• Share your thoughts on the... 2025 Met Gala!

  • MODERATOR'S NOTE: Please can all of theFashionSpot's forum members remind themselves of the Forum Rules. Thank you.

Prada S/S 07 Milan

i know those shoes looked good, and I saw the back of a transparent trench which is probably great. Also, I really like the turbans and that red camouflage fabric. Sort of ethnic but also very classy and modern... not my favorite collection but that is just what I like about it.

72005038.jpg
72005035.jpg

getty
 
nqth said:
The head gear is kind of Africa don't you think?
I instantly thought of they Hasidic Jewish women in my neighborhood. Julia Dunstall and Marina Perez especially. I wish I had a picture to compare. I guess I'll have to take one tomorrow.
 
the styling shown on the runway is what is hard to get, and maybe her concept too...., but aside from all that, its very prada (imo) i mean honestly, what were you expecting? give this thread a week or two and people will be loving this collection. let it hit the editorials next season and you'll be drooling. thats the magic of prada.


out-of-the-box
 
I feel as if Miuccia's great talent is not creating exciting shapes, but she always has lovely prints both on the Prada and Miu Miu runways (yes, I was a fan of the star print SS06 Miu dresses).

However, the overwhelming SS07 trend seems to be dumb and tacky hats on the runway (hey Marc Jacobs!)
 
i cant wait to see more of the shoes in detail, and perhaps more of the beaded dresses.

i am not a fan of all the fringed items, but...i dont mind the fringe coat.
 
on ethnic look

Catryn horn of new york times also said , that she liked Donna Karan show, but putting caftans on a brigade of dull faced slavic models didnt present a strong a show. I feel Pradas show would have had been more realistic if she had used some ethnic models and not featuring a show full of slavic models. I mean if your incorporating west african prints/colors and turbans..it would have made sense to use some women of color.
 
let me collect my thought, woooofffff, for a second!!!!

Prada has been the most anticipated show for me (and not only for me, i'm sure) since Miuccia's brilliant last season (which i didn't like at first).
Well, on one hand the bright colors and picnic on the rocks silhouettes in the Men's show a few month's ago have tipped me off on having a general idea of what women's clothes would look like. On the other hand i really did not expect..... thisssss!!!!
Well, one thing Signora Prada did succeed on, was surprise. As evident by not only me but other posters in this thread. It's different, it's bright, it's disproportional, it's..... short (!) it's also tacky, cheap looking, not wearable for everybody (for a lot of people). It's more of a beach partywear than the urban fashionista she offered last few seasons. The most atrocious part i found in this collection is something that Prada is usually good at - prints! They want to seem abstract yet pretty, but in reality those are unspeakably dull and awkward, not only the dots but also the little central asian references - really dull and out of place! As for the fringed pieces (coat, dress and a bag,) i'm sure Prada knew the Galliano (was it?) piece of the same exact texture a season ago and thought it was cool and different, so she decided to repeat it in a more delicate way, only to present it as awkward looking garment hardly wearable for a "ready to wear" piece.
The plastic turbans don't help the matters. Again, apparently, Miuccia tried to experiment with a different-looking headgear (ala Men's show plastic hats), and I guess they complete the outfits in some way, but at the same time, let's be realistic here for a second..... who in hell is going to wear this?????? I disagree with whoever said that slavic models dont' wear them well, trust me it's not slavic models.... it's the pieces.
The short shorts will only look good on skinny models, the body type that is NOT the part of the common filthy rich clientele of the Prada clothes, but i guess Miuccia knows better.
Her past collections really grew on me, especially the last Fall/Winter, i do not have the feeling this is going to grow on me anytime soon, if at all. This is just way too raw to my taste. "Raw" that's a good word LOL, i should use it again :) Something's seriously missing from this collection. The sophistication maybe?
And the sad part is... the sad part is this is going to cost tons of money (something similar to this a woman can buy for 100 times cheaper), this is going to be featured in every editorial, this is going to shoved into our throats in about 5 months... just get ready!!!!

Grade C
 
i actually like this. maybe the presentation isn't everyone's cup of tea (but then again, which show is?) but i find the clothes quite wearable if one strips them off of the way they're presented. i like the turbans and the almost exotic feeling without being costumey or pretentious. it makes you think. i like this. maybe i'm alone in this but this didn't feel african-inspired for me. i immediately thought about the arabic/indian culture, also old mesopotamia or the middle east. oh well. she's done better but this one's also quite appealing and personally pleasant. lovely!
 
prada continues her tribalism theme from last season, maybe an abstracted representation of her political identity, or promoting the esoteric sense of "fashion". Not everyone "gets" her shows, but what is there to get, clothes are clothes.
 
review from style.com

MILAN, September 26, 2006 –
When Miuccia Prada is on form, only one thing's guaranteed: Whatever she did last season, she'll be the first to hate it, throw it out, and start somewhere else. Thus, fashion's most restless creative force has nixed the street-fighting toughie look she did for winter. In its place was a startling, destabilizing piece of extreme chic that flew directly in the face of all the current chatter about lightness, volume, and shades of beige.

A turbaned girl in a burgundy duchesse ultrashort tunic—all bare legs and high heels—started the show off, swiftly followed by another in a purple, high-necked long-sleeved satin dress reaching below the knee. What was this? Why were nylon backpacks strapped to those tiny, bottom-skimming tops? Why were these looks interspersed with forties-looking, rounded-shoulder dresses, blouses, and slim pencil skirts? And why all the strong reds, oranges, and jewel-colored satins for summer?

Because Prada felt like it. "I just wanted it to be about fashion," she shrugged backstage. "The importance of fashion." Still, this collection held an image of a powerful woman at its center, filtered through unmistakable references to Yves Saint Laurent (his "forties" collection from the seventies; a touch Loulou de la Falaise, to be precise). These were not random choices; in fact, they are two of the underlying constants in Prada's work. One thing she despises, though, is the overinterpretation of her motives; instinct and spontaneity guide her just as much as intellectual reasoning. She laughed at one journalist's anxious questioning about the short pieces, saying, "I just didn't like anything I did below the waist." Meaning, "Don't panic, these are tops." And, like everything else in this richly provocative show, they're going to look totally wearable in a store come spring.

– Sarah Mower
 
The problem seems to lie in the off styling and presentation choices than the clothes themselves.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,922
Messages
15,242,888
Members
87,876
Latest member
Gabrielle Johnson
Back
Top