Michelle Williams | Page 211 | the Fashion Spot
  • Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 2nd, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Michelle Williams

Also her eyebrowns are WAY too dark for the new hair color. They look like they're drawn on with a sharpie pen. If her brows were softer maybe I would like the overall look better, i.e. softer.
 
it has passed such a long long long time since her last fashion "fail" in my books...
oh well, it's pure statistics, you gotta fail at some time, no?

i hate absolutely everything, from top to toe. the dress is so unflattering, ugly colour and weird buttons and those heels are way too agressive and weird.
I agree...& you summed it up perfectly. :flower:
 
i think she's one of few ppl who looks equally beautiful with her long and short hair considering how thin her hair is. i'm more of a fan of short hair on her tho. :)
thank you for the W scans! Ryan and her look amazing.
 
600-williams2-600x400.jpg

600-michelle-williams2-600x400.jpg

Michelle Williams steps out in Venice. Photo: AP

2michelle-williams3-600x400.jpg

Michelle Williams arrives for the screening of "Meek's Cutoff" at the Venice Film Festival. Photo: Reuters
 
wow so many new pics! thanks for all of them :)

i don't like the new light-hair-dark-brows-combo too much though - it's to harsh for her imo!

and: i didn't like the checked dress she wore - probably the first thing i've seen on Michelle that i don't like...but well, nobody's perfect i guess after all!
 
source: wmagazine.com

http://www.wmagazine.com/celebrities/2010/10/michelle_williams_ryan_gosling

Michelle Williams & Ryan Gosling: Heart to Heart
Michelle Williams & Ryan Gosling talk about messy sex, bad body art, and the long road to their new film, Blue Valentine.

pics franchini posted: info:
By Lynn Hirschberg
Photographed by Inez van Lamsweerde & Vinoodh Matadin
Styled by Lori Goldstein
October 2010

Lynn Hirschberg: Michelle, you’re in Toronto making a movie called Take This Waltz, with Seth Rogen and directed by Sarah Polley.

Michelle Williams: I spent the day in a chlorinated pool in my bathing suit. On Friday I’m getting naked with a group of women—all ages, shapes, and sizes—in a YMCA locker room. I have the usual self-loathing and body issues, and yet I seem to be naked in a lot of movies. The nudity has to end somewhere [Laughs]. It would be really nice if the pictures did not get posted online. But then maybe that’s a reason to do it: Just get naked, and who cares if it ends up on the Internet.

LH: Do you spend a lot of time online?

MW: I actively stay away from reading about myself. But I am a slave to my computer. I don’t think that’s good—would Tolstoy even have written Anna Karenina if there were an Internet? I hate myself when I e-mail. E-mail is like a dopamine hit—you wait for it and then you get it. I gave up my computer during my last movie, Meek’s Cutoff, which is a period piece about a woman on the Oregon Trail. I took to letter writing. My girlfriends got some great letters. But when it ended I was back on e-mail. I’m an addict.

LH: In Blue Valentine, out December 31, you and Ryan Gosling have an extremely raw and very naked sex scene.

MW: We never rehearsed anything, and those were really dark days. We shot the beginning of our relationship first, and it was fun and alive. Then we did the sex scenes and it was…toxic. Ryan and I had stopped relating to each other as Ryan and Michelle. Those scenes took forever. I had a long drive from set to home each night, and I would roll down all the windows and turn up the music as loud as I could and hang my head out the window like a dog and scream. It was my escape.

LH:Did you get nervous during those scenes?

MW: When I work I’m not nervous. Work is this fabulous free zone. There’s no judgment. My problems arrive when I’m not working. At a photo shoot, for instance, I feel like a sham. I feel like they’re trying to cover up what’s wrong with me. It’s probably not true, but just my dirty mind at work.

LH: During the acclaim and Oscar nomination for Brokeback Mountain, did you have a difficult time?

MW: I was frozen. You’re supposed to take advantage of a nomination and the offers that come your way, but I said no to everything. I finally said yes to I’m Not There, which was directed by Todd Haynes. I played a character like Edie Sedgwick, the Warhol superstar. She was overt and sexual and confident, and that was different for me. It was a small part, but a big deal for me.

LH: You’ve acted since you were a child—you’d think it would be second nature to play any character.

MW: I was 10 when I started getting paid to act. I moved to L.A. when I was 15 and I got emancipated from my parents. I thought I knew everything at 15 [Laughs]. That feels a million miles away—I don’t feel I’m the same person anymore.

LH: You were cast in Dawson’s Creek almost immediately after you arrived in L.A. I’ve always believed that being in a successful TV show affords young actors a financial cushion that allows them to do interesting work.

MW: Absolutely. Dawson’s Creek allowed me to make choices based only on desire. I was so lucky to get Dawson’s. I was auditioning for pilots twice a day. You get used to a rhythm of rejection. But auditioning taught me to change my clothes really fast. To this day I can get in and out of my bra and panties faster than anyone [Laughs].

Dawson’s probably saved my life. I did it for six and a half years, and it gave me financial security. A project like Blue Valentine took years to get off the ground, and I was able to stick with it. I first read the script when I was 21, 22, and it became my reason for being for the longest time. When I ran into Ryan [Gosling], he said, “What about that movie?” I was surprised; I thought Blue Valentine existed only in my head. Until he said that, I was worried it wasn’t quite as good as I had thought. He validated my reaction.

Filming the movie was like being in a kind of bubble. Making Blue Valentine made me feel like I could quit. That’s the story you tell yourself to remind yourself that you have options.

LH: If you quit acting, what else would you do?

MW: That’s the problem: I profoundly don’t know how to do anything else. Except…I could be a pie baker. I like to bake a blackberry pie. I am pretty proud of my pie skills. Pie could be my future.
 
according to IMDB she has quite some projects on her list :

imdb.com

# The Emperor's Children (2011) (pre-production)

# My Week with Marilyn (2011) (pre-production) .... Marilyn Monroe

# Take This Waltz (2011) (post-production) .... Margot


TORONTO SCREENING:
# Meek's Cutoff (2010) .... Emily Tetherow
# Blue Valentine (2010) .... Cindy

She just finished shooting Take this Waltz with Seth Rogen.

Now in September she is scheduled to start filming My Week with Marilyn (with co-stars Kenneth Branagh and Judi Dench) - i assume that this is the reason why she has her hair dyed in such a light shade of blonde and those dark eyebrows at the moment.

Her newest project is The Emperor's Children and the cast looks amazing so far: Michelle, Keira Knightley, Eric Bana, Richard Gere :heart: imdb:
Book is a comedy of manners set in New York in the months before and following Sept. 11, 2001. Three Brown U.-educated students, raised in upper-crust surroundings and expected to do something important, hit 30 while still struggling to fulfill that promise
 
Michelle was a no-show at the Toronto IFF :(

anyway here is an interview from Cannes: (abc.net.au)

Margaret Pomeranz speaks with actor Michelle Williams about MEEK'S CUT OFF (directed by Kelly Reichardt).

http://www.abc.net.au/atthemovies/txt/s3012395.htm

the haircut&brows-combo is looking so much better in motion - she is so lovely imo!
___________
she is about to start rehearsals in London for My Week With Marilyn (she plays Monroe) and has been attached to this project for a long time (since her Jen Lindley days on Dawson’s Creek)
 
I hope it's not a repost

63rd Cannes International Film Festival - Cannes Portrait - michellewilliams-fan.com
 

Attachments

  • 42051951.png.jpg
    42051951.png.jpg
    107.2 KB · Views: 29
  • 45380209.png.jpg
    45380209.png.jpg
    102.5 KB · Views: 23
wow! i never seen these portraits! thank you so much, she's gorgeous!
weird how she didn't show up in Toronto after all... :(
 
Thanks for the Cannes portraits ! She's such a beauty ! :) I thought the exact same thing about her not being @ TIFF, and especially for Blue Valentine, but she's apparently in London for her Marilyn Monroe project ...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,765
Messages
15,314,949
Members
89,750
Latest member
peterjhonson
Back
Top