Shiloh's first picture
- Thread starter Harumi
- Start date
^ I am confused about the baby looking old too. I doubt they pulled a TomKat and bought the baby from some random woman at Disney World a year ago and tucked it under the apparently pregnant moher's shirt just so they could claim that they made it the good old-fashioned way.
I realized that the "Mr and Mrs Smith" DVD was re-released yesterday. What perfect timing with the birth of the baby! Then again, there is no perfect timing in Hollywood. I am sure the producers planned this out.
I realized that the "Mr and Mrs Smith" DVD was re-released yesterday. What perfect timing with the birth of the baby! Then again, there is no perfect timing in Hollywood. I am sure the producers planned this out.
unless he means the baby looks older as in .. angelina must have given birth and consieved earlier then she claimed too... maybe she got pregnant before they were officially going out or something ?? maybe thats what they mean
*AndoraStar*
Day Dreaming
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2002
- Messages
- 10,795
- Reaction score
- 1
Honestly.. I'm really disappointed in what many of you are saying. As a fellow parent, it would freaking break my heart to hear the negativity about a child.. it's truly shameful. IT'S A BABY.. leave it be. Yes babies are born with teeth.. and yes they do have CLOTHES for new borns, you don't have to have them dressed in sleepers. Yes photo's are taken without all the children present.. is it really that much of an issue? Please people show a bit of class.. and let it go.
Last edited by a moderator:
scandinavianchic
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2004
- Messages
- 1,394
- Reaction score
- 1
New pics of the parents from vg.no
masquerade
God Save McQueen
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2005
- Messages
- 8,034
- Reaction score
- 3
i really dont think the kid has teeth. i think its just the gums.
and i dont know much about how babies look at what ages, but the kid looks like a newborn to me.
angelina on the other hand, does not look 30, but thats a whole other issue
and i dont know much about how babies look at what ages, but the kid looks like a newborn to me.
angelina on the other hand, does not look 30, but thats a whole other issue
eternitygoddess
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2004
- Messages
- 7,915
- Reaction score
- 29
^She's always looked much older than 30. I mean look at Reese Witherspoon (who's around 30) and compare the two. Reese looks ages younger.
LoveLetter said:
That makes sense to me. My older sister looks tons like my dad and his side of the family..... I, the second-born, look more like my mom and her side of the family.
My cousin, who is a first born son, looks a lot like his mom as well.
Interesting
evae said:
I wondered about that too....it's on his middle finger but who knows...It could be some secret thing between he and Angelina or he could just be wearing a gold band on his middle finger for the heck of it.
Oh the mysteries
Retro
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
- Messages
- 1,064
- Reaction score
- 3
Hello! sues over Jolie photo leak
Hello! magazine is taking legal action to stop websites publishing a leaked picture of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt with their newborn daughter Shiloh.
The photo "has been obtained totally illegally," said the magazine's features editor, Juliette Herd.
Jolie and Pitt sold the photos through picture agency Getty, with all proceeds going to charity.
Both Hello! and Getty say they will seek damages from any internet sites which reproduce the picture.
'Very concerned'
The leaked photo first surfaced on US gossip blogs Oh No They Didn't and Defamer on Wednesday.
Several sites have already removed the picture, which shows Jolie lying beside her sleeping daughter while Pitt looks on from the side.
At a press conference in Namibia where the couple is currently based, Pitt and Jolie told reporters they had no plans to marry.
"There is nothing in the air. The focus is the kids, and we are obviously extremely committed to the children and as parents together," Jolie told a news conference for local journalists at a hotel in the Namibian coastal town of Swakopmund.
"So that kind of says it for us, and to have a ceremony on top of it is nothing."
The leaked image contains Hello! magazine's logo, suggesting the picture comes from the publication's cover.
The publishers say they have yet to discover the source of the leak.
"It's a complete mystery," said Ms Herd. "And we are very concerned at this breach of copyright".
"Somebody from Hello! must have leaked it," said a spokesperson for People magazine, which owns the rights to the pictures in the US.
"I don't know how it got there."
Baby Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt was born on 27 May in Namibia, Africa, under a veil of secrecy.
Bidding war
Bodyguards and undercover Namibian police officers shielded the celebrity parents from journalists, erecting green cloth screens around the beach resort where they stayed.
A local human rights group accused the security services of using "heavy-handed tactics" to keep the paparazzi at bay.
The first official photos of Jolie and Pitt with their baby daughter are believed to have sparked a bidding war amongst celebrity magazines.
Experts estimate that global rights to the pictures will have raised as much as $7m (£3.75m).
They will be published by Hello! on Thursday, with US magazine People following on Friday. "We are very proud that our daughter was born here, and we leave with fond memories and definitely hungry to return," Pitt said of the family's stay in Namibia.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/entertainment/5055240.stm
Hello! magazine is taking legal action to stop websites publishing a leaked picture of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt with their newborn daughter Shiloh.
The photo "has been obtained totally illegally," said the magazine's features editor, Juliette Herd.
Jolie and Pitt sold the photos through picture agency Getty, with all proceeds going to charity.
Both Hello! and Getty say they will seek damages from any internet sites which reproduce the picture.
'Very concerned'
The leaked photo first surfaced on US gossip blogs Oh No They Didn't and Defamer on Wednesday.
Several sites have already removed the picture, which shows Jolie lying beside her sleeping daughter while Pitt looks on from the side.
At a press conference in Namibia where the couple is currently based, Pitt and Jolie told reporters they had no plans to marry.
"There is nothing in the air. The focus is the kids, and we are obviously extremely committed to the children and as parents together," Jolie told a news conference for local journalists at a hotel in the Namibian coastal town of Swakopmund.
"So that kind of says it for us, and to have a ceremony on top of it is nothing."
The leaked image contains Hello! magazine's logo, suggesting the picture comes from the publication's cover.
The publishers say they have yet to discover the source of the leak.
"It's a complete mystery," said Ms Herd. "And we are very concerned at this breach of copyright".
"Somebody from Hello! must have leaked it," said a spokesperson for People magazine, which owns the rights to the pictures in the US.
"I don't know how it got there."
Baby Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt was born on 27 May in Namibia, Africa, under a veil of secrecy.
Bidding war
Bodyguards and undercover Namibian police officers shielded the celebrity parents from journalists, erecting green cloth screens around the beach resort where they stayed.
A local human rights group accused the security services of using "heavy-handed tactics" to keep the paparazzi at bay.
The first official photos of Jolie and Pitt with their baby daughter are believed to have sparked a bidding war amongst celebrity magazines.
Experts estimate that global rights to the pictures will have raised as much as $7m (£3.75m).
They will be published by Hello! on Thursday, with US magazine People following on Friday. "We are very proud that our daughter was born here, and we leave with fond memories and definitely hungry to return," Pitt said of the family's stay in Namibia.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/entertainment/5055240.stm
They aren't teeth: Epithelial pearls, little cyts on the gums that look like teeth...pretty common, it could even be the impression of her gums and the light just made it look like teeth. I doubt they lied about the birthdate...she looks like a newborn but with big lips.
masquerade
God Save McQueen
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2005
- Messages
- 8,034
- Reaction score
- 3
ugh, these magazines are being so greedy. as much as i loathe brangelina and cant wait til they break up, they sold the pics for charity, and all thise lawsuit stuff just totally goes against that spirit
Last edited by a moderator:
Their baby looks several, several weeks old. She doesn't look like a brand new baby. Wasn't she born like just a few days ago? Plus, in that picture, she does look like she has couple of teeth....Babys get teeth after several months, not just few weeks, so to me thats just weird....
Last edited by a moderator:
masquerade
God Save McQueen
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2005
- Messages
- 8,034
- Reaction score
- 3
well, all the bullsh*t controversy is over, the pic is on people.com
the kid isnt looking as cute from that angle. the nose looks weird. but still, its a little baby. you cant tell what they look like yet. they all look the same
the kid isnt looking as cute from that angle. the nose looks weird. but still, its a little baby. you cant tell what they look like yet. they all look the same
justlooking
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2005
- Messages
- 3,203
- Reaction score
- 1
this is going to sound dumb, but with Angelina and Brad being such an 'international' family, it's kind of weird their baby isn't 'exotic' looking or anything. weird cos i'm so used to seeing their little multi-national family.
I hate the whole Brangelina thing. I like the blood-vile Angelina. oh well.
I hate the whole Brangelina thing. I like the blood-vile Angelina. oh well.
SiennaInLondon
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2004
- Messages
- 3,914
- Reaction score
- 2
I am so glad it is a girl (who is adorable -though I am not sure if that is because Angie makes everything she touches adorable) because it is way more fun to look at female beauty from an objective angle than male beauty.
Similar Threads
Users who are viewing this thread
New Posts
-
-
US Harper's Bazaar Winter 2025 : Meghan, Duchess of Sussex by Malick Bodian (9 Viewers)- Latest: phungnam96
-
-
-