my fashionista friends did, despite the tragedy, when we read the Vanity Fair article about Wallis).

So it's not true! Wallis didn't wear head to toe Helmut Lang when she jumped out the window!
 
baklanyc said:
Good lord, this is how fake rumors get started! That's a joke I concocted and told my friends during that unfortunate time that Wallis Montana committed suicide. It was a joke - I posted it here because I thought fashionistas would find it funny (as most of my fashionista friends did, despite the tragedy, when we read the Vanity Fair article about Wallis).

So it's not true! Wallis didn't wear head to toe Helmut Lang when she jumped out the window!

YOU ABSOLUTE BASTARD !!!!!!!!!!!:o :blink: :rolleyes: :innocent:

I believed every word of your ' imaginative leap ' , should we call it for the sake of decency .
I took the bait hook , line and sinker !!!
OK , I'm naive , but I suppose that I should have seen through your NYC ironic humour . You really must share more of such pearls , like Calvin Klein being a secret heterosexual and the living proof , in the form of a papparazzi photo , that Marc Jacobs takes more than one bath every six months .;)

Still , one lives and learns , and I am at least grateful to know the truth .:unsure:

BTW ,

If you go here :-

http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/FrameSet.aspx?s=ImagesSearchState%7c0%7c0%7c28%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c1%7c%7c%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c7%7cclaude+montana%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c0&p=7&tag=1

You should find the photo of the Montana wedding that I buggered up in my post of yesterday . :cry:

I hope that you will take this post in the spirit in which it is intended .......we in the UK can do irony as well , you know . B)

Pax , if not , and I will apologise . :blush:
 
Heh. No offense taken, Kit. But I put in the original post that we joked about her wearing full Helmut Lang. It was kind of an insider fashionista joke at the time I made it (not the time I posted it here, which was years after the fact), as not many people I knew would have been able to consider the gravity of brand defection as a post-mortal insult to her 'husband'. Like, I work for a fashion company, and it would be verboten to wear any of the perceived competition's items to work! (Thankfully, I won nothing by them!)

We likened the scenario to:

Montana comes home after a night out on the town in a chemical~sexual bender, only to find the broken body of his wife outside his home. Shock and grief pound in his heart and tears well in his eyes as he moves closer her body, his physically taxed form barely able to stand from fatigue, let alone the moment to come. As he gets close enough, the full realization of what just happened hits him, and he lets out a wail of rage and despair:

"W--Wallis? What... what...the hell are you wearing?!?"

Yes, I know it's rather rude.

So, it's only a joke, kiddies! Maybe a bad one, but I'll admit it was in bad taste! :D :innocent:
 
baklanyc said:
Heh. No offense taken, Kit. But I put in the original post that we joked about her wearing full Helmut Lang. It was kind of an insider fashionista joke at the time I made it (not the time I posted it here, which was years after the fact), as not many people I knew would have been able to consider the gravity of brand defection as a post-mortal insult to her 'husband'. Like, I work for a fashion company, and it would be verboten to wear any of the perceived competition's items to work! (Thankfully, I won nothing by them!)

We likened the scenario to:

Montana comes home after a night out on the town in a chemical~sexual bender, only to find the broken body of his wife outside his home. Shock and grief pound in his heart and tears well in his eyes as he moves closer her body, his physically taxed form barely able to stand from fatigue, let alone the moment to come. As he gets close enough, the full realization of what just happened hits him, and he lets out a wail of rage and despair:

"W--Wallis? What... what...the hell are you wearing?!?"

Yes, I know it's rather rude.

So, it's only a joke, kiddies! Maybe a bad one, but I'll admit it was in bad taste! :D :innocent:

Quite a few Brandy Alexanders must have been consumed in your riotous session , probably in some stratospherically upmarket NYC restaurant , as you entertained your utterly fascinated fellow diners . :D

Thank you for your tolerance of my judgmental , if not sententious tone , it's just that a joke about my favourite designer is like someone walking over my grave . :cry:
 
kit said:
Quite a few Brandy Alexanders must have been consumed in your riotous session , probably in some stratospherically upmarket NYC restaurant , as you entertained your utterly fascinated fellow diners . :D

Thank you for your tolerance of my judgmental , if not sententious tone , it's just that a joke about my favourite designer is like someone walking over my grave . :cry:
I always preferred Montana over Mugler back in the 80s, even if I secretly thought they were the exact same person. I always wished he would make a comeback, but ne may be unable to rise abvove personal demons, if my theories have any truth. Mugler seems to be happy not designing for his line, and has been in NYC a lot, partaking of the gay scene. I met him some time ago, buying lycra-spandex tightshirts at raymond Dragon. Yes, it was the mid nineties.

And truth to tell, the joke was told just over the phone in my pajamas. Although I like your version of the joke-telling better! ;)
 
Interview from Index Magazine, from 2004


[font=Helvetica, Sans Serif]Helmut Lang,[/font] 2004
clear.gif
clear.gif
clear.gif
clear.gif
clear.gif
[font=Helvetica, Sans Serif]WITH PETER HALLEY[/font]
clear.gif
clear.gif
clear.gif
clear.gif
clear.gif
Helmut Lang is a complicated guy, a personality vibrant with the push-pull of creative contradiction. While he can only be described as the most European of men, he has chosen to live and work in New York. He is reserved and irreverent, methodical and spontaneous, a doer and a dreamer. Perhaps this same complexity is what has fueled his fashion design over two decades, allowing him to create work that is always refined and coherent, and usually transgressive and provocative as well. Peter Halley spoke to the designer in his studio in Soho. PETER: The idea of starting a fashion house in Vienna is so improbable.
HELMUT: I know. It's beyond my imagination now. I think you only do these things when you are very young and inexperienced, and you have nothing to lose. Somehow I just slipped into fashion quite early on, which I had never planned.
PETER: You started when you were just eighteen or nineteen years old.
HELMUT: My teenage years were so restricted. It was a really hard time. I came from very simple circumstances, and I had the classical stepmother in a bad Hollywood movie. When I could finally move out when I was eighteen, I just had to find myself.
PETER: That was '74 perhaps? Was how you dressed your form of expression?
HELMUT: I was trying to define myself in terms of fashion. I think I wanted to do what everybody does at that age. You want to look good, you want to go out, you want to explore life and sexuality.
PETER: Were you putting together things you found, or were you making them yourself?
HELMUT: I had clothes made, but mostly in polyester, because it was very cheap. At the time, the fashion industry had not yet arrived in Vienna. We had this very strong made-to-measure tradition left over from the old Austrian culture. There were a lot of seamstresses who had their own little businesses. People would ask me where I bought something, and I'd say I had it made. They'd say, "Can you do something for me?" I'd say, "Sure," because I was looking for something to do anyway.
PETER: Working with the seamstresses was, in a way, your education.
HELMUT: Yeah, directly. I had a little studio with two or three seamstresses — that's how we started. Then I said, "Well, we have to do a fashion show in Paris." We did a show, which was completely naive and crazy. As I said before, you can only do this if you're young, inexperienced, and have no idea of the consequences.
PETER: I guess you have always had the confidence to make things happen.
HELMUT: That's something that I had quite early on in life, I think. I grew up with my grandparents really high up in the mountains — it was very detached from civilization, actually. When I was a little kid, I would always gather the other kids together to make things. When the first tourists came, we put flowers, stones, and sticks into little plastic ice cream cups. We were handing them out or selling them — I can't remember which. So on the one hand, I am very conscious, but on the other hand, I depend a lot on imagination for the creative work.
PETER: What was it about fashion that became your sustaining passion?
HELMUT: The most important and intriguing thing about fashion is that it relates to people immediately, in a very short time frame. That's also an incredible burden, because of the concentration of the work. It's so fast and so intense. It needs so much input — you always have it in your head. There are also the deadlines. But a deadline also forces you to formulate. Without one, it's actually much harder.
PETER: Despite your Viennese beginnings, your work has always had an international feeling.
HELMUT: I don't feel particularly Austrian, even though that's where I was born. I've always felt quite borderless. I'm more interested in groupings that have to do with familiarities of the mind. I think that fashion, art, and everything else can only work globally. People everywhere are looking for a certain idea — for things to look at, to dress in, to be inspired by. Of course, there are variations around the world, especially in art. But more than ever such local character is becoming less and less intense.
PETER: Vienna is so interesting historically. Austria was a multi-ethnic empire until the beginning of the last century.
HELMUT: My father's side is Polish, Russian and Czechoslovakian, and my mother's is Hungarian and Yugoslavian. I was only born in Vienna. My family was not from there.
PETER: It's a big place, in a way.
HELMUT: It was a big place. A hundred years ago, there was something about Vienna that was truly revolutionary — and strong. It had all this incredible tradition and also a strong counter-movement towards modernism. But just before the Second World War it was basically deserted. It's been that way ever since. What's left now is just a phantom of the spirit which was there, but that's good enough.
PETER: It's a city that seems to inspire some ambivalence.
HELMUT: If you live there for a while, it animates you somehow. Vienna itself is sweet and mean enough to train you for anything. Before I went to New York, everyone said, "You'll see, New York is really hard." But in comparison to Vienna, New York is really nice. Vienna is what it is. If you have something creative you want to do, you have to leave, or it will kill you. I felt that from the very beginning.
PETER: And that's where Paris comes in.
HELMUT: I have spent a lot of my time in Paris. In the '80s, the city was really astonishing — it was one big creative party. What was so unique was something that is lost everywhere today — you had all kinds of people, people from different age groups, just going out and having fun. It was about contact, exchange, doing things, working together — it wasn't as ghettoized. I found it incredibly productive but very amusing at the same time. Then it all closed up in the '90s. I had always thought that I would move our fashion house to Paris. But in the end we came to New York, which was even better.
PETER: You seem like such a European guy. It's interesting that you have chosen to live in New York.
HELMUT: As a base, I'm very lucky to have New York. It has a different mindset. When I go back to show in Paris, in a way it's like going home. I've been going there for a long time now, so I know a lot of people. But there is also something about Europe that is quite heavy-handed. You'd probably go crazy in a European town after being in New York.
PETER: Are there things you miss?
HELMUT: Europe has this fantastic, rich quality that I wish we had in Soho. If September 11th hadn't happened, maybe Soho would have achieved that kind of coffee-house culture.
PETER: I sometimes imagine your menswear was designed for a prototypical nomadic European.
HELMUT: Things often appear different when you are looking at them from the outside. I have never tried to localize my work for a certain group or certain type of man. Of course, I recognize that what I do is always related to culture because it is made for people, so it has to relate to their lives.
PETER: One year ago, you opened your made-to- measure boutique at 142 Greene Street in Soho. It's like a return to your early years in Vienna, making clothes for private clients.
HELMUT: By the late '90s, I was thinking, "What else shall I do?" I decided we should do made-to-measure, in order to provide really personal service again. It's a counter-movement to the corporate and marketing elements that are so strong in fashion. A lot of the made-to-measure work is for our Hollywood clients. But it also functions as a design studio. We have the prototypes for the collections there. It's like we've come full circle.
PETER: Helmut Lang, as a company, has such a cohesive worldview. The made-to-measure shop, the taxicab advertisements, the runway shows, and the design itself all reflect the same sensibility. And I've always admired your website.
HELMUT: It's just very simple. It's there to provide information. I felt that our website shouldn't be full of tricks or grab for attention as if it were based on computer games. We just thought it should just be a normal extension of what we do. Before we launched our site, our work was always edited by someone else — in magazines, on TV. The entire body of work could never be seen, except by a few fashion professionals. The great benefit of the internet is that everybody can have access to everything.
PETER: The simple design is very satisfying.
HELMUT: I always think that I should look at it again to see what else we could do. But then there's another show or something else to do, so I never really come back to it. At the very beginning, the website designers we talked to said, "Your website looks like sh*t. We could do a lot for you," blah, blah, blah. We'd look at their ideas and say, "This is everything we don't want." So we didn't change anything in the end.
PETER: In your own way, you are very good at business.
HELMUT: I'm not so sure I'm so good at it. I never wanted to do it, but I had to for a really long time. Of course, four years ago we merged with Prada.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
part 2


PETER: As a creative person in business, you have to keep everything together, otherwise things just don't happen.
HELMUT: I think of it just as defending my creative point of view. In the end, I'm the only one who can take care of it — there really isn't anyone else who can do that for me. From the beginning, I wanted to be able to concentrate on the creative aspects of the work and everything that's related to image. But you always have to do much more than you actually want to. There is no such thing as being completely detached from all these issues. Somehow, they always come back to haunt you.
PETER: Is it a different process from the creative decisions?
HELMUT: Yes. With creative decisions, it is very emotional. It's not about togetherness. It's the fight to reach the point at which whatever you're creating is strong enough to fight you back. Then you just have to let it go. You are the only one who can really decide that.
PETER: Your creative life seems to be characterized by a few very stable long-term relationships. The architect Richard Gluckman designed all your spaces in New York. You don't switch from one architect to another every two years.
HELMUT: I think as long as a relationship is good, there is really no reason to break it. It's as simple as that. The idea of being faithful is a good one, as long as it works for both parties. But if it doesn't work anymore, it will fall apart anyway. That's also happened to me. In the course of your life, people come and go. If you're lucky, there are very few people — perhaps one or two — who you will know for your entire life.
PETER: You have longstanding friendships with two artists, Jenny Holzer and Louise Bourgeois. Louise Bourgeois must be in her eighties, but she's doing great work.
HELMUT: She has this incredible quality. When you meet her in person, you leave so completely enriched and touched. I think she's incredibly strong and focused at the same time. She's producing so much wonderful work now. She's at an age where that is basically all she wants to do.
PETER: Visual people like yourself often have a need to create a visually harmonious environment.
HELMUT: I am definitely interested in architecture and interior design. I like playing around with my environment. It's something that I have to do. I don't always have to build something from the ground up — I'll change rooms or move things around just to be sure that they are in the right place. Sometimes before doing a new collection, I used to rearrange my entire apartment.
PETER: It's almost a design warm-up.
HELMUT: I like everything that's an exercise of form or proportion in areas that have nothing to do with fashion. It's important to look at a lot of different things to train your eye.
PETER: For me, the proportions of a room can affect everything.
HELMUT: I think it's absolutely important.
PETER: If I go to a hotel, and the room is...
HELMUT: I can't go anymore.
PETER: I've found people usually don't understand this. They can't believe that it might have some connection with my actual work.
HELMUT: On the one hand, it should mean nothing. On the other hand, if I stay in a hotel room in which everything is against me, I am unable to relax — there's just no way around it. If the proportions feel contrary to me, I can't feel at home. It's not about good taste or bad taste. You can find beauty in every kind of traditional style or in modernity. But, if a room feels completely dislocated, I would rather be in a tent. I won't be able to sleep, or I'll have to stay out all night long. It's difficult to explain, but I think it has something to do with just taking care of your environment.
PETER: How do you absorb cultural information? How do you follow what's going on in New York?
HELMUT: My cultural experience starts with CNN in the morning, which I started to watch regularly after September 11th. I think that's just what you do in New York. Earlier this year there was a week of exhibitions called Americana. I was interested to find out how American design differs from the European tradition. It was a very good counterpoint to contemporary art. It's always fun to watch the crowd, which was so completely different from the art crowd or the fashion crowd.
PETER: And these influences somehow go back into the work.
HELMUT: Fashion is an expression and a reaction. It's a reflection, and even a proposal, on the current situation of our society. In line with this, whatever sidesteps you take should have some humor and some element of provocation. The work should contain some ideas that will eventually grow in the future, and some that just go off like fireworks — that explode and glimmer briefly, and then fade. Hopefully, the consistency of the work over the years adds up to an interesting story. Depending on how strong you are, that story can be short or long.
 
THE DEVIL: So...Helmut, how much do you reckon your soul is worth?
HELMUT: I dunno, Patrizio, how about a holiday to Majorca and one of those snappy new Dior Homme suits?
THE DEVIL: Deal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Has somebody seen the F/W 2005 womenswear already? I´m curious what they (the design team) did, Helmut himself obviously didn´t do much to the collection and I heard some very weird stuff about the footwear collection... like it was metallic leather AND tribal-influenced at the same time...?!
 
PrinceOfCats said:
THE DEVIL: So...Helmut, how much do you reckon your soul is worth?
HELMUT: I dunno, Patrizio, how about a holiday to Majorca and one of those snappy new Dior Homme suits?
THE DEVIL: Deal.

LOL!!!!!!! ROFL this is the funniest thing I've read all the day...you have just managed to cheer me up greatly, it's like i just shot a thousand miles into the sky! Karma for you.
 
tricotineacetat said:
Has somebody seen the F/W 2005 womenswear already? I´m curious what they (the design team) did, Helmut himself obviously didn´t do much to the collection and I heard some very weird stuff about the footwear collection... like it was metallic leather AND tribal-influenced at the same time...?!

i've seen it. it's disgusting. they just did the basic stuff without any hint of a collection. same for menswear. i'll check out the shoes next time i look.
 
faust said:
i've seen it. it's disgusting. they just did the basic stuff without any hint of a collection. same for menswear. i'll check out the shoes next time i look.
Where were you looking? Isn't the store closed? Meanwhile, Kris Van Assche was disappointing for me - it seems he has adopted the same 'easy' fit of Helmut Lang. He may well be the new designer for those missing Helmut Lang this season. I tried on two sweaters and a jacket and they all looked like Helmut's fit on me - no real form, a weird sort of A-line to the sweaters (I have a 29" waist and they made me look portly), and wau too much room and hardly any suppression on the jackets. Ypu have to be really tall and thin to wear these things, methinks... just like Helmut's old fit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
faust said:
i've seen it. it's disgusting. they just did the basic stuff without any hint of a collection. same for menswear. i'll check out the shoes next time i look.

Just as I suspected. Even when Helmut was still there, the Prada people were always advising us to go for the "sportswear" - meaning jeans, t-shirts and stuff like that. They never had a lot of faith into developing a contemporary Helmut Lang image, it seemed to me as if they only relied on what was formerly known as his jeans collection (that is now rumoured to be put up on a licence deal again, without Helmut himself, for sure). The NY offices always had to push the management to get not so commercial pieces produced, such as the Matrix-esque patent leather utility boots, lace up pants (both F/W 2003) and certain evening gowns.
 
tricotineacetat said:
Just as I suspected. Even when Helmut was still there, the Prada people were always advising us to go for the "sportswear" - meaning jeans, t-shirts and stuff like that. They never had a lot of faith into developing a contemporary Helmut Lang image, it seemed to me as if they only relied on what was formerly known as his jeans collection (that is now rumoured to be put up on a licence deal again, without Helmut himself, for sure). The NY offices always had to push the management to get not so commercial pieces produced, such as the Matrix-esque patent leather utility boots, lace up pants (both F/W 2003) and certain evening gowns.

Yeah, well... The jeans and basics might sell a lot better compared to "special" pieces, but the "specials" help build the brand image which sells jeans. It's like haute couture sells perfumes, it's there to build an image of luxury. You can't have one without the other, sort of.

Does the Prada group kill HL intentionally or by stupidity? I don't buy that HL is dying because it's past its prime, that the aestethic is dead.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tott said:
Yeah, well... The jeans and basics might sell a lot better compared to "special" pieces, but the "specials" help build the brand image which sells jeans. It's like haute couture sells perfumes, it's there to build an image of luxury. You can't have one without the other, sort of.

Does the Prada group kill HL intentionally or by stupidity? I don't buy that HL is dying because it's past its prime, that the aestethic is dead.

I don´t think so, this might work out on a larger scale, but if you have a small shop only, then you will end up wondering why you should call your clients if all you´ve got is yet the same "Low Waist Contour Fit" Jean in a clean wash every season... Regardless of the brand, I´ve always sold the strong pieces, whereas I tend to have a couple of designer basics left over from a season past. I think Tom Ford was just absolutely right when he said that nobody´s going to buy basic anymore... people want to feel that they have made a special purchase... and as for Helmut´s jeans... come on, manymany people are doing this job much better than him (ACNE Jeans, Dior Homme, A.P.C. "nouvelle standard", to name a few), I don´t feel like he is cutting a great jean, his are just... average.
 
^ Good point, tricotine, maybe you're right... You can find basics everywhere, and you turn to designers for special pieces.

I know I look everywhere for basics. It feels stupid to buy average quality designer basics when you can get them from less "high-profile" labels at a better price and higher quality. There is a goldmine of quality labels to mine from, it's just that they are harder to find in a way.

You have your "designers" and mass-market companies like H&M and Zara, but there is a segment in-between which is harder to locate, and is often better value for money than the higher and lower end of the market.

And then there is 2nd-hand where you can make spectacular finds.
 
It's not the cutting that I find appealing in HL jeans (though I will say the classic 5 pocket fits me perfectly, as does the boot cut contour fit) it's the 2% elastene woven in. Sooooo comfortable, I wish other designers did this.
 
baklanyc said:
Where were you looking? Isn't the store closed? Meanwhile, Kris Van Assche was disappointing for me - it seems he has adopted the same 'easy' fit of Helmut Lang. He may well be the new designer for those missing Helmut Lang this season. I tried on two sweaters and a jacket and they all looked like Helmut's fit on me - no real form, a weird sort of A-line to the sweaters (I have a 29" waist and they made me look portly), and wau too much room and hardly any suppression on the jackets. Ypu have to be really tall and thin to wear these things, methinks... just like Helmut's old fit.

Barneys. In turn, where did you see KVA? At Jeffrey?

Tricotin, unfortunately I think Tom Ford's motto worked wonders when he ruled in the 90's - it was a much better place to create. Now, everyone and their mother has the money (or credit cards) but not the taste, so to jeans and tshirts they go. At least this is the case in the US.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,216
Messages
15,291,567
Members
89,151
Latest member
alexisxx
Back
Top