Prada S/S 07 Milan

ultramarine said:
The thing's those bottoms are not only SHORT -read, only would be worn by young people with perfect legs- also it changes/distorts the proportion of that particular part of the body -its like you're wearing diapers!-.
You're totally right! :D [Excuse me for thinking too much...:innocent:] I can tell you that what we think is 'distortion' is just our convention... You know... I'd be happy if something, what we consider beautiful or casual, changed in our days... I mean whatever... Take
shapes - Why not cocoon? Why not egg? Why not larva? Or who said your waist belongs here? What exactly is too short? :p Okay... I just want to skip into the next age (like from renaissance to baroque or from the '20s to the '60s) - and I believe Miuccia could help me out. :blush:
 
I think this line could have been alot better.I don't like the head pieces,the colors are nice that are put together.
 
Review by Suzy Menkes
_________________________________________________

Sporty Marni beats Prada's surgical sexiness in Milan


By Suzy Menkes International Herald Tribune
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2006


Milan
Miuccia Prada has seen the woman of the future - and she is wearing a slipper satin surgical tunic and Indian turban, and swinging an African grass skirt of a bag as she strides out on thin heels.

Is she sure? As certain as anyone can be whose millennial mission has been to re- define modern beauty.

"I just thought about fashion - the pleasure of the colors, the materials and the silhouette," Prada said disingenuously backstage, referring to the shiny duchesse satin in vibrant colors - like a strong, deep purple, fuchsia pink, orange and ink blue - often with a matching backpack that often seemed tougher and more substantial than the models with their bare beanstalk legs.

In contrast to the overtly sexy outfits that had a faint resonance of a 1940s showgirl, there were simple black or beige cotton dresses, calf-length, occasionally with a dark African pattern and always with that Prada pretense of primness, as the upper back was left open like a surgical gown.

You felt that all sorts of thoughts about multiculturalism, modernity and latent sexuality were stuffed into the bold backpacks. And that Prada was fascinated by the rich beauty of primitive things: fringed dresses in soft leather or a skirt made up from painted bottle tops, a creative artistry developed in the third world.

But whereas Prada's last show seemed like a turning point, as the designer exchanged strong Amazonian women for her former ladylike elegance, this show seemed more forced, with its turbans, brief tunics and girdles, while the medical theme just seemed like one more take on Prada's eternal fascination with uniforms.

To aficionados, buying in to the fur- trimmed parkas and thick-heeled shoes currently in the stores, Tuesday's spring/summer show seemed to have changed register for no real reason - except to sell more must-have accessories.

Put your name down now on the waiting list for the fringed bags. But fashion's future may take a different tack.

New volumes with a sporty energy made a standout show from Marni, a label that grows in its stature with each season.

Imagine dragging 1980s icons like athletic mesh and stretch jersey into today's cyber- space world. Add the fact that this whimsical brand was once predicated on a child-woman and a pastoral vision, and the achievement of the designer Consuelo Castiglione is the more remarkable.

Marni has moved from country meadows to urban streets - without losing any of the charm epitomized by its kooky mushroom- shaped hats.

"Sportswear with an interpretation, as a good combination with my femininity," Castiglione said backstage to describe her masterly meld of sculpted cotton tunics and dresses, which were loose at the back, but belted at the front and often worn over cropped leggings.

Those work-out staples came with racing stripes, and either peeked from under a hemline in a street-style way or were seen through a gauzy coat. Also in gym mode, a work-out bra top might appear under one of the new- volume coats.

Marni's geometry took the body as its compass point, but swirled around circles and half-moon shapes. Color blocks and artistic patterns decorated the surface.

The collection embraced shiny vinyl - an unthinkable note in Marni's early-bird song. Even the signature wood-and-feather jewelry had been transformed into bracelets of interlocking metal rings, proving that the change of direction went from head to hefty shoes.

The show defined a womanly modernity, and it moved Marni from an "alternative" brand into the big league.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wow, this is SOME debate...
i don't think it's ugly, i don't think it's revolutionary (AT ALL)

to put it bluntly, they're just a bunch of satin tops and shorts...anyone could have done them. ^_^
 
Pastry I totally agree. anyone. they are so basic...I feel like its something I could have learned in sewing class!
 
yeah...at least from the outside...but i doubt that some elaborate construction went into those, i've never seen that in prada...when it's elaborate it's usually on the outside (hence the beading and the fringe)

AND that's not to say it's AWFUL...no, if they're easy to wear (like a t-shirt), then that's good. just put it on, and go.
 
Royal-Galliano said:
You're totally right! :D [Excuse me for thinking too much...:innocent:] I can tell you that what we think is 'distortion' is just our convention... You know... I'd be happy if something, what we consider beautiful or casual, changed in our days... I mean whatever... Take
shapes - Why not cocoon? Why not egg? Why not larva? Or who said your waist belongs here? What exactly is too short? :p Okay... I just want to skip into the next age (like from renaissance to baroque or from the '20s to the '60s) - and I believe Miuccia could help me out. :blush:

Royal ... we're totally in sync!

I completely agree!

The matter is what happens when a designer pushes it? I loved when Rei did the "lumps" collection! She challenged how we look at our bodies! The matter is ... how long hass it been and do you see people on the street doing it? No ... I love revolutions ... in fashion we need one and fast ... we're being left high and dry and the situation is so awful that we celebrate just for a collection well executed (without bringing anything new to the plate)

I like how designers are pushing shorts for men and how Miuccia works the colors and materials ... but still even though it gives me pleasure, it wont work for the masses or market (young daring people might wear it, but they cant afford it!)
 
Lena said:
love your comments :kiss:

the 'real' issue -for me- is that miuccia seems even more confused than for fw06.07 when she tried 'safe and sport' and the new 're-ajustment' could well mirrors the lack of direction in the ongoing economic 'crisis climate' to which the industry is reacting in an increasingly 'alarming' panic.

Thats my whole point! The turbans and the shorts may be aesthetically pleasing ... but even though Prada does well season after season, does Miuccia really think she can afford to be risque? Isnt it gonna be a blow that will affect the future of Prada Group forever? Only time can tell ... and as you... Im a happy expectator dying to see whats gonna happen!!!!
 
72016137.jpg
72016102.jpg
72016099.jpg
72015949.jpg


[gettyimages.com]
 
Seeing the collection as a whole is a relief. It's not that awful, but I know I never am going to really like it too much. I think that the minimalism and the colors bother me. Too nineties for my taste.
 
I can't imagine anybody wearing "diapers" in public but it looks good on the runway:-)) Ppl actually are talking a lot about short shorts and I think it does make sense in term of publicity, which show is all about.

And the colours are nice:-)
 
i do love this, but i wish there was a bit more to it, it is very basic. like that tunic top above would have looked great with a stretchy skin-tight pencil skirt underneath, just adding a few layers (and perhaps a bit more "prada" sparkle) would have made things alot better & much more appealing.
 
visualeyes said:
I instantly thought of they Hasidic Jewish women in my neighborhood. Julia Dunstall and Marina Perez especially. I wish I had a picture to compare. I guess I'll have to take one tomorrow.

Gives new meaning to street style ;)

Some of the shoes are stunning, and some of the shirt dresses look quite wearable, though I don't know who'd want to pay Prada prices for them ... Presumably these short things are meant to be worn as tunics :unsure: :huh:
 
so apparently miuccia didn't have a "concept" for the collection,
even though you can definitely see some influences...
the collection just baffles me...
the silks are gorgeous, but the prints are strange...:blink:
as is the leather fringe...

wwd review...
i can't tell if the critics love it or hate it...

Confounding. When one goes to a Prada show and doesn't find a big message — or, worse yet, fears having missed it — confusion can set in. Especially as the follow-up to fall's urban-warrior spectacular, the collection Miuccia Prada showed on Tuesday felt oddly subdued and without a major point beyond an array of beautiful, very commercial clothes.

What's wrong with that, you say? Not a thing in the world, except for the wow-factor expectation that precedes Prada's every move, and that her presentations bear a subtle grandeur to which the fashion must stand up. Here, she set her audience up for just that: Her set featured a graphic could-be-Eastern/could-be-Aztec projection, and the first look out, the girl all turbaned and satined atop bare legs, looked like the prelude to a stunner.

This established a Forties' tone that continued throughout while never achieving the designer's typical depth. It vacillated between serious chic, in gorgeous, lean dresses and a high-polish pinup festival; the gam-flashing courtesy of shorts; swimwearish microminis, and blouses belted over briefs, some accessorized with utilitarian backpacks for that dose of modern edge. She also tinkered with sheer in girlish frocks over ample undies as well as out-there evening looks made of cast-off bottle caps à la Alexander Calder.

After the show, Prada preferred not to elaborate, but when pressed, cited as a reference not the Forties but the Twenties, along with China, India, Africa and nurses' uniforms. "Beauty is a moral concept," she said. "Beauty is the search for good." And in fashion, the search is for good clothes, which Prada provided. As for a larger concept — moral or otherwise — it was not included this season.
 
^ It's interesting how even the reviews of the collection are kind of baffling! :lol:
 
the only clothes worth mentionin are the black dress stam and the purple polka dot print otherwise it all seems like an April 1st joke. The style.com editors were impressed though
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You really can't appreciate this collection until you've seen it as a whole. You can never grasp a collection with those stupid getty images. The words spread across the middle really detracts.

Anyways...I like this collection very much.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,881
Messages
15,241,478
Members
87,824
Latest member
TwirlPearl
Back
Top