brokenenglish
Deep Red Bells
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2005
- Messages
- 7,784
- Reaction score
- 7
I bet even KFed knows better than this!
Bad move Britney.
Bad move Britney.
Spears defends baby car photos
- Thread starter CelineChic
- Start date
masquerade
God Save McQueen
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2005
- Messages
- 8,034
- Reaction score
- 3
f*cking idiot.
i mean, its one thing to be stupid (which she is) and its another to do stuff like this which is just ugh. that makes me so mad.
i mean, its one thing to be stupid (which she is) and its another to do stuff like this which is just ugh. that makes me so mad.
)
CelineChic
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Messages
- 3,093
- Reaction score
- 1
Wouldn't anyone else doing this in North America be charged with reckless endangerment of an infant?http://img226.imageshack.us/img226/8241/britneydrivingwithsean5thumb1g.jpg
brokenenglish
Deep Red Bells
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2005
- Messages
- 7,784
- Reaction score
- 7
I do believe the event is being "investigated".
I hope she gets a reality check.
I hope she gets a reality check.
CelineChic
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Messages
- 3,093
- Reaction score
- 1
Jennika said:
I would hope that an SUV that expensive has some cup holders!
CelineChic said:I would hope that an SUV that expensive has some cup holders!
it's the only reason I could fathom that she would do something this stupid... maybe the cup holders were filled with other cups and she didn't know how to empty them
I don't understand why this is such a big deal. It's a stupid thing to do, but I don't think it was a law until the 80's or 90's. There's a good chance that your parents did this when you were a child, but I wouldn't call them bad parents.
laurlaur said:
Wow, just b/c it's only been a law for nearly 20-some-odd years means its not that big a deal?
Ya know, the reason it is so dangerous now is b/c of air bags, which all cars (if any) didn't have back then... It could kill the baby instantly... That is why it's so scary... Plus, if she was frigthened and running from the paps (as she states) then I'm even more judgemental of it b/c how many times did Lindsay Lohan get in a car accident for running from the paps in her car.
I'm sorry, Britney is a silly little girl who needs to grow up... for god sake, she's raising a childAnd btw, E! said the Police are not filing paperword b/c they did not see it happen
seasecrets
Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2005
- Messages
- 394
- Reaction score
- 0
[FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=+1] Britney's Baby on Board Troubles [/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Tue Feb 07, 7:48 PM ET[/SIZE][/FONT]
Britney Spears is up to her shoulder restraint in controversy.
A photo of the pop star behind the wheel of a black SUV with infant son Sean Preston in her lap has caught the eye of Los Angeles child welfare officials.
A Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputy was dispatched to Spears' Malibu home Tuesday afternoon at the behest of the L.A. County Department of Children and Family Services.
But sheriff's Deputy Luis Castro said his department is not investigating the singer, who became a first-time mother last September. He said children and family services merely asked the sheriff's department "to obtain her contact information." [SIZE=-1] [/SIZE] Further questions were referred to the child welfare department, which itself couldn't comment on whether an investigation had been opened, Children and Family Services spokesman Stuart Riskin said.
The incident in question occurred Monday in Malibu.
In a statement, Spears, 24, didn't expressly address the matter of the apparently unrestrained baby in her lap. Instead, she lashed out at Hollywood's public enemy number one, the paparazzi.
"Today, I had a horrifying, frightful encounter with the paparazzi while I was with my baby," Spears said. "...I was terrified that this time the physically aggressive paparazzi would put both me and my baby in danger. I instinctively took measures to get my baby and me out of harm's way."
"I love my child and would do anything to protect him."
X17, the photo agency representing the shutterbugs who aimed their lenses at Spears' SUV, had a different take. It said the pictures were taken "in a very peaceful context, in which photographers exhibited no aggressive behavior."
According to an account at People.com, Spears' well-documented day started with a drive to the local Starbucks for her, her bodyguard and her baby. When the bodyguard, who was in the front passenger seat, left the truck to go inside the store, Spears, who was in the driver's seat, removed her son from his child safety seat in the rear.
While Spears was holding her baby, pushy photographers descended, a source told People.com. Spears waited for her bodyguard to return, then drove away, still holding the child.
If that was indeed the getaway method, it's not one recommended by law enforcement.
"In general, putting a baby on the seat, in the lap, is extremely dangerous to the child," California Highway Patrol Office Joe Zizi said. "You need to have that child in a seat, in the back."
Since 2002, California law has required that all children younger than 6 or weighing fewer than 60 pounds be secured in cars by either safety seats or booster seats.
And even if one is trying to dash away from danger and/or a prying photojournalist?
"It's something you have to take the time to do," Zizi said. "Just as putting on the seat belt yourself."
yahoo.com
[FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]Tue Feb 07, 7:48 PM ET[/SIZE][/FONT]
Britney Spears is up to her shoulder restraint in controversy.
A photo of the pop star behind the wheel of a black SUV with infant son Sean Preston in her lap has caught the eye of Los Angeles child welfare officials.
A Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputy was dispatched to Spears' Malibu home Tuesday afternoon at the behest of the L.A. County Department of Children and Family Services.
But sheriff's Deputy Luis Castro said his department is not investigating the singer, who became a first-time mother last September. He said children and family services merely asked the sheriff's department "to obtain her contact information." [SIZE=-1] [/SIZE] Further questions were referred to the child welfare department, which itself couldn't comment on whether an investigation had been opened, Children and Family Services spokesman Stuart Riskin said.
The incident in question occurred Monday in Malibu.
In a statement, Spears, 24, didn't expressly address the matter of the apparently unrestrained baby in her lap. Instead, she lashed out at Hollywood's public enemy number one, the paparazzi.
"Today, I had a horrifying, frightful encounter with the paparazzi while I was with my baby," Spears said. "...I was terrified that this time the physically aggressive paparazzi would put both me and my baby in danger. I instinctively took measures to get my baby and me out of harm's way."
"I love my child and would do anything to protect him."
X17, the photo agency representing the shutterbugs who aimed their lenses at Spears' SUV, had a different take. It said the pictures were taken "in a very peaceful context, in which photographers exhibited no aggressive behavior."
According to an account at People.com, Spears' well-documented day started with a drive to the local Starbucks for her, her bodyguard and her baby. When the bodyguard, who was in the front passenger seat, left the truck to go inside the store, Spears, who was in the driver's seat, removed her son from his child safety seat in the rear.
While Spears was holding her baby, pushy photographers descended, a source told People.com. Spears waited for her bodyguard to return, then drove away, still holding the child.
If that was indeed the getaway method, it's not one recommended by law enforcement.
"In general, putting a baby on the seat, in the lap, is extremely dangerous to the child," California Highway Patrol Office Joe Zizi said. "You need to have that child in a seat, in the back."
Since 2002, California law has required that all children younger than 6 or weighing fewer than 60 pounds be secured in cars by either safety seats or booster seats.
And even if one is trying to dash away from danger and/or a prying photojournalist?
"It's something you have to take the time to do," Zizi said. "Just as putting on the seat belt yourself."
yahoo.com
CelineChic
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Messages
- 3,093
- Reaction score
- 1
Back in the day people used Opium and several narcotics and those have also only recently been outlawed. 
oolie coco
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2005
- Messages
- 6,407
- Reaction score
- 0
It looks so freaking casual, I mean the bodyguard is just chatting away on the phone. This is incredibly stupid and indefensible. No one should ever try and defend putting a baby in danger of DEATH, I'm sorry.
CelineChic
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Messages
- 3,093
- Reaction score
- 1
Why was the title of the topic changed? 
