mikeijames
no tom ford, no thanks.
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2003
- Messages
- 5,879
- Reaction score
- 5
I think the problem goes beyond Patrick Robinson. My guess is that if he was given free reign the Gap would have gone a lot more 'cutting edge' or 'trendy', but Gap higher-ups were trying to please 2 different people: those who want "quality basics" and those who want cheap and on-trend pieces. Gap ultimately failed to do both.
They really need to follow J. Crew's lead in my opinion - producing a lot of basics at quite reasonable prices, and then doing more trend-lead pieces that are more expensive and more interesting.
I think Gap needs to decide who it wants to be and commit to that.
while i agree with this sentiment, the gap remains quite the player in fashion circles even as it has this identity crisis. it has the resources to command attention no matter how critically one looks on their latest efforts. the gap needs a creative director like reed krakoff who can reinvigorate the classics -- the heather grey tee, the flat-front khaki pant, et al -- and build on that legacy in a world where other major retailers of their ilk have managed to translate fast fashion to swift sales.
it can do this in a way that does not impede the progress of its trend-focused store, banana republic, nor its buy-in-bulk retailer, old navy.