NYFW : A Repetitive Bore?

Bridget Foley’s Diary: Coming Soon From the CFDA: A New, Shorter NYFW

The Tom Ford era at the CFDA is about to begin. The new chairman's first order of business: shortening NYFW in hopes of luring back an international audience.

By Bridget Foley on May 9, 2019


Tom Ford’s first order of business as chairman of the CFDA: tightening New York Fashion Week.

“It starts Friday night and ends Wednesday — dramatically cut down,” the incoming chairman, in a brief phone conversation Monday, said of what will be the new format.

In an interview Monday at the CFDA’s headquarters, Steven Kolb, the organization’s chief executive officer, offered perspective on the upcoming, newly truncated calendar that is sure to garner high praise from some corners while ruffling feathers in others.

Ford and Kolb said the reduced schedule will go into effect for spring 2020. It will open on Friday night, Sept. 6, and run through Wednesday, Sept. 11. “Five nights, five days. We call it ‘the 5-5,’ internally,” Kolb said.

Both men were lean on specifics. “Everyone’s on board,” Ford offered, while at the same time stressing that he couldn’t provide details because he’s yet to have a board meeting. (The first of his tenure is set for June 5.) In fact, Ford doesn’t officially assume the role of chairman until June 1, with a ceremonial passing of the torch from Diane von Furstenberg two days later at the CFDA Awards. Ford chose not to wait until then to start moving on the amended schedule so as to facilitate its implementation in September.

“I’m confident that we have the board’s buy-in in this. They will obviously need to buy into it,” Kolb said. “In terms of membership, I think there will be members who appreciate it and welcome it, and members who will feel not very happy with the decision.”

Kolb added that, as of Monday morning, most of the CFDA membership remained unaware of the change and would find out about it with the publication of this article. While the topic will surely come up at the next membership meeting on May 21, Ford won’t be there and the agenda will likely focus on a celebration of von Furstenberg. Kolb noted that some one-on-one conversations have taken place, particularly with show producers, p.r.s and other agency people who work with brands on their shows. He said most understand the change, support it and will take those views to their clients.

The topic was Priority One when Kolb flew to Los Angeles a few weeks ago for his first meeting with Ford. “I gave Steven this as a first project, a first mandate,” Ford said.

Kolb offered a similar assessment — after initially sharing a brief impression of his West Coast host. “We got to know each other personally,” he said. “You know, ‘Oh my God, he’s human!’” Kolb exclaimed in an amused delivery that belied just a hint of genuine revelation.

Kolb called their marathon session “a great meeting,” in which plans for the schedule change dominated the conversation. “We talked about this challenge. It was Tom’s directive, his call to action, that we really needed to shorten [the schedule]. I’ll be honest with you, I was like, ‘I don’t know how we’re going to do that,’ and, ‘Maybe we gradually start shifting things around and we shorten it for February.’ He’s like, ‘No, September.’”

For years, many showgoers have bemoaned the length and complicated logistics of New York Fashion Week, which can feel excruciating, and the marathon’s overall fashion impact relative to its length. Recently, the official calendar has run from Thursday to Wednesday, down a day from its longtime Thursday-to-Thursday run. Then there’s the unofficial calendar. For spring, off-calendar listings start as early as the Tuesday after Labor Day, adding considerably to the show season’s overall density. Some of those showings, often by emerging brands, are deemed “must-see” by significant segments of the audience. (Ford and Kolb are limiting their focus to the official CFDA calendar.) Meanwhile, international attendance by both retailers and press at NYFW has plummeted.

That second fact, rather than the whining of home-based attendees, is the reason for cutting the schedule. Ford insists that American fashion must increase its global profile and presence, and that process must begin with NYFW.

“There’s a choice,” he said. “All of New York Fashion Week moving toward irrelevance or changing the schedule, trying to reinvigorate it and trying to be as accommodating as possible.”

That involves concentrating on the “majors” — not surprisingly, neither Ford nor Kolb rendered the definitive makeup of that list — within that five-night/five-day period, and scheduling other shows around them, the narrower window thus making it easier and more budget-friendly for international press and retailers to plan trips. At some point, Ford will host a dinner with a very focused guest list, intended, he said, “to build a rapport with young designers and international press, [building] an enticement…to come to New York to see the creativity here.”

As for the composition of the various days — they’ll be packed. And Kolb doesn’t want to hear about brands not wanting weekend slots. “For this to work, it’s all hands on deck Saturday and Sunday,” he said. He added, with a hint of surprise in his voice, “Do you know what else people tell us sometimes? Eight o’clock is too late for a show.”

When that observation was met with a reaction other than incredulity, he elaborated. “I get that 9 o’clock is hard, and we do not encourage a 9 o’clock show. But for this to work, it starts at 9 and it ends after an 8 o’clock show. The other thing for us is, for this to work, we can’t schedule around parties, store openings, special events. Our core focus is the show calendar. If an important store opening is competing with an important show, in our mind, the important show wins. It’s important, too, for the participants in fashion week to say, ‘Sure, I want to go to that dinner and party, but my work is really to be at that show, and I’ll go to that dinner party afterward.’”

As for those 8 o’clock shows every night, “It’s the most coveted slot in the calendar, the most important piece of real estate on the calendar,” Kolb said. “Even shows that are really great morning shows sometimes try to shift to a night show. And we know from editors and buyers, they like that morning show. But 8 — it’s the most [desired].”

He acknowledged, too, that double bookings are likely, and that press and retailers will have to determine their priorities and in some cases, develop a divide-and-conquer strategy.

Those tidbits alone suggest that managing the NYFW calendar must be an agonizing chore — and that’s before the shift to five nights/five days. The new plan leads to the question: How do you distill seven already-packed calendar days into five full days and one evening? The short answer: You cut. While eliminating shows isn’t the stated intent of this move to shorten NYFW, it will be an inevitable result.

Kolb maintained that the cuts shouldn’t be terrible and that the schedule has air. From Wednesday to Wednesday, “there was a lot happening,” he said. “But there wasn’t enough concentration of what we consider the major shows. As you know, we’ve always been super democratic because we are a very entrepreneurial, democratic country and we’ve tried to really reflect the talent of all of our members. But [the gaps] with a lot of down time had been troublesome.”

Many showgoers would dispute Kolb’s impression that the prior schedule presented significant gaps. That some of the congestion was caused by “off-calendar” shows doesn’t matter when you’re trying to develop your game plan. Dealing with the brands that traditionally show on the days being eliminated cannot be done without a full-on reassessment of the total schedule and removing some brands from it — certainly a delicate process, and one the CFDA does not take lightly.

Given that, Kolb is soliciting input from various people involved in NYFW, starting with those producers and prs who work with the brands. In addition, “We have a number of anonymous committees,” he said. “We’ve identified people from retail and editorial, and we’re going to ask, ‘Who are the shows that you think belong in this period?’ We’re not just asking American editors and buyers, but also the internationals. So we’re not sitting here, making this decision ourselves.”

The international input will carry considerable weight. “The motivation is that we’ve lost the international press. They just aren’t coming or don’t come as frequently,” Kolb reiterated. “So we’ll look at it two ways: Who do they consider the brands that are important for them to see within that five-night/five-day period? And also, for a brand, who’s in your audience? What’s your mix of international and local versus just friends and family? That is going to be really critical in terms of how we filter things.”

Kolb added that many brands are already in place, and secure in their existing time slots. “It’s really shifting some people in. But the hard part of this is shifting some people out.”

So who gets shifted out?

“That is something that I’ve been incredibly sensitive to,” Kolb said. “I think what will happen, you’ll get an off-calendar [lineup], that will just populate. Talking to some producers, they see this as an opportunity to maybe support some of that off-calendar stuff. When you look at the gain, it’s better for American fashion and New York Fashion Week for the little bit of pain that will come from it.”

Beyond noting that a brand’s international profile will be considered when determining scheduling, Kolb skirted the question of whether certain types of brands are more vulnerable than others. Asked specifically about those in the contemporary arena, including some whose designers have expressed the hope that Ford’s chairmanship might lead the CFDA to focus more acutely on their sector, he acknowledged challenges in working with that demographic – though not specifically in the context of the show calendar.

“It’s the hardest group for us to service, if that’s the right word,” Kolb said. “We constantly talk about it here. Not just with Fashion Week, but in general. There is a lot of frustration in that category about on being nominated, or lack of nominations, for CFDA Awards. And that’s really the industry who’s voting on it, the retailers and fellow designers and stylists and bloggers are all voting for that.

“I don’t know how to change that,” Kolb continued. “So that is a hard group. And I think that that will be a pain point for some. But I think you have to look at how do we make a decision of where people fit? It’s pretty easy to know who the international [brands are]. And really, this is being built for international guests who maybe haven’t been coming lately.” He then gave a shout-out to the home team: “It’s great for you, too.”

As to whether this shortened calendar will have the desired effect of bringing the international audience back, Kolb called it “a first step.” Certainly the path is marked with considerable obstacles. As global representation at NYFW has declined, increasingly, American brands are setting up sales offices during Paris Fashion Week, making it less essential for international retailers and press to come here, creating a circular chicken-or-egg situation. Then there’s the bottom-line issue. Budgets are tight these days, especially editorial budgets. The major European brands sometimes sponsor traveling press members who attend their shows. That doesn’t happen with NYFW, and with few exceptions, most brands couldn’t afford to sponsor journalists if they wanted to.

To that end, the CFDA is in talks with NYC & Co., the city’s marketing and tourism arm, to investigate offering cultural incentives.

“Budgets are a big part of people not coming,” Kolb acknowledged, so investigating partnerships is essential, either through NYC & Co. or any others where there might be hotel discounts or other incentives. There’s also conversation about asking some of the bigger fashion and non-fashion brands to contribute to a travel fund, as happened for New York Fashion Week: Men’s.

That’s the definitive news from the CFDA about the first significant change linked to Ford’s upcoming chairmanship. Then, there are rumors, including one about shifting one New York Fashion Week each year to Los Angeles.

“No, no, no. No plans that I know about. Nothing. I can say that 100 percent honestly,” Kolb insisted.

He said that he absolutely foresees the likelihood of more one-time showings in L.A., as Ford and Tommy Hilfiger have done, and Rodarte did just last season. “I think it’s an in-and-out city that has great fashion credibility in terms of what’s happening. But we have no plans to produce one [Fashion Week] here and one in L.A,” he said.

Ford concurred, with a caveat one could infer as an indication that he plans to show in Los Angeles again, and sooner rather than later. “No, that’s not true at all. So no official, formal shift,” he said of the rumor. “Next year, some brands may choose to do a show in Los Angeles. New York Fashion Week overlaps with the Oscars. If you want star power in the front row, that will be the way to get it.”.

WWD
 
Good start Tom!
Cutting is already a major thing.
In order for NYFW to be what it used to be, being part of the official calendar must mean something. It should be like entering a club and quite competitive on a creative side.

We don’t need to see 10 brands doing minimalist American Sportswear for a whole week.

I also think that NY should let Fashion be a part of the city. Shows at the tent is not really personal. Designers should be able to show in diverse spaces.

We saw in Paris how with vetements and even Margiela (at the beginning), how the location was instrumental in their success.

And yes, the new vibrant guard of NYFW (Vaquera, Teflar, Pyer Moss) should be the « faces » of FW much like Wang and PS were a decade ago.
 
Now see, I've not even seen the fruits of any of Tom's changes yet, but I'm already on board with it! He is first of all proactive (starting way before his formal induction, which just underscores how serious he's taking this role), and he and Kolb are transparent about the state of affairs - a rarity nowadays. I also like his approach - one-on-one meetings with smaller players as opposed to a big meeting which could just result in something like this, lol. As for condensing the schedule into 5 days, :unsure:, I'm glad that's not my job.

They should've hired this guy ages ago!!
 
Any old sh*t can be sent down the runway during NYFW. There's really only like 4 designers worth seeing during the whole damn week.
 
Of course, Gary Wassner would be the first to wail over the reshuffling of NYFW. :rofl:



The Outside View: Confusion, Consternation and Concern Around NYFW

Gary Wassner sounds off on the CFDA’s shorter ‘official’ fashion week.

By Gary Wassner on May 20, 2019

When any major changes are imposed upon a democratic industry, sparks fly. There are multiple questions that need to be asked about the Council of Fashion Designers of America’s seemingly unilateral decision to “truncate” the show calendar without warning. What is the endgame? What problems are being addressed and what issues are they attempting to solve by virtue of these changes? It seems there is serious confusion in that area. Too many “show-goers” complaining about the length of NYFW? Falling attendance by international press and retailers? Mediocrity on the runways? Lack of global relevance and interest? There are multiple competing perspectives. Many of the people in the industry who I’ve spoken with share the same uncertainty regarding the new mandate. The fashion calendars are already difficult enough for us to navigate. How will this division between the closely curated “official” shows (does official mean sanctioned and chosen by CFDA?) and the off-calendar shows help us? Will off-calendar translate to “I can skip these” to buyers, press and influencers’?

If an industry, and fashion is a big industry, is looking to present a solution to a problem, it should clearly delineate the issues first, study them in depth, consider the impact on all stakeholders, and then ultimately draw up a road map that addresses the concerns and moves the agenda forward. As a business owner myself, I believe a successful enterprise must begin with a well thought-out program that considers the rationale, correctness, practicality and efficacy of the plan. But, even before this, a successful business depends upon a viable product. If the product isn’t right, the plan cannot be effective.

So let’s then talk about the “product” NYFW is presenting to the world, and the raison d’être for it. I’ve said many times that American fashion is fashion for the people. Its roots lie in practicality, free expression, creativity, inclusivity, commerciality, lifestyle and entrepreneurial spirit. Any business plan that is imposed upon an industry should seek to preserve and promote these goals and values. I’m confused as to how concentrating on “majors,” or at least brands the CFDA selects, accomplishes the goal of supporting all American designers.

In speaking with the CFDA, from their perspective, the alternative they’re implementing does not constitute a “big change.” They were thoughtfully designed to make the experience of NYFW better, and contrary to the multiple conversations I’ve had with designers, the reactions the CFDA has been getting have been only positive ones. I’m concerned that confirmation bias may have led the decision-makers to believe they’re buying a new car, when in fact all they’re really doing is replacing a flat tire with another defective one.

I am deeply invested in our industry, both emotionally and financially. My company finances over 400 brands and I am an investor in a number of fashion brands and fashion-related companies. I work with major brands, emerging brands, brands that have major global brand awareness but are tiny businesses, brands that have no global brand awareness, but are enormous business, American brands, European brands, Australian and Asian brands, and multiple other companies in between. Many are asking me what the shortening of the “official” calendar will mean to them. They’re now wondering if they should show at all if they’re not considered a “major,” or if chosen to be on the official calendar will they be pitted against another designer who may draw the same audience. Some feel diminished and disrespected. And many of the smaller brands whose loyalty and dependence upon the system is already minimal if it exists at all, are not even paying attention to these issues any longer, further dividing the community. Many feel that the existing institutions are irrelevant already and that these changes just add to their irrelevancy. Traditional press and editorial is a thing of the past. The consumer is the real audience, and the ways to reach it are not dependent upon old-school gatekeepers. Will the shortening of NYFW and the restriction being imposed upon who may officially show under the CFDA calendar, drive a stake into the hearts of aspiring brands, and drive them more aggressively to seek alternatives to CFDA membership, conventional venues, traditional pathways to growth and the runway itself?

These announced changes appear to me to be, as said to me by a trusted industry veteran, designer and friend, “a real insider coup. A shock and blow to the industry.” In this age of inclusivity and diversity, the CFDA’s rationale for its decision, seems counterintuitive. It appears to many to be out of touch, driven by “cloistered editorial concerns” and “ivory tower perspectives.” If the intention is to strengthen NYFW globally and bring back the foreign editors and retailers, then do what the LVMHs of the world do — raise funds to pay for the influencers to come to NYFW and stay here for the duration. Support their commercial concerns. Subsidize the editors’ trips. Incentivize them to experience some of the real thrills of American fashion; the smaller, unpretentious, frequently unknown, often unseen designers and workers in fashion. Support the brands on the forefront of inclusivity and diversity, on sustainability and zero waste, on unfettered design and extreme creativity. Retailers are craving under-distributed, under-promoted brands, but they’re not going to find them among the “major” designer shows. Another reason NYFW has become less interesting to foreign press and buyers is because so many great brands, young and major, already show “off-calendar,” in arbitrary locations, pulling them in all different directions and creating a logistical nightmare. How will these changes fix this? And for the brands themselves, NYFW has been unable to support their growing consumer-facing interests, something IMG is now attempting to do off-calendar. My son Cole suggested that we should break the shows down into two days of emerging brands (five years and younger) like Telfar, Pyer Moss, Chromat, Eckhaus Latta; three days of established brands like Rodarte, Cushnie, Jason Wu, Phillip Lim and Sally LaPointe; and two days of major brands such as Ralph Lauren, Michael Kors, Tom Ford, Marc Jacobs. His idea would allow retailers, press and bloggers to all focus on the days most important to them, retailers interested in finding cool new brands will come at the beginning of the week and remain here throughout the week, those who only have the time and the budget for the big shows could come for the last three days. Have ideas of this kind been considered?

I’m not going to make any establishment friends by writing this, but I strongly believe that limiting who can officially show during NYFW is the wrong approach. It doesn’t address the issues of the fashion designers of America. It addresses the issues of a small group of already well-established brands, the traditional fashion media and global retail buyers, who no longer have a monopoly on the fate of these brands anyway. I’m sure the decisions were thoughtful and well-intentioned. I was told by the CFDA that they were not made in a vacuum, though I, for one, was never consulted. Despite the internal discussion the CFDA conducted, the decision-making process was not open to outside debate, and was therefore, by definition, exclusionary.

I began by expressing the importance of a business plan. I’ll end by reiterating my desire to see this plan, and to understand it in the context of the mandated changes to the NYFW calendar. What are the problems and what are the goals? Are all the issues the industry has been raising being addressed by these changes? Or are more issues being created by virtue of them? Are we risking alienating even more of the creatives we’re seeking to inspire and support? Is what has been decided fair to everyone? Have we improved our likelihood of promoting American brands or have we taken the first step toward admitting defeat in the face of global pushback by generating a more restrictive and elitist perception of NYFW, rather than one of inclusivity and diversity?

WWD
 
In his own way, hilarious, like when he proposes recipes to revive NYFW:
"...raise funds to pay for the influencers to come to NYFW and stay here for the duration..." or "...subsidize the editors’ trips..." (in short: waste some more money to invest in pseudo-journalism and paid-for praises for the heap of crap that the event has become).

An observation: when will the words "inclusivity" and "diversity" stop being bandied around in matters of culture and creativity? As a fashion designer, one should only go as far as their ideas go, regardless of age, gender, sexual orientation, race and so on.
When will designers start being valued for their creative impact rather than their pr skills or personal background? (well, I know this is wishful thinking...)
 
Seriously, this is the most stupid rant i’ve ever read. And, it’s even more appalling to think that he felt the need to do that!

It’s simple: you aren’t a major brand/designer? Fix your ego and organize a small presentation in a nice space. Speak to your audience and be creative in your ways of expressing yourself! A designer like Laquan Smith has managed to get the attention without being considered a major!

A fund for the influencers? For what? The majority of them lives in the US anyway and brands who can afford to have Asian, European or Russian influencers usually pay for it. There’s a whole entertainment industry in the US and the guy wants people to raise fund to make people come from overseas?

And his son « Cole »’s idea is totally clueless. So basically, people will come for 2 days of NYFW and will dedicate the rest of the week to shooting eds.
NYFW needs to open a close with a big act and the mix should be smooth through the week.
Having a shorter week is actually great because brands like Marc Jacobs will finally have all the editors in town for it show.

In Paris, a lot of very commercial brands like Sandro are not in the calendar despite having shops in the world. Sometimes, it’s better to know your place and use the advantage of the FW at your advantage.
 
It’s actually a nicely balanced calendar. It’s great to have Telfar as the opening show. It’s buzzing, it can attract a younger crowd and in a way it makes more sense than having Tom Ford opening it.

Cutting the schedule is only one half of the equation. Now Designers need to step up their game and present collections worth putting on the international stage.
Starting with my dear Tom Ford! He seriously needs to step-yo his game and stop showing showroom worthy collections, no matter how entertaining his shows are.

A bit sad that Vaquera aren’t on the calendar.
 
this reduction of runway clutter is long overdue. models all know that the schedule even just for casting is exhausting; agents hate it too. there is literally NO sleep during show season, as it is, and new york as a market in particular has become this crazy pool party of unworthy designers. like, anyone can show there- that's now how it should be. shows like VFILES, though great to open to the public for casting, but it's like spam. this reduction will help to elevate and quality control what is representing new york. new york has long been a following market, they do not lead. this change will refocus their ability to do that. tom is obviously a genius, so i am not at all surprised that he would make this his first order of business.
 
I thought this Phillip Picardi-penned op-ed raises a great point about the hypocrisy of the American fashion elite and the CFDA's choices. It's one of the most opinionated (and quite well informed) pieces I've read from an editor-in-chief in a long time.

Op-Ed | New York Fashion Week Has a Donald Trump Problem

NEW YORK, United States — On Friday in Southampton, New York, many of the city’s elite will arrive for a private luncheon at the home of billionaire Stephen Ross and his wife, the jewellery designer and CFDA board member Kara Ross. Summer parties for the 1% are hardly a rarity on the Hamptons circuit, and yet, this particular fête has sparked a spectacular kind of outrage. That’s because, as The Washington Postrevealed earlier this week, this party has the ultimate guest of (dis) honour: President Donald Trump.

Access to Ross’ fundraiser comes with impressive price tags, boasting the possibility of earning Trump a high seven-figure campaign contribution by its end: For a photo opportunity with the president and lunch, tickets start at $100,000. If you’re willing to fork over $250,000, you’re entitled to a “roundtable discussion” with Trump. Ultimately, the affair will help to bolster the already well-funded Trump re-election bid, which recently announced it had raised $105 million in the second quarter. (By contrast, the leading Democratic fundraiser is Senator Bernie Sanders, who clocks in at $38.7 million in contributions for the first half of 2019.)

The news of the event prompted swift backlash, and even a boycott of properties owned by Related Companies, of which Ross is chairman and founder. Among his investments are brands like Equinox, SoulCycle, Pure Yoga and Momofuku — all of which attract a distinctly fashionable (and fashion industry) clientele. #BoycottEquinox started trending on Twitter Wednesday, with members calling in to cancel their memberships. Both Equinox and SoulCycle issued statements claiming that Related has nothing to do with their day-to-day operations and that they do not endorse the fundraiser. Neither statement mentions Ross or Trump by name, and both point out that neither company allows profits to be used for campaign contributions.

But while many in the fashion flock have already cancelled their gym memberships — or worse, are guiltily going to SoulCycle this weekend in disguise — avoiding Ross’ empire may prove impossible for the countless industry folks who flock to the city for Fashion Week next month. (The CFDA declined to comment.)

Ross and Related are behind the $25 billion “city-within-a-city” known as Hudson Yards, which is reportedly the most expensive real-estate project in American history. It has long been speculated that the “Shed,” a $500 million events space located within Hudson Yards, will be the future home of the shows at New York Fashion Week. While next season’s shows are still being housed at Spring Place, IMG (which oversees production for many of the collections) has remained mum on whether designers will migrate uptown.

And yet, it appears Hudson Yards’ team has already begun to orchestrate events for this upcoming season of New York Fashion Week. The designer Prabal Gurung was approached to host his 10-year anniversary show at the Vessel, the Ross-funded $150 million “sculpture,” memorably described in New York Magazine as “large, shiny, and extravagantly pointless.” Upon hearing news of Ross’ fundraiser, Gurung condemned the billionaire on Twitter and said he was pulling out of the proposed Vessel show.

“To read that Stephen Ross ... is hosting a fundraiser for President Trump in the Hamptons is appalling, shocking, [and] an indication of their integrity and values,” he wrote.

He added that deciding whether to work with Ross and Related is “no longer about party lines … this is about choosing between two sides, the right or the wrong side of history.”

The truth is, Mr Ross’ “integrity” was already on full display earlier this year during the opening of Hudson Yards — but the various fashion folks who took part in the festivities and published party photos from the evening seem to have missed some key details.

Journalist Kriston Capps of CityLab has been tracking down the investments and finances for the billionaire’s development, revealing that the project actually weaselled its way into acquiring $1.2 billion of financing that was meant for economic development and public housing in Central and East Harlem. Additionally, a report published by Bridget Fisher and Flávia Leite of The New School concluded that Hudson Yards cost New York taxpayers a whopping $2.2 billion, even after receiving $6 billion in tax breaks and government assistance.

In short, any Fashion Week event heading to Hudson Yards is bound to be tainted by the corporate greed of a billionaire who took from the poor, manipulated city funds and is now using the profits of his expansive empire to pad the pockets of the most overtly racist, anti-LGBTQ+ President in modern history.

In a statement, Mr Ross addressed the fundraiser controversy, calling himself “an outspoken champion of racial equality, inclusion, diversity, public education, and environmental sustainability.” A brief glance at his wife’s Instagram account, on which comments have been disabled since Wednesday, shows that she considers herself a supporter of LGBTQ+ equality and abortion rights. (Kara Ross did not respond to a request for comment.)

Herein lies the great hypocrisy of the elite: One can call oneself a champion of racial equality while helping to raise millions of dollars for a president whose rhetoric was invoked in the manifesto of a white supremacist who slaughtered 22 innocent people last week in a spree targeting Mexican immigrants.

One can attend a luncheon for President Trump hosted by their billionaire husband, and then post a rainbow-hued photo on Instagram endorsing #inclusivity, all while the Trump administration has rolled back employment discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ individuals and barred transgender people from serving in the military.

One can shake hands with President Trump on a Friday in the Hamptons after serving an organisation such as the CFDA, which just hosted the Love Ball in support of eradicating HIV/AIDS, and never draw the connection that the president has made it more expensive and difficult for people living with HIV to access life-saving medication.

One can partake in the CFDA’s efforts around endorsing immigration equality, all while funding a man who has trapped asylum-seeking migrants escaping poverty and torture in conditions at our border that can only be described as squalid, and where children are going without showers or hot meals for days on end.

One can have the audacity to say in a statement that they stand for access to public education, when Trump has appointed a woman who is dismantling the quality of public schools by the day, making things worse for our nation’s middle and lower class, while working to place more guns in our classrooms.

One can feign concern about our world’s ecosystem from the safety of their Hamptons home or penthouse in Hudson Yards, while giving directly to an administration that has denied the reality of climate change and has dismantled protections for our environment, incentivising oil drilling and destroying protected lands.

One can go to bed with a man who gives to Trump one day and post her support for reproductive rights, all while never acknowledging that, just last week, taxpayer-funded clinics all over the country were ordered by his administration to stop referring women for abortions.

In essence, one can be so wealthy as to completely insulate oneself from the actual effects of Trump’s disastrous administration — and then use that wealth to further fuel his machine.

In the years after the 2016 election, the fashion industry formed ourselves in opposition to Trump’s rhetoric. With our international flights, our front row seats and our celebration of arts and beauty, we pride ourselves on being an antidote to Trump — to providing relief from his hatred, and promoting values that champion women, queer people, people of colour, immigrants and everyone who lives at the intersections of these identities. Our most famous publications, from Vogue to Elle to Harper’s Bazaar to GQ, have established themselves as standing on the side of progress and condemn Trump on their websites on a near-daily basis. Our most influential designers in New York — from Gurung to Michael Kors to Tom Ford to Tory Burch — have all voiced and materialised their support for causes that Trump aims to bury each and every week. So how could the future home of New York Fashion Week be in bed with the financial underwriting of President Donald Trump?

What many of our upper class and fashion elite fail to grasp is that life happens beyond headlines and Instagram posts. That true allyship and activism isn’t performative — in fact, it’s absolutely and utterly inconvenient. And your worth and integrity will not be measured by what you dare to say behind an iPhone screen: It is measured by the difficult decisions we make when we are forced to choose a side — and that includes who we double-kiss at fashion shows, and with whom we’re willing to avoid confrontation in order to keep the peace at catered lunches and fundraiser meetings.

As the body count rises, as our rights are rolled back on the daily, as our democracy continues its slow and onerous crumble, we have to redefine what it means to be “the bigger person.” The Bigger Person, in this case, doesn’t rise above by turning the other cheek. In moments like these, it’s the Bigger Person who needs to qualify how and when to fight back.

So it seems the fashion industry — our editors, critics, creative directors, stylists, designers, publicists, executives — have a choice to make: Which side of history do we want to be on?
businessoffashion.com
 
... true allyship and activism isn’t performative — in fact, it’s absolutely and utterly inconvenient. And your worth and integrity will not be measured by what you dare to say behind an iPhone screen: It is measured by the difficult decisions we make when we are forced to choose a side
:heart::heart::heart:

I love this Phillip Picardi person.
 
I thought this Phillip Picardi-penned op-ed raises a great point about the hypocrisy of the American fashion elite and the CFDA's choices. It's one of the most opinionated (and quite well informed) pieces I've read from an editor-in-chief in a long time.


businessoffashion.com

This article was flames!

Having this info revealed to me, now makes me feel conflicted. I paid to become a "Builder Level 1" member/membership for The Shed back in February before they even opened. It was to secure my tickets to go see Bjork's Cornucopia.

Reading and now learning that the ultra 1% owners are deeply in bed with Trump and the party of racists, bigots, incel ticking time bombs, mass shooters, r*pists, uterus policing, and etc. It's really disheartening, the Bjork show was AMAZING & BEAUTIFUL, and ever since they've opened there's been nothing but showcases and official productions dedicated to the arts and creativity. To see such a place have owners that support this f*cked up mockery presidential regime in the shadows feels disrespectful and distasteful. Especially to us as members of the fashion industry.

Crazy how Mrs. Ross is guilty by association along with her husband, while ironically she holds such a high position in our industry and has some say over fashion week itself being with the CFDA. The very same fashion week that is a rightfully coveted and renowned tradition of showcasing the best in our industry. Too late to clean it up now with fake Instagram posts that I bet was mostly made by interns or assistants. But as the saying goes, money talks, bullsh*t walks... even if there's a bunch of bullsh*t behind that money that talks smh.
 
this reduction of runway clutter is long overdue. models all know that the schedule even just for casting is exhausting; agents hate it too. there is literally NO sleep during show season, as it is, and new york as a market in particular has become this crazy pool party of unworthy designers. like, anyone can show there- that's now how it should be. shows like VFILES, though great to open to the public for casting, but it's like spam. this reduction will help to elevate and quality control what is representing new york. new york has long been a following market, they do not lead. this change will refocus their ability to do that. tom is obviously a genius, so i am not at all surprised that he would make this his first order of business.
They honestly could have reduced it more. NYC needs new blood and quality ones at that. There hasn’t been a new brand that can compete at the levels of PARIS MILAN or even LONDON in a while besides Raf’s brief moment at Calvin. There is just a ton of I hate to say it so rudely but immature designers (if we can call them that) with LARGE egos that kinda bring down the whole week for everyone. Like even ones with a resume that have their own brands now still rely on selling the fact they worked at a European house to justify their designs now and we all know how that’s going for certain brands and their sales etc.
 
They honestly could have reduced it more. NYC needs new blood and quality ones at that. There hasn’t been a new brand that can compete at the levels of PARIS MILAN or even LONDON in a while besides Raf’s brief moment at Calvin. There is just a ton of I hate to say it so rudely but immature designers (if we can call them that) with LARGE egos that kinda bring down the whole week for everyone. Like even ones with a resume that have their own brands now still rely on selling the fact they worked at a European house to justify their designs now and we all know how that’s going for certain brands and their sales etc.

agree. i am excited for this new season, and it's reduction. further reduction, for sure. maybe they will, going into next season. so happy the madness stopped.
 
agree. i am excited for this new season, and it's reduction. further reduction, for sure. maybe they will, going into next season. so happy the madness stopped.
Let’s see, still don’t understand why they need to partner with Spring studios or any single location. The whole obsession with keeping the dead Bryant park tents situation in new locations going is soooooo retro and stupid. But we are talking American fashion and nothing more USA than a ton of corporate led sponsorships and swag lounges to show in an uninspiring space, yuck.

I also wonder how some of the designers are affected by the whole Barney’s thing because some of those younger brands listed were deeeeeep in bed with them.

Also do brands like Chromat and Barragan really need to be on this schedule? Like they’re both cute (I guess) in their own niche way for stores like opening ceremony and vfiles but do they warrant a seat at the table? I mean chromat looks like anything they sell as sporty neon at HM and Barragan is like those memes of “went to Berlin for the summer starter kits”. I wish nyc could find a way to separate the club kids aesthetic from actual fashion bc it hasn’t worked since HBA and we all know how that ended. It’s just very juvenile and cheap. Not saying it’s not warranted to exist but if they want to step it up I don’t think those names really are bringing anything to the table to get a slot over someone else.
 
Cutting down the schedule is code for separating out the riff raff. Frankly, it needs to be done. There is way too much sanctioned mediocrity, too much noise or, as someone put it, spam. They don't just let anybody on the calendar over in Paris and it works for them. And if a designer doesn't like, and if they truly believe in their work... then they can show off calendar. The press will come if there is something to see.

Who goes and who stays will be very, very tricky. It's the younger designers who are making NYFW worthwhile. It's the younger designers who are also bringing it down. What makes Eckhaus Latta worthy and Vaquera not? I think the Vaquera team has a lot more talent the clothes are far more worthwhile. But that's my opinion

In the end, money and budgets will probably be the largest factor.
 
Where will the main locations this season be, aside from Spring Studios and The Shed, does anyone know? Is there a schedule that lists locations too?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,063
Messages
15,207,456
Members
87,017
Latest member
catsandchoccake
Back
Top