Rodarte S/S 07 NYC | Page 2 | the Fashion Spot

Rodarte S/S 07 NYC

I'm sorry but i really like this!!!!
something that would come from france... sure there's hints of Balenciaga and LaCroix etc.
but this is good!
 
Wow.
Balenciaga on laxatives.

I do however like the magenta dress on Irina in post #16 as she wears it very well. ^_^
 
i don't think it's THAT BAD.

a lot it isn't wearable, but the slim trousers and ruffled jackets are nice. while some of the dresses are a bit out there, i can definitely seem them on zoe deschanel or kate bosworth on the red carpet.

the shoes are amazing.
 
jennifer~ said:
The first several looks weren't bad. I was very excited for Rodarte this season, but my heart sunk when I saw the bulk of this...
Interesting choice of words :p It's bulky all right!! Volume gone wrong :doh:
 
bedtimestorynyc said:
I'm sorry but i really like this!!!!
something that would come from france... sure there's hints of Balenciaga and LaCroix etc.
but this is good!

i dont think there is anything wrong in liking it
i myself like it too... but... from what angle?
the problem with it is that it is not really wearable in todays life.
while Balenciaga did a lot of glamorous eveningwear he did a lot of practical daywear.
also the climate in his time was condusive to making this type of clothing
i think maybe people dont like it because it does not relate to thier lifestyle
or maybe no one's lifestyle for that matter.
lacroix business has never turned a profit. since its existence in 1987
badgley mischka has also been unprofitable, and numerous other examples,
so unless you want a business that is just for the editorial heck of it (which is not really a business anyway , just a money losing venture) by all means go ahead.
but trust me...............for them to last they have got to focus on making clothes that people can wear and not just those that can be photographed for magazine pages
and for people who have money to spend but rather to borrow or get for free
(celebrities)
 
^ :lol: i like the show and the shoes. those clothes aren't suitable for wearing per se but i've always been under the impression that they market wearable clothes with a touch of couture. this was probably over the top for them but i like it as a show and they're entertaining to look at.
 
The dresses remind me of my elementary school project when we pasted tissue paper flowers on paper.

Does anyone else see the tissue-paper resemblance?
 
jeunesse_doree said:
i really like the shoes, but so many of the dresses look like they were designed by glue gun craft addicts. although, I suppose at their price point, a commercial success was out of the cards anyway, but please design something wearable!

LOL :lol:

There are a few good things here, but the rest, OMG :shock: I hope the sisters haven't got their hands in the LSD jar ... what other than hallucinogens could explain this??? :doh: :(
 
Looking at each piece seperately as just an ornament is really what you have to do to appreciate this at all... It is certainly not wearable.

I don't like it a lot, but I think they should be getting a tad more credit..

00200m.jpg
00040m.jpg
00240m.jpg
00310m.jpg

style.com
 
Bonchic said:
it is sad when the shoes are the only good thing right?:p
Not when they're Louboutin! The shoes are spectacular.

Justin, those up close pics really put the clothes in a better perspective, form afar they look all tattered and jostled, but they put alot of effort into it. It almost makes me feel bad that it sucks so supremely.

How pricey is Rodarte?
 
justinleaddict said:
Looking at each piece seperately as just[/]

I don't like it a lot, but I think they should be getting a tad more credit..


sorry but i cant credit them for stitching up naive decorative rosettes all over the place.. i just hate rosettes so much, they are fun for art classes at kidergarten but people should leave them there where they belong

honestly this is far too 'graduate collection' to deserve credit.. or orders
 
well even though only very few of them are wearable ,I like the collection as a whole.but some of the clothes are hideous.
and seems like the designer watched too much balenciaga shows
 
:lol: those shapes are laughable :shock: :blink:

the lace boots are beautiful though. Ai looks like a walking bouquet. reminds me of this V&R launch for Flowerbomb
 

Attachments

  • VR7.jpg
    VR7.jpg
    216.4 KB · Views: 2
Diorling said:
How pricey is Rodarte?

Obviously the priced are from this previous collection, but this may give you an idea...
from Marilyn Kirschner on May 23, 2006 (http://www.lookonline.com/2006_05_01_archive.html) :

Nothing about Rodarte’s designing duo (Kate and Laura Mulleavy) is commonplace, predictable, or ordinary. The talented, hardworking, unassuming California natives (who live with their parents and grandmother in Pasadena) are close enough in age to be mistaken for twins, but are in fact two year apart (Kate is 27, Laura is 25). They are so in sync with one another that, by their own admission - they “are like one”. Their creative collaboration, which has grabbed the attention of the fashion world, perfectly illustrates this harmony.

rodarte-designers.jpg

Left: Laura Mulleavy Right: Kate Mulleavy

The Berkeley grads who studied Art History and English respectively, have only been in business for three seasons, and remain charmingly and refreshingly unspoiled, unaffected, and sweet - even in light of their amazing achievements. In fact, one could easily forgive them if they started acting like demanding, difficult divas, touting their own horns, or putting on artificial ‘airs’, considering that their 21- piece fall collection, which is more like couture than ready to wear and retails from between $1,000 and $16,000, has been nominated by the CFDA, for Swarovski’s Perry Ellis Award for Womenswear (which will be given out at the CFDA Awards on June 5th).

Not to mention that the line will be carried in 20 of the world’s most exclusive and visionary stores including Joyce in Hong Kong, Colette in Paris, and at Bergdorf Goodman in New York (on the 4th floor, just a stone’s throw away from Ralph Rucci - not bad!) This is where I caught up with them yesterday, on the first day of their two-day trunk show. And since I missed their fall/winter 2006 collection, shown during New York Fashion Week in a small intimate venue on the Upper East Side to a crowd that included Anna Wintour and Andre Leon Talley, I was glad to have the opportunity to see the clothes up close and personal.

rodarte-ivorycoat.jpg


For the Mulleavy girls who are inspired by artwork, textures, landscapes, marbleized sculptures, and swirling forms that are “modern and ancient at the same time”, it’s all about “the beauty of construction” and making “unique garments that are timeless”. When I asked which designers from the past, they would have loved to speak with, they immediately named them: Charles James and Coco Chanel. Which living designer? Karl Lagerfeld. But while they absorb EVERYTHING around them and are therefore influenced by it all (they claim to have “photographic memories”), they prefer not to ‘study’ fashion magazines or the work of other designers but rather, rely on their own instincts.

As for which star(s) they would love to dress? Even though this is not high on their priority list right now, and they are not exactly ‘into’ the red carpet scene, they both admitted to having an “obsession with Cate Blanchett” (who, it should be pointed out, would look amazing in their chic, elegant creations with their emphasis on cut, execution, and rendered in an easy on the eye and predominantly neutral color palette - it’s hard not to notice that shades of ivory and black are constant themes).

The designing duo proudly says that everything is lined (if it’s lined) in the HIGHEST grade satin which is “never seen in ready-to-wear” and their philosophy is that “you have to believe in what you’re doing”. This is why they like being far from 7th Avenue (in Pasadena) where they can “live in their own world” and hone their craft.

rodarte-dresstop.jpg

$16,000 highlight of the collection

While everything in this well edited collection stood out from my point of view, the most beautiful piece (and of course, the most expensive at $16,000) was a narrow floor length confection in pale shades of ivory, cream, and pale yellow done in a mind boggling combination of georgette, organza, pleated and crinkled silk chiffon, and satin. It looked gorgeous from every angle (front, back, and side) which is another one of their trademarks.

By the way, speaking about the upcoming CFDA Awards…what are the girls planning to wear for their ‘big night’? In true form (the collection is “not about them” but their being able to realize a dream and fantasize for others), they’re too busy worrying about ‘the others’ and have not figured that part out yet. One thing you can count on: like everything else about them, it will be first class, highly individual, personal, and not cookie cutter predictable.

-Marilyn Kirschner
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top