Jalouse December 2006 : Margherita Missoni/ Zoe Kravitz

Forums New posts
BerlinRocks-thank you for the scans!

I've noticed that you seem to be the person scanning all the things that i really want (like that Paris Vogue stylist's feature) and i'm eternally grateful! :heart: :heart:
 
Berlinrocks I completely agree with you. I'm sick of mags touting these new kids (and that is basically what they are, except maybe camilla) as so 'hot' and 'trendy' why is this interesting? Anyone can look good with enough money/stylists/hair/makeup. Why are we supposed to care about their lives other than as some sort of aspirational dream that the advertisers want us to believe? I would be far more interested in *gasp* models styled interestingly or real people doing interesting things. It feels like they are constantly trying to shove these images of children of the wealthy in front of us and it's boring and redundant. Give me something new!
 
Meg said:
Berlinrocks I completely agree with you. I'm sick of mags touting these new kids (and that is basically what they are, except maybe camilla) as so 'hot' and 'trendy' why is this interesting? Anyone can look good with enough money/stylists/hair/makeup. Why are we supposed to care about their lives other than as some sort of aspirational dream that the advertisers want us to believe? I would be far more interested in *gasp* models styled interestingly or real people doing interesting things. It feels like they are constantly trying to shove these images of children of the wealthy in front of us and it's boring and redundant. Give me something new!
Click to expand...

I have to second, or third that. It is all the more disapointing because Jalouse usually has great covers with models. This cover is average at best.
Why can't they choose someone beautiful who knows how to pose ? Or someone talented and /or interesting if they don't want a model. Not he latest celebrity sprog who has neither the talent or beauty of its famous parents.
I do think that as a fashion mag they should focus on having beautiful covers/edits.
I agree with nanker_phledge 100%. Jalouse is getting seriously redundant.
I think it's a mistake to put those kids on covers and edits and hype them up.
I'm not buying the hype nor Jalouse.:yuk:
 
Meg said:
Berlinrocks I completely agree with you. I'm sick of mags touting these new kids (and that is basically what they are, except maybe camilla) as so 'hot' and 'trendy' why is this interesting? Anyone can look good with enough money/stylists/hair/makeup. Why are we supposed to care about their lives other than as some sort of aspirational dream that the advertisers want us to believe? I would be far more interested in *gasp* models styled interestingly or real people doing interesting things. It feels like they are constantly trying to shove these images of children of the wealthy in front of us and it's boring and redundant. Give me something new!
Click to expand...

Karma! The world would be a better place without socialites.
 
i can't believe i'm just finding this thread.
was there a eugenie niarchos and tatiana santo domingo editorial or not?
 
adore dior said:
i can't believe i'm just finding this thread.
was there a eugenie niarchos and tatiana santo domingo editorial or not?
Click to expand...

No there wasn't it was just a picture of the two girls with Andrea Casiraghi (one already posted in Andrea's thread) and a little piece on them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,507
Messages
15,187,627
Members
86,400
Latest member
saadghannam

Share This Page

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->