Announcing... The 2nd Annual theFashionSpot Awards. Vote NOW via the links below:
Designer of the YearThank you for participating!
VOTING WILL CLOSE 27/12/2024 EOD!
They won't as long as they are getting a sufficient amount of vitamin D.babies have to go out in the sun otherwise they will get Rickets.
Babies should never be in direct sun, they get sufficient vit D even when they're not. So do grown-ups.babies have to go out in the sun otherwise they will get Rickets.
Your body still produces vit D when you're wearing sun protection, so there's no reason to go without. You need less than 20 mins of sun on your face pr day to produce and adequate amount of vit D. That's what they tell us anyway. You could also just eat some fish. It's no disaster, really, and a really poor argument against wearing sunscreen.
I'm sorry, that wasn't directed at you...I've just seen it a million times, and honestly...eat fish and the vit D deficiency is gone, it's not that big a deal. It's also not necessary to wear SPF 50 everyday even in Oz. I make do with SPF 20, never had a burn in my life, no matter where I've been. And theoretically I should burn pretty easily.Once again you have fail to read my posts in the entirety and as a result you massively misunderstand me.
I never said babies should be in direct sunlight, Im merely against the idea that babies should be kept indoors or not allowed to come into contact with the sun at all which is what you seemed to be implying.
I would NEVER argue against wearing sunscreens. Im very much pro suncream...just look a few posts back. However as the poster from Australia said, scientists and doctors recommend that adults (Im not sure of the guidelines for children) should have regular short periods of time in the sun unprotected. This article would imply that the body struggles to produce sufficient amounts of vitamin d when wearing a high spf.
Yes!anyway, we seemed to have veered off in a strange direction. Back to makeup, eh?
BTW I've read that BB creams should be hitting the European markets really soon...it's basically a tinted moisturizer or foundation with actual SPF (hopefully) and a bunch of other stuff. They're really popular in Asia, and I think it sounds nice that you only need one product. Garnier is launching one in a not too distant future.
Am I the only one having trouble balancing how much stuff you put on your face? Sometimes I'm a grease fest because I put on moisturizer and SPF. But if I don't wear moisturizer then I'm dry as a bone. It annoys me to no end. I can only imagine how annoying it must be to then have to apply foundation on top of that The BB cream is sounding better and better
In my opinion being careful and respectful of the sun is important, yes. But I don't think you should worry every time you step outside your door. It just sounds to me like some girls in this thread feel like that. I think I'll be happy that I'll have less spots and wrinkles when i'm older, but since I never know when my life will end, I'm certainly not going to cover behind a scarf/hat or hide in the shadow when it's summer and everyone's outside and on the beach.