Racial Diversity In Modeling

Wow, you're not actually serious with this reasoning?? :shock: They're showing in Paris, not Antartica! You're telling me there's no models of colour in Paris, more especially, during fashion week? And furthermore I find your excuses about them being more avant garde and therefore less 'aspirational' so insulting. It's the same slippery slope type of excuse which Miuccia Prada coughed up for years when confronted about the lack of diversity in her shows. Because 'it's all about the clothes'. Somehow, Westwood seems to get by just perfectly fine with diversity. It's not as if people would be so 'distracted' by a black girl walking around in a duvet inner! :rolleyes:

I already prefaced my comments carefully. To repeat:

"I might come across as excusing something problematic and employing a double standard..."

I already said that what I'm saying may be problematic or employing a double standard, so I don't know what else you want from me. And if you will read the end of my post, I already acknowledged the problem:

"But that doesn't mean that I don't recognize it's an issue of worth in Europe or America."

Go ahead and roll your eyes, but I simply attempted to articulate my position as well as and as respectfully as I could. Is it so suprising that a considered opinion can be politically incorrect? Yes, I can see how it's a slippery slope and thus problematic, but I would be more understanding of an Asian designer who does not see race as an issue as opposed to an Italian designer who should be aware of race as an issue. Actually, I'm not sure how much of an issue race is in Italy. Westwood should definitely be more racially sensitive given the historical and cultural baggage of her native country as a colonizer.

I stand by my argument that avant garde fashion is non-aspirational and non-idealistic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I already prefaced my comments carefully. To repeat:

"I might come across as excusing something problematic and employing a double standard..."

I already said that what I'm saying may be problematic or employing a double standard, so I don't know what else you want from me. And if you will read the end of my post, I already acknowledged the problem:

"But that doesn't mean that I don't recognize it's an issue of worth in Europe or America."

Go ahead and roll your eyes, but I simply attempted to articulate my position as well as and as respectfully as I could. Is it so suprising that a considered opinion can be politically incorrect? Yes, I can see how it's a slippery slope and thus problematic, but I would be more understanding of an Asian designer who does not see race as an issue as opposed to an Italian designer who should be aware of race as an issue. Actually, I'm not sure how much of an issue race is in Italy. Westwood should definitely be more racially sensitive given the historical and cultural baggage of her native country as a colonizer.

I stand by my argument that avant garde fashion is non-aspirational and non-idealistic.
For someone so "politically incorrect" you're being very politically correct though. The way you express yourself and especially your views are more common in fashion and in Asian countries than not. Isn't political correctness of points-of-view and methods of expression determined by what the majority deems as "correct" (aka least offensive)? If anyone's being politically incorrect it's Benn98 for being rude enough roll his eyes at you to be honest. But this is just a semantic thing I'm picking on and not the crux of your post. I'm glad you recognize, at least, that this is an issue in western countries, but I am here to argue that this issue is universal and it does exist in Asian countries as well.

As someone who also lives somewhere in Asia (although with Asia being such a large continent, circumstances can easily vary from country to country), I see both class and race issues. It is true, class issues are focused on more as many Asian countries tend to be more racially homogenized than western countries. However just because class is a bigger issue does not mean the race issue does not exist. Moreover just because the race issue is not focused on, does not mean it does not exist. I would argue that the race issue is more heinous simply because it is ignored, overlooked, or even encouraged. It's an issue that is even more engrained in Asian cultures than classism is, because many Asian people don't even realize that racism is wrong. Therefore, I see it as a universal issue that is even more difficult to correct in Asia than it is in Europe or America thanks to the lack of focus. Choosing to perpetuate that lack of focus is no different from excusing it. All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing. You can choose to agree to disagree with me or not.

However, I'd like to use your own "argument" or logic against you. I agree with Benn98 that your reasoning is a slippery slope. I'll use Japan as an example (but seeing as I have not lived there before I'm not entirely sure this is an apt example, so even if it's not true, take it as a hypothetical). Hypothetically, Japan faces some class issues, but the declining population in Japan is a bigger, more pressing issue today. Taking your words:

"Focusing on declining population issues seems to be more of a function of convenience (declining population is a more prevalent issue in Japan), but then I'll admit I'm not that privy to every inner working of Japanese society. I have no problem that the media and culture in Japan are not more sensitive to the issues of classism, because class isn't a cultural or social problem here. Declining population is. And having spent a lot of time in Japan, I can understand that country's general apathy toward class as an issue. But that doesn't mean that I don't recognize it's an issue of worth in Europe or America. I just don't believe that all issues are universal."

Wouldn't you agree?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For someone so "politically incorrect" you're being very politically correct though. The way you express yourself and especially your views are more common in fashion and in Asian countries than not. Isn't political correctness of points-of-view and methods of expression determined by what the majority deems as "correct" (aka least offensive)? If anyone's being politically incorrect it's Benn98 for being rude enough roll his eyes at you to be honest. But this is just a semantic thing I'm picking on and not the crux of your post. I'm glad you recognize, at least, that this is an issue in western countries, but I am here to argue that this issue is universal and it does exist in Asian countries as well.

As someone who also lives somewhere in Asia (although with Asia being such a large continent, circumstances can easily vary from country to country), I see both class and race issues. It is true, class issues are focused on more as many Asian countries tend to be more racially homogenized than western countries. However just because class is a bigger issue does not mean the race issue does not exist. Moreover just because the race issue is not focused on, does not mean it does not exist. I would argue that the race issue is more heinous simply because it is ignored, overlooked, or even encouraged. It's an issue that is even more engrained in Asian cultures than classism is, because many Asian people don't even realize that racism is wrong. Therefore, I see it as a universal issue that is even more difficult to correct in Asia than it is in Europe or America thanks to the lack of focus. Choosing to perpetuate that lack of focus is no different from excusing it. All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing. You can choose to agree to disagree with me or not.

However, I'd like to use your own "argument" or logic against you. I agree with Benn98 that your reasoning is a slippery slope. I'll use Japan as an example (but seeing as I have not lived there before I'm not entirely sure this is an apt example, so even if it's not true, take it as a hypothetical). Hypothetically, Japan faces some class issues, but the declining population in Japan is a bigger, more pressing issue today. Taking your words:

"Focusing on declining population issues seems to be more of a function of convenience (declining population is a more prevalent issue in Japan), but then I'll admit I'm not that privy to every inner working of Japanese society. I have no problem that the media and culture in Japan are not more sensitive to the issues of classism, because class isn't a cultural or social problem here. Declining population is. And having spent a lot of time in Japan, I can understand that country's general apathy toward class as an issue. But that doesn't mean that I don't recognize it's an issue of worth in Europe or America. I just don't believe that all issues are universal."

Wouldn't you agree?

I'm sorry, but I didn't quite get the comparison? I'll be clear: race is a non-issue in my country. This isn't Singapore. I didn't say that race was even a minor issue here or that we had some issues of race here. There are no issues of race here. It's not found in the literature, art, laws, university curricula, or history of my country. Our greatest thinkers and statesmen and stateswomen have never addressed race. The only reason that I am aware of race as an issue is because I am highly Westernized, and I only address it as an issue when I am in the presence of foreigners. But for many of my countrymen and -women who do not interact with foreigners or do not even use English or other European languages? Let me emphasize: this is not a first world country. As such, I won't criticize such people for not knowing that race is an issue or acknowledging that race is an issue. They do not live with race as an issue. Our history and our foreseeable future does not account for race as an issue. Unless you belong to the upper echelons of society, the only beneficiaries of "globalism" and "Westernization" (Here I'm being facetious.)

Yes, I recognize racism is an issue that should be acknowledged in places by people whose history and lives are intertwined with the mechanisms of race. It should be an issue in a country and culture to which the framework of race corresponds. Unfortunately, that is not the case here. That is why I don't think all issues are universal issues, especially issues that the West likes to believe are "universal" because that can easily lead to problems with regard to hegemonic power structures blah blah and such.

Rei should know better, of course, but again I can understand how an old Japanese woman in her 70s whose English is severely limited still cannot wrap her head around race as an issue. Language is important for addressing any issue, after all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sorry, but I didn't quite get the comparison? I'll be clear: race is a non-issue in my country. This isn't Singapore. I didn't say that race was even a minor issue here or that we had some issues of race here. There are no issues of race here. It's not found in the literature, art, laws, university curricula, or history of my country. Our greatest thinkers and statesmen and stateswomen have never addressed race. The only reason that I am aware of race as an issue is because I am highly Westernized, and I only address it as an issue when I am in the presence of foreigners. But for many of my countrymen and -women who do not interact with foreigners or do not even use English or other European languages? Let me emphasize: this is not a first world country. As such, I won't criticize such people for not knowing that race is an issue or acknowledging that race is an issue. They do not live with race as an issue. Our history and our foreseeable future does not account for race as an issue. Unless you belong to the upper echelons of society, the only beneficiaries of "globalism" and "Westernization" (Here I'm being facetious.)

Yes, I recognize racism is an issue that should be acknowledged in places by people whose history and lives are intertwined with the mechanisms of race. It should be an issue in a country and culture to which the framework of race corresponds. Unfortunately, that is not the case here. That is why I don't think all issues are universal issues, especially issues that the West likes to believe are "universal" because that can easily lead to problems with regard to hegemonic power structures blah blah and such.

Rei should know better, of course, but again I can understand how an old Japanese woman in her 70s whose English is severely limited still cannot wrap her head around race as an issue. Language is important for addressing any issue, after all.
I'm sorry, you have never mentioned which country you are from. Like I said already, circumstances will vary from country to country in Asia. I'm not going to continue this pointless argument when you won't even state what country we are arguing over in the first place. All I will say is that since we live in a world where multiple races exist, no country is untouched by the universal issue of racism. I don't deny it is less of an issue in homogenized countries, but to condone popular figures, media, and culture to ignore it based on your reasoning is very dangerous indeed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sorry, you have never mentioned which country you are from. Like I said already, circumstances will vary from country to country in Asia. I'm not going to continue this pointless argument when you won't even state what country we are arguing over in the first place. All I will say is that since we live in a world where multiple races exist, no country is untouched by the universal issue of racism. I don't deny it is less of an issue in homogenized countries, but to condone popular figures, media, and culture to ignore it based on your reasoning is very dangerous indeed.

Why is it so important to know where I'm from though? So that it's easy to google racism + country of origin so I might be proved wrong? Or someone here could claim to come from my country to undermine what I'm saying? Then I'll give examples where the racism framework does not apply: Maldives. Laos. Mongolia. Actually, what foreigners often mistake for racism is ethnic discrimination or xenophobia. I find the idea of racism a largely Western construct that is imposed on non-Western issues of ethnic discrimination and xenophobia. The problem with adopting a predominantly Western way of thinking or framework is that it removes the cultural and historical nuances specific to a country or culture. Discrimination and ethnocentrism are issues that can be found around the world. Racism isn't.

Also, when did I ever condone racism? I said I understand that "racism" is not an issue everywhere. I never said I condoned it. I don't believe that either-or stances are helpful in any careful consideration of an issue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
See, at a stretch, I'm inclined to give Uemerasan's statement the benefit of the doubt, AT A STRETCH! But not when we are discussing it within the 'fashion' framework. I'm sorry, but you don't get to address a vast global community, and hide behind a flawed rationalisation of 'oh, I don't choose to deal with race, because it's not an issue in my country'. Not if your audience is made up of such diverse countries (UK, Europe, the Americas etc). If they're so intent on ignoring it as a whole, then maybe they should stick to showing in their own country, to their own demographic, where this is apparently 'not an issue'. To me this is such an insular and provincial way of reasoning.

Japan, perhaps more than any of the Asian countries imo, have been make massive strides in diversity with their fashion print medium. Apparently for the Japanese, Vogue is a Western take on the fashion world? And how fitting is it then that their covers (although terribly executed most of the times) actually reflects that in terms of casting. Think the likes of Mica Arganaraz, Jourdann Dunn, Fernanda Ly, Fei Fei Sun, Irina Shayk Joan Smalls etc. Whether or not race is an issue for them, or whether the team just actively choose to showcase whoever is trending without a 'race' blinker, I don't know. But what I do know is that it actually brings them into conversation when we speak of fashion in a global sense. They of course fare much better than Vogue China, for instance, who follow somewhat of a similar marketing vein, yet deliberately shun Black/Japanese models on their covers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Excerpt from an interview with casting director Preston Chaunsumlit

Within the industry, there has been a circular blame game. Agents blame clients, clients blame agents. Race, as with anything else, is not sacred in fashion. It is just another superficial means to an aesthetic. And that is the problem. Our regard for race is very deep-seated and beyond fashion, yet fashion takes it on as it would take on anything else. This also includes how the consumer regards race. This is what clients mean when they say it is dependent on their customer or audience–this is what their customer wants, this is the person that is going to wear and buy the clothes, this is our brand identity, etc. I think this circular blame within the industry is very shortsighted. We have to blame the consumer and ourselves as a society. It is not fashion’s responsibility to be a social justice cause and if it ever poses itself to be, it is just using it as superficial means to sell products.

When you’re casting for a brand, are they ever explicit about casting mostly white models?

To be honest, very rarely. This is not a good thing necessarily. It is understood all models are white. White is the standard. Unless otherwise requested, it is pretty much understood “model” means a white one. Of course, I am selectively obtuse and bring in everything. Not to antagonize, but more to show and hopefully inspire a client to think outside is understood. Half the time it fails though. Clients are confronted with their own implicit racism, internalized or not, and when forced to demand a white-only cast, that is a position I feel I have forced them to confront. The problem with racism in the West, especially when working in a commercial industry, is that most of it is implicit. These clients are usually white, or have to answer to a white man, or a white consumer. Then there are the Asian clients (specifically Japanese, which is a whole other can of beans) who have this white worship, and of course if its a more “urban” concept, have this strange exotification for Blackness and Black bodies. As a person of color, as an Asian person, I do relish at the point when a client, frustrated with me, can confront me in all seriousness and say to my face “NO ASIANS” or “WE NEED A WHITE GIRL HERE OR YOU ARE FIRED.” It is usually the white clients who get really riled up and upset and apologetic. “I am not a racist. I really am not! I am a good person. My best friend is Black. My favorite Aunt is Korean…”, etc.

http://www.space-matters.com/2016/05/conversation-with-preston-chaunsumlit-about-casting-and-racism/
 
Brazilian models: why are all top models white?

By Declan Eytan for vogue.it
Nov. 3, 2016


Gisele Bündchen, Isabeli Fontana, Alessandra Ambrosio, Adriana Lima, Raquel Zimmermann. In a country where 50% of the population is filed under the black/mixed race black category, why is it that famous top models are all white girls?

Last week, Brazil’s fashion capital São Paulo hosted the 42nd edition of São Paulo Fashion Week. Considered by most to be South America’s premier fashion week, it’s widely praised for being a globally-acclaimed platform to both regional newcomers as well as established brands. Nonetheless, each season the same question arises, which depicts the overall state of Brazil’s emerging fashion industry: where are the black models?

The country has successfully launched the careers of industry favourites such as Gisele Bündchen, Isabeli Fontana, Alessandra Ambrosio, Adriana Lima, Raquel Zimmermann, Ana Beatriz Barros, Fernanda Tavares, plus Caroline Trentini. And those aren’t even all of them. When it comes to their darker-skinned fellow Brazilians however, the few which have been pushed by local mother agents and subsequently achieved international star status, can be counted on less than one hand: that is, Emanuela De Paula, Lais Ribeiro and Gracie Carvalho.

Even if some Brazilian models of African descent are walking their native country’s runways, they’re vastly outnumbered by their Causasian counterparts. This, in a country where more than 50% of its population is filed under the black/mixed-raced black category.

We reached out to Vogue Brasil Editor-in-Chief Daniela Falcão over the phone, to discuss Brazil’s struggle with equal opportunities for models of colour. Plus we took a closer look at what’s being done locally to heal the wounds of a nation which, to the outside world appears to celebrate its ethnic diversity, but on the inside seems reluctant to embrace it.

In the year 2009 São Paulo fashion week organizers agreed to impose quotas, requiring 10% of models appearing on the runway to be either black or indigenous. The quota has subsequently been repealed, but have you noticed an improvement in diversity since?

I can tell there’s been much improvement when comparing today’s situation on the Brazilian runways, to that of the year 2009/2010. But it’s far from ideal. It’s an endless discussion where on the one side, you have designers accusing the agencies of not providing them with enough black models. On the other side, you have agencies claiming they don’t provide designers with more black models since they don’t book them.

In a country as ethnically diverse as Brazil, featuring white models on magazine covers is considered the norm, while models of colour are considered the exception. How so?

Brazilian magazines don’t put black models on the cover as much as you would imagine. I remember that while I was in journalism school, I was taught that Brazilians don’t like to see a reflection of themselves on magazine covers. That Brazilians would look for something more glamorous, strongly influenced by a European aesthetic. It’s typical of the low self-esteem you’ll find in many formerly colonized countries.

Since 2011, Vogue Brasil produces an annual issue entirely dedicated to models of colour. Why is such an issue necessary in Brazil?

It was about changing attitudes. Many designers didn’t even consider the lack of black models an issue at first. We didn’t just want to create a buzz, and it’s not as though we only want to put a black model on the cover once a year. When we did it for the first time in 2011, we put Emanuela de Paula on the cover. This year’s issue featured Naomi Campbell as a cover girl. A positive thing to note, is that since that first issue in 2011, the initiative has been well-received in Brazil. We didn’t receive any negative feedback, and in terms of sales it also does well. In addition, it has triggered local modelling agencies to contact us as soon as they scout a black girl.

You’ve frequently placed Naomi Campbell on your cover, and for the February issue Vogue Brasil featured Jourdan Dunn on its cover for the first time. Why not use your covers as a launching pad for the careers of black Brazilian models however?

The Brazilian audience responds to models that it knows. It’s a shame, but I don’t have Brazilian black models that are known enough to put on the cover. This is why we use girls like Naomi, Jourdan and Joan Smalls. We do push for black Brazilian models to be featured in the front of book, and we aim to put 3 to 4 black or mulatta models on the cover each year. Throughout the year 2016 we’ve tried to cast as many dark skin black models as possible, which was a mission I set out with our fashion team. It’s not like it’s forbidden to use a white girl for a story, but when I notice our stylists have done three consecutive stories with a white girl, I’ll tell them to change things up.

Often the level of diversity on runways and in advertisements, reflects the amount of ethnic diversity behind the scenes. Would you say that black Brazilian designers are strongly represented in your local fashion industry?

I never thought of that, but indeed. In Brazil, fashion is still something that is very much connected to the white elite. We don’t have a lot of black designers or stylists. As fashion is starting to become more popular however, it attracts more people from different ethnic and social backgrounds. When I look at my current team of interns for example, there is a much higher level of ethnic diversity than when I started this job 11 years ago.

How have you seen the attitude of Brazilian modelling agencies evolve over the past years, when it comes to their scouting practices?

Agencies were lazier in the past. When they’d scout for models they would only look in the Southeast region of Brazil – which is the land of white girls. It’s the richer part of the country and it’s where Brazil’s fashion industry is based. Most who live in this part of the country are of Italian or German descent and many of our top models come from this region. So it’s not just a matter of skin tone, where you come from is also a factor. Step by step this is changing, as more girls are being scouted in the North region of the country as well. Our stylists are constantly on the lookout also, so we’re changing the trend of waiting for the agencies.

Are local mass market brands more likely to feature black models in their ad campaigns, compared to upmarket brands?

For advertisements, they often want the famous Brazilian models. They’ll go for Isabeli Fontana, Alessandra Ambrosio or Gisele. You’ll see very few new faces in local ads. So the challenge is to make the black girls more famous by having them appear on the runway constantly and in the magazines.

So how do you see the situation developing in the next 3 years?

The first step is to increase the level of diversity on the runway. The second step is to increase the level of diversity on magazine covers. I’d say we’ve accomplished our goal once we’re able to put black models on the cover without anyone even commenting. In Brazil there is no reason for black not to be considered mainstream.

vogue.it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I always asked the same question to myself. Brazil is so beautifully diversed but at the same time so white.
 
^ I´m sorry but her answer is a lot of bunk. ``The Brazilian audience responds to models that it knows. It’s a shame, but I don’t have Brazilian black models that are known enough to put on the cover. This is why we use girls like Naomi, Jourdan and Joan Smalls. [...]´´like seriously? Come on what a lame attempt of an excuse. I hate when Vogue editors hide behind those answers: just have the guts to say you have NOT done a real effort woman, at least be real.
 
Nice to hear Ysaunny Brito had the most successful Vogue Mexico cover of 2016!! So while Daniela, who luckily left Vogue Brazil, may bang on that Brazilians only respond to who they know, it's nice to see the rest of LA embrace someone new!

Lineisy had all the makings to be the leader of the Dominican pack, much like Gisele was for Brazilians, Natalia/Natasha for the Russians, or Lara/Doutzen for the Dutch. But unfortunately her unassuming attitude and terrible print presence won't help at all.

‘Dominican Power’ on the Catwalk

A wave of new models from the Dominican Republic are scoring major campaigns and runway gigs at fashion week. But what — or who — is really behind their unstoppable ascent?

By Graciela Martin
March 10, 2017 05:20

PARIS, France — Before boarding a flight to Paris where she would tear up the runways for Dior, Saint Laurent and Louis Vuitton, Manuela Sánchez posted a very important photo on her Instagram feed while working in Milan.

“Dominican power backstage,” wrote the season’s breakout star, next to a snap taken with fellow Santo Domingo-native Lineisy Montero at the Missoni show. Adding a few muscle-flexing emojis for good measure, she then thanked Montero “for opening the door to a new generation of (afro) Dominican models in the fashion industry.”

Sánchez is part an alluring army of new models from the Dominican Republic making an invasion in all the fashion capitals. Firm favourites during fashion week and increasingly cast for major ad campaigns, this season saw even more hail from the small Caribbean nation. Nearly 20 brands hired three or more Dominican models at the Autumn/Winter 2017 shows, including big hitters like Marc Jacobs, Burberry and Prada. So if they seemed everywhere, it is because they were.

While girls of Dominican descent are not entirely new to the high echelons of fashion — Omahyra Mota, Arlenis Sosa and Rose Cordero set some precedent — it was the success of Montero what paved the way for the newest guard.

Passionate Scouts in the Caribbean

“Lineisy marked a before and after; she opened the door to a new generation of models that are now seen in all of the international runways,” says Sandro Guzmán founder and director of Ossygeno Model Management, the mother agency of most top Dominican names, like Montero, Balmain star Ysaunny Brito, Luisana González, and Versace favourite Richie Beras, to name just a few.

Although their efforts may have only paid off recently, bringing Dominican women to the forefront of fashion is the culmination of more than 10 years hard work for Guzmán and another model agent from the Dominican Republic, Luis Menieur.

New Faces editor of Models.com, Rosie Daly says it has been greatly due to the “visionary and directorial scouting” of these two men. Menieur was behind Arlenis Sosa's success and scouted Sánchez as well as rising stars like Genesis Vallejo and Liany Gómez. “They’ve given the fashion industry what it wanted before we even knew that we wanted it," she adds.

“Many go off straight to do exclusives, like Lineisy with Prada or Luisana González with Louis Vuitton, but they were ‘made’ in Domincan Republic," says Guzmán.

Both Montero and González landed contracts with Next and Ford, respectively, right out of the Ossygeno Models Contest (formerly the Elite Model Look for which Guzmán has held the local franchise since 2006). The event also served as a springboard for Kenzo campaign star Amelia Rami, Mulberry’s Chanel de León and many others. “Now international agencies are constantly in touch awaiting the next great discovery,” says Guzmán.

A few noteworthy male models have also taken the industry by storm. Most, if not all, have walked for Givenchy, including Ossygeno’s Oscar Lasarte and Keudy Pérez and Menieur’s Keith Hernández, Rafael Pérez and Francisco Peralta. The latter also starred in a campaign for the French house, as well as Armani.

A Unique Genetic Cocktail

The Dominican Republic has been hailed ‘the new Brazil’ thanks to its growing reputation as a wellspring for beautiful models. But given that the Spanish-speaking nation only shares a small island in the Caribbean with Haiti, it is on an entirely different scale. With just 10 million people, it has only a tiny fraction of the Amazonian country’s 202 million population.

Brazil’s network of agencies and its established fashion industry gives casting agents a much greater pool of potential beauties to draw from, but it has not always surfaced models as diverse as its multi-ethnic society. Many successful international faces from Brazil have been of light-skinned European ancestry.

Like most of Latin America, the Dominican Republic is made up of a diverse racial mix. The difference, however, is in the genetic cocktail of the country. More than 70 percent of the population is mixed race – mainly with African, indigenous Taíno from Hispaniola and European roots.

“What makes the Dominican Republic very appealing is the ethnic mix of people; you can get a great spectrum of girls and even boys,” says casting director James Scully.

Models.com's Daly sees the Dominican Republic as a “wildcard”. “There's no predicting the type of beauty that will come out next, which is exciting,” she says. But it is [the models'] versatility that is as important as the "vibrancy and energy” they bring to a shoot or show. “Dominican girls can embody both the classic beauty of black women and va-va-voom qualities of Latinas and so much more, they can be quirky or hard-edged or very soft, intellectual, androgynous, ultra feminine,” she adds.

The new editor of Vogue Mexico and Latin America, Karla Martinez, agrees: “These girls have a more citizen-of-the-world look; they could be from the Dominican Republic, but they could also be French or American.”

And with the United States being home to almost one million Dominicans, it is no surprise America has spawned talents like Long Island-raised Dilone, who has fronted campaigns for Stella McCartney, Versace and Balmain, and Dominican-American twins Jan Carlos Díaz and Hector Díaz who have worked for Valentino and Zara.

“Hispanic women have been underrepresented in fashion for quite some time; it’s refreshing to see the evolution of a culture in an image that has always deserved to be featured prominently,” says Kyle Hagler, president of Next Models New York.

“Today, if people don’t see themselves represented they will go and find it somewhere else; you don’t have to see [models] in a fashion magazine anymore,” adds Scully. “That’s making their presence a lot more appealing to clients and potentially to people who hire them for a show or advertisement.”

Guzmán notes that young Dominican girls — who “at 12 years of age are gifted a hair straightener” — now look up to models like Montero. They are more vocal about celebrating their ethnic traits and embracing their natural curls, he says.

Carlos Lamarche, journalist and contributor for CNN en Español, agrees that beauty perceptions are slowly changing, but argues that the Caribbean nation still faces strong racial prejudices. “Even after all of Arlenis Sosa’s international success, she’s never done a campaign in the Dominican Republic,” he adds.

Scully remembers a time when he could count on one hand the number of times a black model opened a major menswear show. “[But] now seven, eight, nine shows open with black models. That's a big deal and we've come a long way in that sense [and] the whole boom of Dominican models just reinforces that fact."

The current fashion climate, besides pointing to a wider representation of racial diversity, is becoming a celebration of individuality in a much broader sense and Dominican models are a good example of that. Scully argues that the relevance of social media and the emergence of brands like Hood by Air and Vetements with a certain sub-culture aesthetic have led to the search for more “individual” casting.

Ivan Bart, president of IMG, which represents Dominican talents like Gucci favourite Elibeidy Danis and Jillian Mercado, a disabled Dominican-American model with muscular dystrophy, believes this is the way forward.

“As much as it’s now about the Dominican Republic models it's about so many others [who] are having great moments in great places in different backgrounds, in different sizes, different stories and we'll just keep pushing all the conversations," says Bart, who recently signed hijab-wearing Somali-American model Halima Aden.

The Personality Factor

Clearly, the rise of the Dominicans connects with the broader conversation on diversity currently taking place in fashion. But for many insiders, it goes beyond physicality altogether. “Today [a model’s look] is appreciated with a more intelligent view, where other values, qualities and personalities are taken into account,” says Pamela Ocampo, editor-in-chief of L'Officiel Mexico.

Having an attitude "you can fall in love with" is an important trait many Dominican models have, according to Jose Duran, director of Viva Models Barcelona, who represents Manuela Sánchez. “It’s key to getting your foot in the industry and staying there,” he says.

Luisana González, also thinks their personality and presence is key. "I think that's what makes us stand out," she says. But according to Ysaunny, there is something even more important. "We're always in a good mood and prepared to work," she adds.

Indeed, like the wave of Russians before them, most of the Dominicans in this wave have become known for their strong work ethic. For many who find success, it is a rags to riches story, as many come from very humble backgrounds. According to an undisclosed casting industry source familiar with fees, some of the Dominicans now command a day rate in the tens of thousands of dollars.

“Now [Dominican] families dream their lives will change if their girl finds success with a modelling career,” says CNN’s Lamarche, who is producing a documentary on the personal stories of the country’s top models, which is expected to be released later this year.

Next Models' Saint Laurent star Hiandra Martinez is aware of the responsibilities that come with being a role model. She takes pride in the fact that she and others have helped put the Dominican Republic on the map. "It’s a great motivation for young people who want to excel," she says.

The Dominican model moment also represents a wider Latin American movement which, aside from Brazil, includes Argentinians, Puerto-Ricans and Mexican models, according to Ocampo. “I think it's not only Dominicans, it's Latin American women in general," she says. Clearly, with other nationalities showing up in recent seasons like Argentinian Mica Argañaraz or Mexican faces like Issa Lish and Mariana Zaragoza, some believe the Dominican boom could help open the door to more talent from the region.

"Designers [in the region and] in general are more open-minded about beauty and [aware] that women of various backgrounds are buying their products,” Martinez adds, crediting Instagram with some of the progress.

The Vogue Mexico and Latin America editor-in-chief adds that last year her magazine received a great response to Joan Smalls and Mariana Zaragoza's cover and that Ysaunny Brito's April cover was one of the most successful of the year.

Undoubtedly, the rise of Dominican models provides a hopeful outlook for more inclusive show casting, although Hagler argues that there’s still room for improvement. "The presence of Dominican women in fashion indicates the industry is realising the importance of diverse cultural balance in imagery, but we have a lot more work to do in making the playing field fair amongst all races and cultures," he says.

Source: https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/global-currents/dominican-power-on-the-catwalk?utm_source=Subscribers&utm_campaign=19a323320d-&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d2191372b3-19a323320d-417355313
 
^ Dominican girls are so professional & get the job done without much drama ...Manuela Sánchez looks a great prospect really impressed me this season she has a presence about her ...Also Ysaunny is class personified she loves her job ...Lindo is the leader of this pack so consistent on the runway over the last 3yrs ... :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gucci f*cking forgot about non white models now. Someone go ring their bell
 
Considering that the cast was made up entirely of Italian university students, this could either be indicative of a major racial problem in Italian universities, or maybe Barbara's pretty terrible. Probably both.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,712
Messages
15,124,651
Members
84,414
Latest member
NavidNoor
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->