I made a first attempt to see this over the weekend because I was in the area and it was madness, I got a 4-hour estimate wait time so.. no thanks lol. I stopped by today and only waited around 20 minutes.
It's been years since I went to one of these exhibitions and I don't know if my mind is foggy or what but it felt a bit.. too dumbed down?, and vague.. as if the theme was ✨ruffles✨and let's take it from there. The smells and sounds.. very Natural History and almost children-oriented. Also felt like it could have been more varied.. too much McQueen, thought there was a Theyskens somewhere and couldn't find it, plenty of pre-20th century pieces but with strictly technical information only (no context whatsoever), and I am genuinely curious on what was the purpose of adding an H&M dress.. I understand wanting to comprehend time and lifestyles but you might as well feature Shein or a Hawaiian shirt because they have their place in popular culture, or peasant attire from the 17th century and not just what the rich wore. Odd move. Also seeing some Maria Grazia's work squeezed in between two Dior gowns from the 50s like
'look, practically the same, just more modern!'.. you're not the help she needs!.
I wsa admittedly impressed these four (Dries, Jean Dessès, Loewe and Iris Van Herpen)
That Dessès could very easily pass as late 80s Yohji.. but, early 1950s, crazy! and so intense in person. That Loewe dress is a trip, I couldn't care less about Jonathan's work but that's a such a nice way to open the exhibition.