Lola701
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2014
- Messages
- 14,715
- Reaction score
- 41,046
I would even add Jonathan Kaye or Anastasia Barbieri.Great coats and jackets, they are really the stars in this collection.
What I love about Peter is that his clothes is always a safe investment, and with the Lanvin tag right now, I think it even more exciting and appealing than those “quiet luxury” brands right now.
But yes it is time that he needs to pump up the visual aspect of his tenure. Good clothes need good styling, good photograph to elevate them.
I mean, obviously the woman i’ll call is Suzanne Koller.
But Peter if you feel a little bit of adventurous next season, call MAS. What you need is scarves as belts, a t-shirt with a tank-top on top under jacket under a coat while carry two bags. Or a dress under a polo shirt with a sweater tied around the hip. Try the MAS touch, and you’ll love it.
But Suzanne Koller could be a great idea.
MAS would edit the message, make the whole thing sharp but maybe her handwriting would be too visible.
After Moschino, Gucci, Balenciaga and even Valentino, I kind of wonder if some brands should just embrace part of what their audience’s perception of their creative peak should be.I agree with you that this is serious, but it is legitimate to have a serious Lanvin.
Opposite to Schiaparelli or Moschino, it is not necessarily in the codes of the house to be whimsical, quirky or funny.
The fun came from Alber. That was a golden time for Lanvin, but it was also his own vision for the house.
I think what Peter does has its place in the history of the house.
There are some fabulous pieces here.
Copping is so much of whisperer that you want someone who may stand on a more lividly way.
Lanvin has been a mess for nearly a decade and when we think about the good days, it’s always Alber. Maybe embrace the spirit of Alber can help him.
Bruno did try and we cannot say that Lanvin didn’t have a little moment during his tenure…
