yes part of it is the storywere these shares in LVMH hands from the time of their hostile takeover attempt?
Can someone post the article for those of us who don't want to pay 35eur for a subscription?Bernard Arnault charges on with grand reorganization
The revamp of LVMH’s top creative and executive management is far from over and will last well into next year. LVMH, Chanel, Kering, Richemont as well.misstweed.com
If she is correct then we will definitely witness more musical chairs in 2025...
that they then charge you double in one month and more people had same issues ..you have to then ask your money back lolCan someone post the article for those of us who don't want to pay 35eur for a subscription?
https://archive.ph/ is a great resource for avoiding paywallsCan someone post the article for those of us who don't want to pay 35eur for a subscription?
Dior’s Women’s Business Is ‘Under Pressure,’ but Fixable: HSBC
A new report on luxury giant LVMH dives into creative and management changes, flagging Loewe's star designer Jonathan Anderson as a possible "eventual" successor to Maria Grazia Chiuri.
ByMILES SOCHA
JANUARY 10, 2025, 12:14PM
Backstage at Dior Spring 2025 Ready-to-Wear Collection at Paris Fashion WeekDELPHINE ACHARD/WWD
What should be the top of LVMH’s to-do list in a slowing luxury sector? Tackling so-called “greedflation,” explaining its recent rash of management changes, and fixing Dior, where the women’s business is “under pressure.”
So says HSBC in a new report on LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, which is due to report fourth-quarter sales in the coming weeks.
The bank maintains a “buy” rating on the stock and is forecasting a “slight improvement” at group level — a 2 percent decline, versus 3 percent in the third quarter — and at its linchpin fashion and leather goods division: a 4 percent erosion versus 5 percent for the previous quarter.
“We remain convinced, for the sector as well as for LVMH, that Chinese consumption has not deteriorated further since Q3 2024, while American consumption of luxury has picked up convincingly since the early November 2024 election,” said the report, which lists as authors the analysts Erwan Rambourg, Anne-Laure Bismuth and Aurelie Husson-Dumoutier.
It also noted that LVMH is the luxury group that is most exposed to the U.S. consumer — therefore the biggest winner from any improvements — and the biggest beneficiary from recent strength in the U.S. dollar.
The report also addressed head-on a slowdown at Dior, which it ranks as the group’s biggest contributor of profits at the level of earnings before interest and taxes after its flagship Louis Vuitton brand.
HSBC estimated revenues at Dior almost quadrupled from 2.7 billion euros in 2018 to exceed 9 billion euros in 2023 — comparative to the explosive growth Gucci experienced under designer Alessandro Michele, growth that quickly fizzled and has yet to improve under his successor, Sabato De Sarno.
“’Does this make Dior the next Gucci?’ is a question we are often asked,” the report said. “Our view is that it is absolutely not the case because management focus and brand investments have been unwavering and the brand has not had a major creative shift like at Gucci. Moreover, some would argue that Dior is less fashion-driven.”
That said, HSBC argued that designs from Dior have become “a bit stale and repetitive,” with men’s goods by designer Kim Jones “doing well still” and women’s goods by Maria Grazia Chiuri “under more pressure.”
“Based on our seven-year rule, it could be time for the brand to shift designers for the latter,” the report said, flagging the possibility that Loewe’s fashion star Jonathan Anderson “could take over from Ms. Chiuri eventually.”
HSBC argued Dior — like Saint Laurent and Burberry — drove up prices too quickly in recent years, alienating many luxury consumers. It expects the fashion house to “work on new collections that offer a better value proposition” rather than lowering prices.
It also applauded the recent recruitment of Miu Miu chief executive officer Benedetta Petruzzo as managing director of Dior Couture, which “could enable a brand reboot, focusing on innovation and product creativity, without changing designers.”
HSBC said a recent rash of management changes at LVMH at the corporate level, and its wines and spirits division, also ranks as a top investor concern.
“Our take overall is that the group is not reacting to external pressures (weak sales), rather, going through teething issues as there is an assumption that control will eventually trickle down from the current CEO, Bernard Arnault, to his five children, who are all employed by the group,” said the report, characterizing concerns as “premature” as Arnault, 75, recently extended his leadership mandate to age 80.
“Given the quality of managers within the group as well as the experience of all five Arnault descendants…we believe the group has many qualified future leaders in-house and has, if needed, the potential to attract more talent,” it said.
Not surprised by Bernard considering everyone is bending over backwards for DJT this time around, disappointed in Delphine though. Won't be long before Anna gives in as well.LVMH will dress Melania Trump for the inauguration, Bernard Arnault being invited as personal guest by DJT.
She already has 2 sets, one from Dior and one from LV.
I kind of understand it's basically extortion at this point: you have to pay to the inauguration funds, kiss the ring, or else your products and businesses get tariffs.Not surprised by Bernard considering everyone is bending over backwards for DJT this time around, disappointed in Delphine though. Won't be long before Anna gives in as well.
i don’t think the aim regarding LVMH’s involvement and Anna Wintour is the same.Not surprised by Bernard considering everyone is bending over backwards for DJT this time around, disappointed in Delphine though. Won't be long before Anna gives in as well.
Oh true about the alcool, but they have also massive assets in the US like Tiffany's, real estate, stocks, etc but I forgot to add he goes with more: a second Louis Vuitton factory in the US is planned.i don’t think the aim regarding LVMH’s involvement and Anna Wintour is the same.
Arnault is restructuring his wine and spirits operations and the worst thing that could happen to him would be to have additional taxes for French products in the US territory.
It was meant to happen. The factory opened in the US for Louis Vuitton back in the days was already a strategy to conduct his business well in the US.
Considering that Vogue US is targeted for the US market, Anna doesn’t have any relevance in this conversation.
Unfortunately, business is business. Luxury represents most of the exportations in France and LVMH is the top company.
And I suspect that they are doing the dirty work for everybody because I don’t think all the others players of the industry are invited.
It’s a great thing for Arnault that Macron also does his best to facilitate the relationships between the two administrations.Oh true about the alcool, but they have also massive assets in the US like Tiffany's, real estate, stocks, etc but I forgot to add he goes with more: a second Louis Vuitton factory in the US is planned.
Even though LV has problematic returns rate with the "Made in USA" compared to the "Made in France": the same price, people want the "real" thing "Made in France" item over the US one, and so they return more the US bags to find French/Italian/Spanish ones instead.
I don't think other players are invited too so he represents the industry (and DJT only wants to talk to multi-multi billionnaires, not just billionaires).
So she did not use the wardrobes prepared for her and went with a US designer,LVMH will dress Melania Trump for the inauguration, Bernard Arnault being invited as personal guest by DJT.
She already has 2 sets, one from Dior and one from LV.
It is understandable that she didn't want to risk the blacklash for not surpporting a US designer given that the public opinion toward Trump's 2nd term has never been so good.So she did not use the wardrobes prepared for her and went with a US designer