tigerrouge
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2005
- Messages
- 19,177
- Reaction score
- 10,596
It's always interesting to read people's reactions, but in truly practical terms, how relevant are those opinions when the posters are fairly well removed from the magazine's target demographic?
Not that a publication couldn't benefit from recruiting new readers, but as an example, there wouldn't be much point in listening to me spout on about the personal irrelevance of Teen Vogue's contents when I'm about twenty years too old to be reading it. I certainly have the freedom to say something like that, but it wouldn't be worth processing as useful commercial information.
So we could easily get a situation where a number of people express a negative view of a magazine which hasn't been created with them in mind in the first place. It's no surprise they don't find anything of merit in it, and they get to say as much - but that doesn't necessarily mean the magazine isn't doing the job it's been designed to do.
Not that a publication couldn't benefit from recruiting new readers, but as an example, there wouldn't be much point in listening to me spout on about the personal irrelevance of Teen Vogue's contents when I'm about twenty years too old to be reading it. I certainly have the freedom to say something like that, but it wouldn't be worth processing as useful commercial information.
So we could easily get a situation where a number of people express a negative view of a magazine which hasn't been created with them in mind in the first place. It's no surprise they don't find anything of merit in it, and they get to say as much - but that doesn't necessarily mean the magazine isn't doing the job it's been designed to do.























