Playboy France November 2007 : Juliette Binoche by Rankin and Marianne Rosenstiehl

[alxxxfast]

both Juliette Binoche PB editorials and much more ... (almost 1/3 of the mag!)

Juliette Binoche by Rankin and Marianne Rosenstiehl (bigger version)
















source: jpeg extracted from pdf

as you can see from the index there is also an interview with Roberto Cavalli, an editorial with the model Eloise Anderson and in many other photos I can recognize a lot of super models and people from the fashion system
...

see it yourself (there are also the links with Juliette Binoche) :

http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000052oh2.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000036id0.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000010ar8.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000077ho7.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000047st4.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000070ol9.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000062qn8.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000050pv8.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000072wr8.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000055xk3.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000129pp4.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000049vb3.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000074bb0.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000069hg7.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000127pg4.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000051ji3.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000067xc5.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000068vl3.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000057ko3.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000065kh9.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000064bc2.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000056fg7.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000123jk3.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000125jf5.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000113cp4.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000119vc1.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000076tr5.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000075by6.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000073sf7.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000071cn2.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000066kh0.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000063cr0.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000058in8.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000054mr0.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000053so1.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000048tq1.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000040eh7.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000039jd3.jpg
http://img250.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000018ho0.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000038iv6.jpg
http://img251.imageshack.us/my.php?image=frenchpb000037mj4.jpg

my thesis (as described in tmy previous post) that "adult" magazines wants to be fashion magazines and fashion magazines want to be more "adult" is true!?

 

[masquerade]

I'm sorry, maybe someone can enlighten me but I am completely and utterly confused about who the target audience of this magazine is

 

[Algama]

Thank you for posting this alxxxfast!
I liked it.

 

[tigerrouge]

p*rn*gr*phy must involve sexual acts, and to my knowledge no edition of playboy has, till now, editorials with sexual acts, anyway many, if not all, edition of playboy have few artistic photos.

Surely the act of deliberately exposing oneself with the aim to cause sexual excitement in others is a sexual act.

Moreover a vagina is not p*rn*gr*phy by itself, you need to insert something, possibly a penis.

Which scenario would be closest to p*rn*gr*phy - a deliberately enticing image of a shaved vagina - or a picture of a woman getting a smear test at the doctors. The latter involves 'insertion' and should therefore be more p*rn*gr*ph*c, by your definition. But it isn't. Because context is all, not 'acts'. No-one has to be touching the flesh for an image to be richly p*rn*gr*ph*c.

If sexual acts are reduced to the definition of 'object into body part' then alas, there's suddenly a meagre range of sexual acts available on our menus.

For me, what I take as the definition of 'p*rn*gr*ph*c' is the one that's generally agreed on, whether it matches my own personal view or not. For most people, Playboy is p*rn*gr*ph*c. That's the reason why some buy it, that's the reason why some object to it.

 

[adorefaith]

does anyone have or know where i might find the english translation of juliette's interview? thank you