Disagree here. Chemena's Chloé is formless and unflattering, not very youthful at all. Contrary to that, this collection and design overall has the right details and fits. It's very delicate. I do agree it's his one of his best collections, though.Thank god Chemena did her thing because this doesn’t have the caliber of Chloe.
But Chloe is a fashion POV.Disagree here. Chemena's Chloé is formless and unflattering, not very youthful at all. Contrary to that, this collection and design overall has the right details and fits. It's very delicate. I do agree it's his one of his best collections, though.
Not really. I only remember that collection due to being absolutely shocked at how people hyped such an abomination. I had to look at it several times to see what others saw in it. That's the only reason why I will never forget it, especially because it reminds one of how herd mentality works. It's very impressive, indeed.But Chloe is a fashion POV.
See, the POV was strong enough for you to remember it.
You will probably forget about this collection in a week..
At MM, you always have the feeling that function is a factor embedded in the creative process.the proportions are not as good as that of max mara... and everything feels kind of heavy
Chemena is an aesthetic detail.Weird that people here are talking about too much fabric in this collection, when Chemena's Chloé has sleeves hanging to the ankles, waistlines making women look 10 kgs wider, hemlines unable to be walked in without sweeping the floor.